American Forensic Association National Individual Events Tournament

The American Forensic Association National Individual Events Tournament (AFA-NIET) is an intercollegiate, individual events based forensics tournament held in conjunction with the first Saturday in April, beginning on the prior Friday and continuing through the subsequent Monday.[1] Of the two most prominent college-level IE (individual events) national tournaments (the other being National Forensic Association Nationals), the AFA-NIET has significantly more stringent qualification procedures and a smaller, but more exclusive field of competition.[2][3] The AFA-NIET represents the culmination of the forensics season for many collegiate speech teams.[4]

Arizona State University - Host of the 2014 AFA-NIET

The 2016 AFA-NIET was hosted by the University of Florida over the course of April 1–4. 69 Schools attended the 2016 AFA-NIET, fielding over 1,100 entries in the 11 offered events.[5]

History

Formed in 1949, the American Forensic Association was created with the goal of teaching students to utilize the skills of argumentation and advocacy. In the first decades of its existence, the AFA was primarily focused on promoting debate competitions, with little to no interest in individual events.

As a result in the rapid rise of interest in individual events in the late 1960s, Dr. Seth Hawkins of Southern Connecticut State University, Dr. Raymond Beaty of Ohio University and Dr. Jack Howe of California State University, Long Beach began to propose ideas of an organized national tournament focused on individual events. Dr. Beaty reported that his proposals were entirely disregarded by the debate community.[2] During the 1970-71 forensics season, Dr. Hawkins made the decision that, despite the lack of support from the debate community, the increased interest in IEs justified the establishment of a national championship tournament. This tournament was held on the campus of Ohio Northern University, 23 schools participated, and the annual IE tournament that would eventually become known as NFA Nationals was established.[6]

Realizing that the NFA's new IE national tournament could perpetuate the already existing split within the community regarding the competitive validity of IEs, the AFA began working towards a solution in 1972. Jerry Anderson, the president of the AFA at the time, began calling meetings to address measures that could be taken to incorporate IEs into the AFA's agenda. Anderson proposed a change to the AFA's constitution to allow for the inclusion of IEs, this change was ratified in 1973. Anderson, along with E.R. Tame, the Chair of the Educational Policies Committee, proposed that the AFA enact institutional changes to accommodate IEs. In 1973, the AFA voted to establish the AFA Committee on Individual Events.[7] In the three years following its establishment, the Committee worked towards developing an inceptive procedural standard for the AFA-NIET. This effort was bolstered in 1976, as James Weaver assumed the presidency of the AFA. Weaver proved to be a staunch advocate of the NIET's establishment. Within the first year of taking office, Weaver established the National Individual Events Tournament Committee, and appointed Larry Schnoor of Minnesota State University, Mankato as Chair. Shortly thereafter, Schnoor and the committee began making preparatory arrangements for the inaugural AFA-NIET.[7]

In April 1978 the inaugural AFA-NIET was hosted by Illinois State University. 58 schools attended the 1978 AFA-NIET.[5]

  1. Bethel College (Kansas)
  2. Bradley University
  3. George Mason University
  4. Kansas State University
  5. Minnesota State University, Mankato
  6. University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire[5]

Previous AFA-NIETs

List of Sweepstakes Champions

Both team and individual sweepstakes awards are given to the best overall performing team and individual at each AFA-NIET.

Team sweepstakes awards are given to the teams with the highest total of sweepstakes points earned by the team's individual competitors. At the AFA-NIET, team sweepstakes points are awarded as follows:

When tabulating individual sweepstakes, only the individual competitor's ranks and placings are used, and points awarded for preliminary ballot ranks are doubled. Otherwise individual sweepstakes are tabulated identically to team sweepstakes.[1]

