Death of Yoshihiro Hattori

Death of Yoshihiro Hattori
Date October 17, 1992
Location Baton Rouge, Louisiana, U.S.
Accused Rodney Peairs
Charges Manslaughter
Verdict Not guilty

Yoshihiro Hattori (服部 剛丈 Hattori Yoshihiro, November 22, 1975 – October 17, 1992) was a Japanese exchange student residing in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States, at the time of his death. Hattori was on his way to a Halloween party and went to the wrong house by accident. The property owner, Rodney Peairs, shot and killed Hattori, thinking he was trespassing with criminal intent. The homicide and Peairs' acquittal in the state court of Louisiana received worldwide attention.

Hattori's early life

Born in Nagoya, Japan, to Masaichi and Mieko Hattori, Yoshihiro was 16 years old when he went to Baton Rouge as part of the American Field Service (AFS) student exchange program; he had also received a scholarship from the Morita Foundation for his trip. He was the middle child between a brother and a sister, and was described as a gregarious teen who played on his high school rugby team and loved fishing.

Fatal incident

Two months into his stay in the United States, Hattori and his homestay brother Webb Haymaker received an invitation to a Halloween party on October 17, 1992, organized for Japanese exchange students. Hattori went dressed in a tuxedo in imitation of John Travolta from the film Saturday Night Fever. Upon their arrival in the quiet working-class neighborhood where the party was held, the boys mistook the Peairs' residence for their intended destination due to the similarity of the address and the Halloween decorations on the outside of the house. They stepped out of their car and walked to the front door.[1]

Hattori and Haymaker rang the front doorbell but received no response. Bonnie Peairs had peered out the side door and seen them; she retreated inside, locked the door, and told her husband Rodney to get his gun. Hattori and Haymaker were returning to their car when Rodney Peairs opened the carport door, armed with a loaded and cocked .44 Magnum revolver. He pointed the gun at Hattori and yelled, "Freeze!" Hattori stepped back toward the house, saying. "We're here for the party." Haymaker spotted the weapon and shouted a warning after Hattori; Peairs fired his weapon at point blank range at Hattori, hitting him in the chest, and then ran inside.[2] Haymaker rushed to Hattori, who was badly wounded and lying on his back. Haymaker ran to the home next door for help. Neither Peairs came out of their house until the police arrived about 40 minutes after the shooting. Bonnie Peairs shouted to a neighbor to "go away" when the neighbor called for help.

The shot pierced the upper and lower lobes of Hattori's left lung and exited through the area of the seventh rib; he died in the ambulance minutes later from loss of blood.[3]

Criminal trial of Rodney Peairs

Initially, the local police quickly questioned and released Rodney Peairs, and declined to charge him with any crime. They stated, "Peairs had been within his rights in shooting the trespasser."[4] Only after Louisiana governor Edwin Edwards and the New Orleans Japanese consul general protested was Peairs charged with manslaughter. His defense was his claim that Hattori had an "extremely unusual manner of moving" that any reasonable person would find "scary", and emphasis on Peairs as an "average Joe", a man just like the jury members' neighbors, a man who "liked sugar in his grits".[5]

At the trial, Peairs testified about the moment just prior to the shooting: "It was a person, coming from behind the car, moving real fast. At that point, I pointed the gun and hollered, 'Freeze!' The person kept coming toward me, moving very erratically. At that time, I hollered for him to stop. He didn't; he kept moving forward. I remember him laughing. I was scared to death. This person was not gonna stop, he was gonna do harm to me." Peairs testified that he shot Hattori once in the chest when the youth was about five feet away. "I had no choice", he said. "I want Yoshi's parents to understand that I'm sorry for everything."

District Attorney Doug Moreau concentrated on establishing that it had not been reasonable for Peairs, a 6-foot-2-inch tall, well-armed man, to be so fearful of a polite, friendly, unarmed, 130-pound boy who rang the doorbell, even if he walked toward him unexpectedly in the driveway, and that Peairs was not justified in using deadly force. Moreau stated, "It started with the ringing of the doorbell. No masks, no disguises. People ringing doorbells are not attempting to make unlawful entry. They didn't walk to the back yard, they didn't start peeking in the windows."

