Child soldiers in Sierra Leone

During the decade-long civil conflict which took place in Sierra Leone between 1991 and 2002, the Revolutionary United Front (RUF), state forces and state-supported militias conscripted children for use in combat. Although the use of children in combat is not new to Sierra Leone,[1] the use of child soldiers became widespread during the civil war.[2][3]

The RUF, kidnapped and forced children to fight from when the civil conflict began, and up to eighty per cent of their numbers were aged from seven to fourteen and served in the Small Boys Unit. The state's armed forces, and the militia groups which supported them, also recruited children, which led to an estimated 10,000 children taking part in the conflict.[4][5] According to Myriam Denov up to 30 per cent of the children in the RUF were girls.[6] These girls were subject to rape, gang rape and other forms of sexual violence.[7] The RUF used alcohol and hallucinogenic drugs on children during training, according to a former RUF commander:

We were very much aware of the effects of drugs on children. Drugs and alcohol were prevalent and served as [a] prerequisite for combat activities. Fighting with a gun is not an easy task because it puts so much pressure on the mind. So we needed to free the mind by taking drugs, and it worked.[8]

The RUF were known for being exceptionally brutal; beheadings, maiming and mutilation of victims were commonplace. The group has been heavily criticised by human rights groups for their forced conscription of children to use as combatants, their sexual exploitation of children and using children for forced labour.[9] These children were forced to commit murders, rapes, sexual slavery, mutilations and other forms of human rights abuses.[10]

The Special Court for Sierra Leone affirmed that the recruitment of children under the age of 15 years was a War crime entailing individual criminal responsibility under Customary international law. This principle was codified in Sierra Leone with the adoption of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court in 1998. Further the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child was enforced through agreement on the 21st January 2000. This prohibits the involvement of children under 18 years old in armed conflict. They are not to be deployed by either state or non-state rebel parties; a breach of this will result in it being classified as a criminal act.[11]

Reintegration of Child Soldiers

Article 39 of the Convention on the Rights of the Child states that "parties shall take all appropriate measures to promote physical and psychological recovery and social reintegration of a child of victim of...armed conflicts. Such recovery and reintegration shall take place in an environment which fosters the health, self-respect and dignity of the child".[12] Reintegration programs are facilitated within a human rights framework by non-governmental and governmental organisations. They primarily focus on the needs of the child and often fail to adequately prepare families for receiving and facilitating reintegration of the victim.[13]

Primary Organisations Facilitating Reintegration Programs

The United Nations

The United Nations (UN) was influential in ending the hostilities in Sierra Leone. They established the peace-keeping mission, the United Nations Mission in Sierra Leone (UNAMSIL), who assisted the Government of Sierra Leone in implementing the Disarmament, demobilization and reintegration (DDR) method. The objective of the DDR is to "contribute security and stability in post-conflict environments so that recovery and development can begin".[14] This system is used in coordination with other political and reconstruction mechanisms to ensure that long-term sustainable reintegration support is provided and to prevent Sierra Leone returning to violent conflict. In March 2004 the Secretary-General of the United Nations proposed that UNAMSIL's mandate be extended to December 2005 due to the fragile nature of the state's Government and concern that they were not ready to assume responsibility for the country's security.[15]

United Nations Children's Fund

UNICEF (United Nations Children's Fund) was a principle agency assisting the Government and other third party organisations in employing the DDR program throughout Sierra Leone between 1998 and 2002.[16] UNICEF provided protection for demobilised children within their interim care centres (ICC) whilst they conducted family tracing exercises to achieve reunification. 5038 demobilised child soldiers passed through these centres before their closure. They also assisted in tracing the families of 2166 children who had not been associated with armed conflict.[17] These interim care centres offered children access to medical care and educational activities. ICC's policies intended to limit victims stay to a maximum of 6 weeks.[18] Where ex-soldiers were not able to be reunited with their families or communities, UNICEF was able to provide them with foster homes.[19]

GOAL

Goal is a non-governmental organisation based in Ireland which is funded by UNICEF.[20] It operates specifically in Freetown and its reintegration approach is focused on providing informal education, social work, advocacy and health care initiatives to male ex-combatants who are under 18 years old and female victims of sexual abuse.[21] In some cases they have been confronted with difficulty in attracting female victims to attend informal educational classes. To address this issue, GOAL started distributing food packages to those who attended these programs.