Year Individual Champion Team Champion
1978 Meg Langford, George Mason University Eastern Michigan University
1979 Meg Langford, George Mason University George Mason University
1980 Kim Norris, Iowa State University Bradley University
1981 Sean Patrick O'Rourke, Humboldt State University Bradley University (2)
1982 Laura Gordon, Clarion University of Pennsylvania Bradley University (3)
1983 Pat Page, Whitman College Bradley University (4)
1984 Pat Page, Whitman College Bradley University (5)
1985 Greg Dolph, Bradley University Bradley University (6)
1986 Greg Dolph, Bradley University Bradley University (7)
1987 Tom Doyle, Bradley University Bradley University (8)
1988 Ken Klawitter, Bradley University Bradley University (9)
1989 Cam Jones, Cornell University Bradley University (10)
1990 Peter Tagg, Southern Utah University Bradley University (11)
1991 Karon Bowers, Bradley University Bradley University (12)
1992 Karon Bowers, Bradley University Bradley University (13)
1993 Tim Schultz, Kansas State University Bradley University (14)
1994 Tim Schultz, Kansas State University University of Texas at Austin
1995 August Benassi, Bradley University University of Texas at Austin (2)
1996 August Benassi, Bradley University Bradley University (15)
1997 Matthew Whitley, University of Texas at Austin Bradley University (16)
1998 Nance Riffe, George Mason University Bradley University (17)
1999 Rajni Shankar, George Mason University Bradley University (18)
2000 Chris McLemore, Kansas State University Bradley University (19)
2001 Steve Zammit, Cornell University University of Texas at Austin (3)
2002 Bonny McDonald, University of Texas at Austin University of Texas at Austin (4)
2003 Zenobia Harris, West Texas A&M University Western Kentucky University
2004 Courtney Anderson, George Mason University Western Kentucky University (2)
2005 Ryan Hubbell, Arizona State University Illinois State University
2006 Natalie Sintek, Western Kentucky University Western Kentucky University (3)
2007 Lydia Nelson, Western Kentucky University Western Kentucky University (4)
2008 Jessy Ohl, Kansas State University Western Kentucky University (5)
2009 Merry Regan, University of Texas at Austin Western Kentucky University (6)
2010 Amanda Voirol, Bradley University Bradley University (20)
2011 Quincey Smith, George Mason University Western Kentucky University (7)
2012 Jacoby Cochran, Bradley University Bradley University (21)
2013 Jacoby Cochran, Bradley University Bradley University (22)
2014 Nick Gilyard, Western Kentucky University Western Kentucky University (8)
2015 Farrah Bara, University of Texas at Austin Western Kentucky University (9)
2016 Farrah Bara, University of Texas at Austin University of Texas at Austin (5)

Events

There are 11 events that are sanctioned by the AFA and held at the AFA-NIET. All events fall into one of three categories:

Interpretation Events

There are five AFA sponsored events that fall into the interpretation category. Interpretation events involve the performer selecting and cutting a script, (usually from a play, book, or movie) and acting out the scenes. All AFA interpretation events require the performer to hold a 'black book' that contains their manuscript; this book can be used as the competitor sees fit, meaning it may be used as a prop. All interpretation events have a 10-minute time limit.

Poetry interpretation involves the performance of a selected cutting of poetry with significant literary merit. The performance may be one poem, or a combination of multiple pieces (often referred to as a 'program'). Play cuttings are prohibited from use. The focus of this performance should be on the development of language.[8]

Prose interpretation features the performance of a prose piece of significant literary merit. The performance may feature only one work, or it may be a program. Play cuttings and poetry pieces are prohibited from use. The focus of this performance should be on development of the narrative.[8]

Under the AFA rules of Drama Interpretation, the performer is to create a cutting from either stage, screen, or radio with significant literary merit. The performance may feature only one play, or it may be a program. The performer may portray multiple characters. The focus of this performance should be on the development of characterization.[8]

Program Oral Interpretation, often referred to as POI (pronounced "poy"), is an event that is unique to the AFA-NIET and is not sanctioned by NFA nationals.[9] In POI, the performer is to create a program of selections linked by a common theme, and consisting of at least two, or up to all three of the different genres of forensics interpretation literature (prose, poetry, and drama), with the pieces being of significant literary merit. Each genre must be represented by a unique piece of literature. (one piece may not represent multiple genres) One selection may be original. The focus of this event should be on the development of the theme through the established narrative.[8]

Dramatic Duo is the only AFA sponsored event to feature two competitors in the performance. The performance may feature cuttings from any genre of literature; the cutting may be only one piece, or it may be a program. The selected cutting can be either humorous, serious, or a combination of the two. The performers are not allowed to directly look at each other or touch each other. The performers may each portray multiple characters if they so choose.

Public Address Events

There are four AFA sponsored events that fall into the category of public address. Public address events involve the performance of an originally written speech covering a specific topic or issue. Audio and visual aids are permitted for use in all public address events. Performers are heavily encouraged to integrate multiple sources into their speech. All events in this category have a 10 minute time limit.

Persuasive speaking involves the performer delivering an original speech that is intended to inspire action or change the beliefs of the audience.[8] Minimal notes are permitted, but heavily discouraged. Visual aids are permitted, but not mandatory. Judging should be based on the performer's public speaking skills and the effectiveness of the message.

In informative speaking the performer delivers an original, factual speech that is intended to inform and educate the audience about a unique subject.[8] Minimal notes are permitted, but heavily discouraged.