"You were safe and secure, weren't you?" Moreau asked Mr. Peairs during his appearance before the grand jury. "But you didn't call the police, did you?"
"No sir." Peairs said.
"Did you hear anyone trying to break in the front door?"
"No sir."
"Did you hear anyone trying to break in the carport door?"
"No sir."
"And you were standing right there at the door, weren't you - with a big gun?"
Peairs nodded.
"I know you're sorry you killed him. You are sorry, aren't you?"
"Yes sir."
"But you did kill him, didn't you?"
"Yes sir."[6]

Mr. Peairs testified in a flat, toneless drawl, breaking into tears several times. A police detective testified that Peairs had said to him, "Boy, I messed up; I made a mistake."[7]

The defense argued that Mr. Peairs was in large part reacting reasonably to his wife's panic. Mrs. Peairs testified for an hour describing the incident, during which she also broke into tears several times. "He was coming real fast, and it just clicked in my mind that he was going to hurt us. I slammed the door and locked it. I took two steps into the living room, where Rod could see me and I could see him. I told him to get the gun." Mr. Peairs did not hesitate or question her, but instead went to retrieve a handgun with a laser sight that was stored in a suitcase in the bedroom, which he said "was the easiest, most accessible gun to me."

"There was no thinking involved. I wish I could have thought. If I could have just thought", Bonnie Peairs said.[8]

The trial lasted seven days. After the jurors deliberated for three and a quarter hours, Peairs was acquitted.

Civil trial

In a later civil action, however, the court found Mr. Peairs liable to Hattori's parents for $650,000 in damages,[9] which they used to establish two charitable funds in their son's name; one to fund U.S. high school students wishing to visit Japan, and one to fund organizations that lobby for gun control.[10] The lawyers for Hattori's parents argued that the Peairs' had behaved unreasonably: Bonnie Peairs overreacted to the presence of two teens outside her house; the Peairs' behaved unreasonably by not communicating with each other to convey what exactly the threat was; they had not taken the best path to safety—remaining inside the house and calling police; they had erred in taking offensive action rather than defensive action; and Rodney Peairs had used his firearm too quickly, without assessing the situation, using a warning shot, or shooting to wound. Furthermore, the much larger Peairs could likely very easily have subdued the short, slightly built teen. Contrary to Mr. Peairs' claim that Hattori was moving strangely and quickly towards him, forensic evidence demonstrates that Hattori was moving slowly, or not at all, and his arms were away from his body, indicating he was no threat. Overall, a far greater show of force was used than was appropriate.[11] The Peairs appealed the decision, but the Louisiana Court of Appeals upheld the decision in October 1995,[12] and a second appeal to the Supreme Court of Louisiana was rejected in January 1996.[13] Out of the total compensation, only $100,000 has been paid by an insurance company.[14]

Afterwards

After the trial, Peairs told the press that he would never again own a gun.[15]

The Japanese public were shocked not only by the killing, but by Peairs' acquittal. Shortly after the Hattori case, a Japanese exchange student, Takuma Ito, and a Japanese-American student, Go Matsura, were killed in a carjacking in San Pedro, California, and another Japanese exchange student, Masakazu Kuriyama, was shot in Concord, California. Many Japanese reacted to these deaths as being similar symptoms of a sick society; TV Asahi commentator Takashi Wada put the feelings into words by asking, "But now, which society is more mature? The idea that you protect people by shooting guns is barbaric."

One million Americans and 1.65 million Japanese signed a petition urging stronger gun controls in the US; the petition was presented to Ambassador Walter Mondale on November 22, 1993, who delivered it to President Bill Clinton. Shortly thereafter, the Brady Bill was passed, and on December 3, 1993, Mondale presented Hattori's parents with a copy.[16][17]

Suspicions of implicit racism in the acquittal of Rodney Peairs further gained traction when, shortly afterwards, a homeowner named Todd Vriesenga, inside his house in Grand Haven, Michigan, similarly shot and killed 17-year-old named Adam Provencal through the front door. Vriesenga received a 16- to 24-month term for "reckless use of a firearm resulting in death", causing both Japanese and Asian-American advocacy groups to speculate on whether the difference between Vriesenga's conviction and Peairs' acquittal was related to the race of the victims. Other groups publicly stated that Vriesenga should have been convicted of the more severe charge of felony manslaughter.[3]