Forum for African Women's Educationalists

Forum for African Women Educationalists (FAWE) provides education for females across Africa, including in Freetown Sierra Leone. Their first project was established in 1999 and offered victims of sexual exploitation access to medical and psychological clinics. They further expanded this program through establishing community sensitisation services focused on enabling the reintegration of females with babies who were the product of sexual violation during conflict. These services were implemented through ensuring the accessibility of health care, education and skills training.[22]

National Commission for Social Action

The National Commission for Social Action (NaCSA) is a mandate of the Government Sierra Leone. It provides for reconstruction and relief and focuses on providing development which enables sustainable reintegration. It has established three specific programs: a community based program, public works program and micro finance program. It has played a pivotal role in re-establishing local governments.[23]

The Focus Of These Facilitators

These organisations primarily include access to:[24]

These programs focus on establishing long-term support networks and reintegration schemes which can continue to sustainably function without the long-term assistance from the third party organisations previously discussed. This long-term vision requires political, economic and social support.[25]

The "DDR" Method

The process of DDR is broken down into four stages:

The Disarmament, demobilization and reintegration method has been facilitated by 17,500 peace-keepers.[29] The initial program was concluded on the 31st of December 2003 and it was estimated that 6,845 ex-soldiers had been demobilised by 2002 and reunified with their families. Female victims equated to an estimated 529 of these children.[30] In February 2004, the Sierra Leone Government stated that the United Nations Mission in Sierra Leone program was complete. It had processed over 75,000 combatants, which included 4,651 women.[31] It was estimated that nearly 55,000 ex-fighters were given access to the integration benefits previously discussed.[32] Another 3000 children were involved in community programs organised by UNICEF [33] and 12,000 ex-fighters were processed through formal education schemes.[34]

The 'DDR' program was adapted in 2006 to formally become the Integrated DDR Standards (IDDRS).

Issues Arising During Reintegration

Psychological Issues

Militant groups including the Revolutionary United Front (RUF) subjected these child soldiers to training methods which hardened them through making them immune to violence. They were taught that this type of heinous behaviour and ideological thinking was a normalised process and they were not allowed to demonstrate remorse for their actions. The RUF instilled the notion that the soldiers should never return home because of the violent atrocities they had carried out against their families and communities.[35] This invoked severe psychological effects including: anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder, hostility and aggression on many of the victims.[36] However, not all ex-combatants have suffered from these medical issues; some have demonstrated resilient social and mental health functions.[37]

Communication Issues Concerning The Victim's Family

Issues relating to the communication between victims and their families concerning the severity of the soldiers adolescent experiences were evident during the reintegration process. This issue stemmed from the failure of reintegration programs to successfully prepare and provide caregivers with direction in preparation for the victims return. These programs tended to focus primarily on the child. It was evident that where caregivers were unable to monitor and understand the severity of the victims exposure to violence, it heavily affected the child's ability to reintegrate into the community.[38] Alternatively in some cases victims struggled to communicate their feelings due to the guilt, shame and stigma attached to their experiences. In these situations the severity of their communicative problems were dependent on the victims age, gender and role in the conflict. Issues relating to the communication between victims and their families concerning the severity of the soldiers adolescent experiences were evident during the reintegration process. This issue stemmed from the failure of reintegration programs to successfully prepare and provide caregivers with sufficient preparation for the victims return. These programs tended to focus primarily on the child. It was evident that where caregivers were unable to monitor and understand the severity of the victims exposure to violence, it heavily affected the child's ability to reintegrate into the community.[39]

"Re-Victimization"