Also referred to as CA for short, and "rhetorical criticism" at NFA nationals; communication analysis is an original speech centered on the evaluation of a communication event, often referred to as the 'artifact'. (speeches, movements, advertisements, etc.) The evaluation should utilize rhetorical principles and theories.[8] Manuscripts are permitted, but heavily discouraged.

Often referred to as ADS for short, after dinner speaking is an original, humorous speech centered on a single theme or subject. While the speech should be mostly humorous, it should not resemble a stand-up comedy act. Judging should be based on speaking skill, speech coherence, and good taste in humor.[8] Minimal notes are permitted, but heavily discouraged.

Limited Preparation Events

There are two limited preparation events sponsored by the AFA. Limited preparation events are unique from all other forensics events based on the fact that the speech is written 'on the spot' with a limited amount of time allocated to preparation. Both events are performed as speeches. Limited notes (usually a 3"x5" index card) are commonly used in these events. Audio and visual aids may not be used. All limited preparation events have a 7 minute time limit.

In extemporaneous speaking, commonly referred to as extemp, competitors are given three topics covering a range of current events. The competitor will select one of the three topics, and is then given 30 minutes to prepare an original speech, utilizing multiple sources. Extemporaneous speaking is the only AFA sponsored event where competitors speak in a previously assigned order.[8] Limited notes may or may not be used, and are commonplace in this event.

Main article: Impromptu speaking

In impromptu speaking the competitor is given a quotation to use as the topic of their speech. Impromptu speaking is known for its uniquely short preparation time, competitors are given 7 minutes to both prepare and give their speech; speakers are heavily encouraged to keep their preparation time below two minutes. The speech may be humorous, serious, or a combination of both, but should stay relevant to the quotation and the speaker's interpretation of it.[8] Minimal notes are permitted.

Qualification

There are two ways that a competitor can qualify an event for the AFA-NIET:

At-Large Qualification

For an event to be qualified through the at-large process, the competitor must obtain three 'legs' (placings) in the event that total out to 8 or less. (e.g. 3rd, 3rd, 2nd; 5th, 2nd, 1st; 6th, 1st, 1st; 1st, 1st, 1st) In the event that a final round contains more than six competitors (e.g. unbreakable tie), no placing beyond 6th will count as a leg under any circumstances. A leg can be acquired at any tournament in which at least 9 schools are participating.[1]

Placings will only count as a leg if the requirement for number of competitors in the event is met:

District Qualification

Events may also be qualified for the AFA-NIET by placing in the top 10% of the field at their school's respective district qualifying tournament.

All AFA member schools are placed into a district. District placement is largely (but not entirely) based on the state that the school is located in:

Note: Schools may enter a petitioning process if they wish to be placed in a different district.

The respective district committees determine when the district qualifying tournament will be, specifically, but it must take place after January 15 and before the third weekend of March. Events that have already been qualified through the at-large process are ineligible for competition at the district qualifying tournaments. A student qualifies an event for the AFA-NIET when they place in the top 10% of that event, rounding up. (e.g. 20 competitors: top 2; 21 competitors: top 3) If an individual has two legs coming in to the district qualifier and finishes at a placing sufficient for their third leg, then that event is qualified at-large, and everyone who placed below said individual is moved up one spot, allowing them to potentially qualify.[1]

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 "AFA-NIET bylaws" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2014-03-06.
  2. 1 2 Bartanen, Michael (November 7, 2013). Forensics in America: A History. Rowman & Littlefield. p. 107.
  3. ↑ Renz, Mary; Keith Green (1989). "Factors Affecting Choice Among National Tournaments: Reports on a Survey" (PDF). National Forensic Journal. 7 (2): 107. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2014-02-21.
  4. ↑ Burnett, Ann; Jeffrey Brand; Mark Meister (2001). "Forensics Education? How the Structure and Discourse of Forensics Promotes Competition". Argumentation and Advocacy. 38 (2). Retrieved 6 February 2014.
  5. 1 2 3 "AFA-NIET attendance over the years" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2013-05-12.
  6. ↑ Fryar, Linda (1984). "A Brief History of Individual Events Nationals" (PDF). National Forensic Journal. 2 (2): 73–83. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2014-02-21.
  7. 1 2 Yates, Guy; Larry Schnoor (2000). "AFA-NIET History". Argumentation and Advocacy. 37 (1).
  8. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 "AFA-NIET events" (PDF). Retrieved 2013-12-28.
  9. ↑ "NFA Event rules". Retrieved 2013-12-28.
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 10/11/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.