Shortly afterwards was the similar case of Andrew de Vries, from Aberdeen, Scotland, who got lost on January 7, 1994, after drinking with American friends in Houston, Texas. He knocked on a back door of a house asking for directions, and was shot by the householder through the closed door. The householder, Jeffrey Agee, was not indicted, and later settled for an undisclosed sum a substantial claim by de Vries's widow Alison. De Vries's mother complained to the press of a lack of support from the UK Government, saying "[Prime Minister Major] doesn't want to rock the boat when it comes to the United States. People should be aware that if they become innocent victims of crime in Texas they cannot expect help from the Government, the Foreign Office or the British Consulate." The de Vries family's Member of Parliament, John McAllion, criticized the investigation by the authorities in Houston, saying that there were "many inconsistencies, indeed blatant lies" in the official version of the events.[18]

See also

References

  1. ↑ Fujio 2004; Harper n.d.
  2. ↑ Kernodle 2002; Fujio 2004; Harper n.d.
  3. 1 2 Liu, J. Harper. "Two deaths, no justice". Goldsea. Retrieved December 29, 2005.
  4. ↑ Ressler, Robert. I Have Lived in the Monster. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1997. p. 32
  5. ↑ "Defense Depicts Japanese Boy as 'Scary'". The New York Times. May 21, 1993.
  6. ↑ Associated Press report of the trial
  7. ↑ "Feared Japanese Teen-Ager, Slaying Suspect Says". L.A. Times. May 23, 1993. Retrieved 24 September 2014.
  8. ↑ Tucker, Cynthia (May 29, 1993). "A tragic shooting no slogan explains". Sarasota Herald-Tribune. p. 12A. Retrieved 24 September 2014.
  9. ↑ Lee, Elisa (1994). "Yoshihiro Hattori's Parents Awarded $650,000 In Suit". AsianWeek. Retrieved December 29, 2005.
  10. ↑ Blakeman, Karen (2000). "Japanese couple joins anti-gun fight in U.S.". Honolulu Advertiser. Archived from the original on December 2, 2005. Retrieved December 29, 2005.
  11. ↑ Ressler, Robert. I Have Lived in the Monster. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1997, pp. 38–43
  12. ↑ Hattori v. Peairs, 662 So. 2d 509 (Louisiana Court of Appeal 6 October 1995) (“The shooting attracted national, as well as international attention. Following a four-day trial on September 12-15, 1994, the trial judge rendered judgment in favor of Yoshi's parents, Masaichi and Mieko Hattori (the Hattoris) finding Rodney Peairs to be solidarily liable with his homeowner's insurer, Louisiana Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company (Farm Bureau), in the amount of $653,077.85 together with legal interest and costs. Farm Bureau's liability was subject to the $100,000.00 coverage limitations of its policy.
    [...]
    While we do not doubt that Rodney Peairs' fear of impending bodily harm was genuine, we nevertheless find nothing within the record to support his assertion that such fear was reasonable. Prior to the shooting, Yoshi and Webb had announced their presence by ringing the doorbell of the Peairs' home. Testifying that he believed Yoshi to be armed, Rodney Peairs conceded that he did not see a gun, a knife, a stick, or a club— only an object which he later ascertained to be a camera. In the well-lit carport, Rodney Peairs stated that he observed an oriental person proceeding towards him and that he appeared to be laughing. We have no idea why Yoshi failed to heed Rodney Peairs' order to "Freeze," or grasp the danger posed by the gun, but can only speculate that the answer stems from cultural differences and an unfamiliarity with American slang. Under the circumstances of this case, we cannot say that it was either reasonable or necessary for Rodney Peairs to resort to the use of deadly force in order to protect himself and his family.”).
  13. ↑ Hattori v. Peairs, 666 So. 2d 322 (Supreme Court of Louisiana 12 January 1996) (“Denied.”).
  14. ↑ Yoshi Coalition (2007). "Yoshi Coalition". Retrieved November 20, 2008.
  15. ↑ "Acquittal in Doorstep Killing of Japanese Student". The New York Times. p. 1. Retrieved 4 December 2013.
  16. ↑ Reischauer, Edwin O. (1994). "The United States and Japan in 1994: Uncertain Prospects". Edwin O. Reischauer Center for East Asian Studies. Retrieved December 29, 2005. (NOTE: as the original link directing to Gateway Japan is dead, excerpts collected at Japan, Incorporated by Tarrant, William are being used)
  17. ↑ Kernodle, Katrina (2002). "Gun Stance Highlights Cultural Gap between U.S. and Japan". Frances Kernodle Associates. Retrieved December 30, 2005.
  18. ↑ Glasgow Herald, 15 June 1994

Further reading

External links

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 11/29/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.