Re-victimization was prevalent within communities in post-conflict Sierra Leone, particularly during support processes and within community reintegration. It is widely recognised that it was more prevalent for females to be subjected to community rejection. Social and economic marginalisation between former female and male combatants was rife. An estimated 1000 women and girls were excluded from DDR programs and are believed to have been living with former rebel combatants.[40] Females were commonly denied access to DDR programs because of the requirement to hand in a weapon to qualify for assistance. In a UNICEF survey, 46% of those surveyed referenced this as their reason for being excluded from assistance.[41] Females often did not have access to weapons when they were recruited for roles involving: sexual labour, cooking and porter assistance.[42] Negative stigma and alienation within communities was frequently experienced by girls who were victims of brutal sexual encounters including Gang rape, violence and "AK-47 Marriages" or "Bush Marriages". These females were labelled as "unmarriageable" because of their exposure to sexual exploitation which often resulted in them losing their virginity before marriage. These girls were also associated with being carriers of HIV and STI's. This label forced females to be excluded socially and economically.[43] As a result of this "re-victimization" it was common for these females to have no choice but to stay with their rebel "husbands" in order to survive or choose prostitution to generate disposable income to support themselves.[44] In response to this exclusion, UNICEF established the 'Girls Left Behind Project' which focused on: appropriating services to 1000 females, tracing 65% of their families, educating communities to ensure they did not suffer from further exploitations.

Avoidance of DDR Programs

Some ex-RUF children have evaded the DDR process because they fear that they will be criminally prosecuted for their involvements with the atrocities committed by the RUF and be victims to the negative stigmatisation attached to their actions.[45] Where children avoid assistance they are often left with no newly acquired skills or financial benefits and are forced to support themselves. Often these individuals become involved with commercial sex labour, crime and drug exploitation to ensure survival.[46]

Legal proceedings

According to legal scholar Sandesh Sivakumaran, the special court has provided needed clarification over the use of children in combat, and had identified certain actions which could be deemed as illegal with regards to the use of children in combat.[47]

In 2007 the special court passed the first convictions for war crimes during the conflict. Three members of the Armed Forces Revolutionary Council (AFRC) were found guilty of various human rights abuses, which included the recruitment of children for use in combat.[48]

