Flock of Dodos

Flock of Dodos: The Evolution-Intelligent Design Circus
Directed by Randy Olson
Produced by Ty Carlisle
Written by Randy Olson
Distributed by New Video (US Home Video), Documentary Educational Resources (International)
Release dates
  • 2006 (2006)
Running time
 84 minutes
Country United States
Language English

Flock of Dodos: The Evolution-Intelligent Design Circus is a documentary film by American marine biologist and filmmaker Randy Olson. It highlights the debate between proponents of the concept of intelligent design and the scientific consensus that supports evolution.

The documentary was first screened publicly on February 2, 2006 in Kansas, where much of the public controversy on intelligent design began, as well as the starting point of discussion in the documentary. Other public screenings followed in universities, including Harvard and the SUNY Stony Brook, marking the celebration of Charles Darwin's birthday.

Synopsis

Flock of Dodos examines the disagreements that proponents of intelligent design have with the scientific consensus position of evolution.[1]

The evolutionarily famous dodo (Raphus cucullatus) is a now-extinct bird that lived on the island of Mauritius. Due to its lack of fear of humans and inability to fly, the dodo was easy prey, and thus became known for its apparent stupidity.

The film attempts to determine who the real "dodos" are in a constantly evolving world: the scientists who are failing to effectively promote evolution as a scientifically accepted fact, the intelligent design advocates, or the American public who get fooled by the "salesmanship" of evolution critics. The film gives equal air time to both sides of the argument, including intelligent design proponent Michael Behe and several of his colleagues.

While Randy Olson ultimately sides with the scientists who accept evolution, the scientists are criticized for their elitism and inability to efficiently present science to the general public, which ultimately contributes to the spread of misconceptions.[2]

The film begins by going over the history of intelligent design thought from Plato and Paley to the present-day incarnation promoted by the Discovery Institute. Olson mixes in humorous cartoons of squawking dodos with commentary from his mother and interviews with proponents on both sides of the intelligent design/evolution debate.

On the intelligent design side, Olson interviews Behe, John Calvart (founder of the Access Research Network) and a member of the Kansas school board.[3] Olson also unsuccessfully tries to interview Kansas Board of Education member Connie Morris (associated with Kansas evolution hearings) and members of the Discovery Institute.

Release

The documentary premiered at the Tribeca Film Festival in New York, in April 2006,[4] and since then has played at film festivals all over the U.S. and abroad. The documentary was shown in museums and universities as part of a "Dodos Darwin Day" event (celebrating Charles Darwin's birthday) on or around February 12, 2007. Flock of Dodos: the Evolution-Intelligent Design Circus is currently (as of January 2008) in rotation on Showtime in the US and available on DVD.[5]

The documentary was praised by the journal Nature[6] and a variety of other publications.[7][8]

In 2007, Olson released a collection of "pulled punches," of unreleased material that he chose to leave out that reflected poorly on intelligent design supporters.[9]

Discovery Institute response

Olson invited the Discovery Institute, a hub of the intelligent design movement, to appear in the movie, but rather the institute responded by creating a website, Hoax of Dodos, characterizing the documentary as "revisionist history," and a "hoax" filled with inaccuracies and misrepresentations.[10]

Biologist PZ Myers responded to the institute's "bogus complaint that Olson was lying in the movie" about Ernst Haeckel's drawings of embryos is false.[11] Myers explained the drawings have not been used in recent biology textbooks "other than a mention that once upon a time Haeckel came up with this idea of ontogeny recapitulating phylogeny." Myers and other critics of intelligent design have shown that each of these texts treats Haeckel's theory of ontogeny recapitulating phylogeny as an example of an outdated exaggeration.[11] Myers notes in his rebuttal of the criticism from design proponents that, "I would add that progress in evolutionary biology has led to better explanations of the phenomenon that vertebrate embryos go through a period of similarity: it lies in conserved genetic circuitry that lays down the body plan."[11]

In early 2007, in response to Olson's claim, "the Discovery Institute is truly the big fish in this picture, with an annual budget of around $5 million," the Institute responded that their budget is only $4.2 million, and that they spend close to $1 million per year funding intelligent design.[10][12]

References

  1. ↑ "Filmmaker Portrays Evolutionists as a 'Flock of Dodos'". Live Science. 3 March 2006. Retrieved 2008-08-17.
  2. ↑ "Filmmaker Portrays Evolutionists as a 'Flock of Dodos', Ker Than, March 03, 2006 (retrieved July 24, 2013)
  3. ↑ "A Flock of Dodos: The Evolution-Intelligent Design Circus". New York Times. 2008. Retrieved 2008-08-17.
  4. ↑ "Interview: 'Flock of Dodos' and the Debate over Intelligent Design". NPR. April 26, 2006. Retrieved 2008-08-17.
  5. ↑ "Flock of Dodos: The Evolution-Intelligent Design Circus". Showtime. 2008. Retrieved 2008-08-17.
  6. ↑ "Flock of Dodos". Nature. 3 February 2006. Retrieved 2008-08-17.
  7. ↑ "Nationwide Screenings of FLOCK OF DODOS to Celebrate Darwin Day 2007". National Center for Science Education. December 6, 2006. Retrieved 2009-11-06.
  8. ↑ "Randy "Flock of Dodos" Olson Speaks". Discover Magazine. February 17, 2006. Retrieved 2008-08-17.
  9. ↑ "Flock of Dodos DVD Extras, "Pulled Punches"". YouTube. May 10, 2007. Retrieved 2008-08-17.
  10. 1 2 Hoax of Dodos Discovery Institute, February 7, 2007.
  11. 1 2 3 PZ Myers, Wells' false accusation against Randy Olson, Pharyngula (blog), 2007
  12. ↑ ,

External links

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 7/5/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.