Capron v. Van Noorden
Capron v. Van Noorden | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
Decided March 5, 1804 | |||||||
Full case name | Capron v. Van Noorden | ||||||
Citations |
2 L. Ed. 229; 1804 U.S. LEXIS 253; 2 Cranch 126 | ||||||
Prior history | Error to the Circuit Court of North Carolina | ||||||
Holding | |||||||
A plaintiff is allowed to dismiss a case that he had lost at trial because of a lack of diversity jurisdiction, leaving the plaintiff free to bring the case again. | |||||||
Court membership | |||||||
|
Capron v. Van Noorden, 6 U.S. 126 (1804), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court allowed a plaintiff to dismiss a case that he had lost at trial because of a lack of diversity jurisdiction, leaving the plaintiff free to bring the case again.[1]
References
Further reading
- Friendly, Henry J. (1928), "The Historic Basis of Diversity Jurisdiction", Harvard Law Review, 41 (4): 483–510, doi:10.2307/1330049.
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 6/6/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.