References

  1. ↑ Drumbl 2012, p. 70.
  2. ↑ Pham 2005, p. 108.
  3. ↑ Rosen 2012, p. 26.
  4. ↑ Singer 2006, pp. 15–16.
  5. ↑ Rosen 2005, p. 62.
  6. ↑ MacKenzie 2012, p. 41.
  7. ↑ Denov 2010, p. 123.
  8. ↑ Denov 2010, p. 100.
  9. ↑ Rosen 2005, p. 60.
  10. ↑ Rosen 2005, p. 58.
  11. ↑ Archived August 19, 2013, at the Wayback Machine., Reintegration of Child Ex-combatants in Sierra Leone with particular focus on the needs of females.
  12. ↑ , UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, Article 39.
  13. ↑ , Reintegration of Former Child Soldiers in Sierra Leone: The role of caregivers and their awareness of the violence adolescents experienced during the war.
  14. ↑ , Integrated Disarmament, Demobolization and Reintegration Standards.
  15. ↑ , The Child Soldiers Global Report 2004.
  16. ↑ Archived August 19, 2013, at the Wayback Machine., Reintegration of Child Ex-combatants in Sierra Leone with particular focus on the needs of females.
  17. ↑ Archived November 26, 2013, at the Wayback Machine., The Disarmament, Demobilisation and Reintegration of Child Soldiers: Social and Psychological Transformation in Sierra Leone.
  18. ↑ Archived November 26, 2013, at the Wayback Machine., The Disarmament, Demobilisation and Reintegration of Child Soldiers: Social and Psychological Transformation in Sierra Leone.
  19. ↑ , UNICEF Fact Sheet on Child Soldiers.
  20. ↑ GOAL.
  21. ↑ Archived August 19, 2013, at the Wayback Machine., Reintegration of Child Ex-combatants in Sierra Leone with particular focus on the needs of females.
  22. ↑ Archived August 19, 2013, at the Wayback Machine., Reintegration of Child Ex-combatants in Sierra Leone with particular focus on the needs of females.
  23. ↑ Archived August 19, 2013, at the Wayback Machine., Reintegration of Child Ex-combatants in Sierra Leone with particular focus on the needs of females.
  24. ↑ , Community Based Psychosocial and Economic Reintegration in Sierra Leone.
  25. ↑ , Integrated Disarmament, Demobolization and Reintegration Standards.
  26. ↑ , Integrated Disarmament, Demobolization and Reintegration Standards.
  27. ↑ , Integrated Disarmament, Demobolization and Reintegration Standards.
  28. ↑ , Integrated Disarmament, Demobolization and Reintegration Standards.
  29. ↑ , United Nations Mission in Sierra Leone Factsheet.
  30. ↑ , Integrated Disarmament, Demobolization and Reintegration Standards.
  31. ↑ , United Nations Mission in Sierra Leone Fact Sheet.
  32. ↑ , United Nations Mission in Sierra Leone Fact Sheet.
  33. ↑ , The Child Soldiers Global Report 2004.
  34. ↑ , United Nations Mission in Sierra Leone Fact Sheet.
  35. ↑ Archived November 26, 2013, at the Wayback Machine., The Disarmament, Demobilisation and Reintegration of Child Soldiers: Social and Psychological Transformation in Sierra Leone.
  36. ↑ , Child Soldiers in Sierra Leone: Experiences, Implications and Strategies for Rehabilitation and Community Reintegration.
  37. ↑ , Reintegration of Former Child Soldiers in Sierra Leone: The Role of Caregivers and their Awareness of the Violence Adolescents experienced during the War.
  38. ↑ , Reintegration of Former Child Soldiers in Sierra Leone: The Role of Caregivers and their Awareness of the Violence Adolescents experienced during the War.
  39. ↑ , Reintegration of Former Child Soldiers in Sierra Leone: The Role of Caregivers and their Awareness of the Violence Adolescents experienced during the War.
  40. ↑ , The Twenty-First Report of the UN Secretary-General on the UN Mission in Sierra Leone.
  41. ↑ Archived October 20, 2011, at the Wayback Machine., US AID Reintegration of Child Soldiers in Sierra Leone.
  42. ↑ Archived August 19, 2013, at the Wayback Machine., Reintegration of Child Ex-combatants in Sierra Leone with particular focus on the needs of females.
  43. ↑ , Reintegration of Former Child Soldiers in Sierra Leone: The Role of Caregivers and their Awareness of the Violence Adolescents experienced during the War.
  44. ↑ Archived August 19, 2013, at the Wayback Machine., Reintegration of Child Ex-combatants in Sierra Leone with particular focus on the needs of females.
  45. ↑ , Child Soldiers in Sierra Leone: Experiences, Implications and Strategies for Rehabilitation and Community Reintegration.
  46. ↑ , Child Soldiers in Sierra Leone: Experiences, Implications and Strategies for Rehabilitation and Community Reintegration.
  47. ↑ Sivakumaran 2010, pp. 1033–1034.
  48. ↑ Human Rights Watch 2007.

Bibliography

  • Denov, Myriam S. (2010). Child Soldiers: Sierra Leone's Revolutionary United Front (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0521872249. 
  • Drumbl, Mark A. (2012). Reimagining Child Soldiers in International Law and Policy. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0199592654. 
  • MacKenzie, Megan H. (2012). Female Soldiers in Sierra Leone: Sex, Security, and Post-Conflict Development. New York University Press. ISBN 978-0814761373. 
  • "Sierra Leone: Landmark Convictions for Use of Child Soldiers". Human Rights Watch. 21 June 2007. Retrieved 17 April 2014. 
  • Pham, John-Peter (2005). Child Soldiers, Adult Interests: The Global Dimensions of the Sierra Leonean Tragedy. Nova Science Publishers. ISBN 978-1594546716. 
  • Rosen, David M. (2012). Child Soldiers: A Reference Handbook. ABC-CLIO. ISBN 978-1598845266. 
  • Rosen, David M. (2005). Armies of the Young: Child Soldiers in War and Terrorism. Rutgers University Press. ISBN 978-0813535685. 
  • Singer, Peter W. (2006). Children at War. University of California Press. ISBN 978-0520248762. 
  • Sivakumaran, Sandesh (2010). "War Crimes before the Special Court for Sierra Leone". Journal of International Criminal Justice. 8 (4): 1009–1034. doi:10.1093/jicj/mqq056. 
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 12/4/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.