Georg Friedrich Creuzer
| Friedrich Creuzer | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Born |
10 March 1771 Marburg |
| Died |
6 February 1858 (aged 86) Heidelberg |
| Nationality | German |
| Alma mater | University of Jena |
| Occupation | Archaeologist and philologist |
Georg Friedrich Creuzer (German: [ˈkʀɔɪtsɐ]; 10 March 1771 – 6 February 1858) was a German philologist and archaeologist.
He was born at Marburg, the son of a bookbinder. After studying at Marburg and at the University of Jena, he went to Leipzig as a private tutor; but in 1802 he was appointed professor at Marburg, and two years later professor of philology and ancient history at Heidelberg. He held the latter position for nearly forty-five years, with the exception of a short time spent at the University of Leiden, where his health was affected by the Dutch climate. He was one of the principal founders of the Philological Seminary established at Heidelberg in 1807. The Académie des Inscriptions et Belles-Lettres, Paris, appointed him one of its members, and from the Grand Duke of Baden he received the dignity of privy councillor.
Creuzer's first and most famous work was his Symbolik und Mythologie der alten Völker, besonders der Griechen[1] (1810–12, 2nd ed. 1819, 3rd ed. 1837), in which he maintained that the mythology of Homer and Hesiod came from an Eastern source through the Pelasgians, and reflected the symbolism of an ancient revelation; as a reconciliation with Judeo-Christian religion, it was, Walter Burkert has said, "the last large-scale and thoroughly unavailing endeavor of this kind."[2] This work ran counter to the ideology of romantic nationalism, which held literature and culture to be intimately connected with a Volk, epitomized by Karl Otfried Müller's concept of a Greek Stammeskultur, a Greek "tribal culture".[3] For this and the next generations, "origins and organic development rather than reciprocal cultural influences became the key to understanding."[4] Creuzer's work was vigorously attacked by Johann Gottfried Jakob Hermann in his Briefen über Homer und Hesiod, and in his letter, addressed to Creuzer, Über das Wesen und die Behandlung der Mythologie;[5] by Johann Heinrich Voss in his Antisymbolik; and by Christian Lobeck in his Aglaophamus. It was briefly praised, however, by Hegel in his Philosophy of Right.[6]
Creuzer's other works include:
- an edition of Plotinus
- a partial edition of Cicero, in preparing which he was assisted by Moser
- Die historische Kunst der Griechen (1803)
- Epochen der griechischen Literaturgeschichte (1802)
- Abriss der römischen Antiquitaten (1824)
- Zur Geschichte altrömischer Cultur am Oberrhein und Neckar (1833)
- Zur Gemmenkunde (1834)
- Das Mithreum von Neuenheim (1838)
- Zur Galerie der alten Dramatiker (1839)
- Zur Geschichte der classischen Philologie (1854).
See the autobiographical Aus dem Leben eines alten Professors (Leipzig and Darmstadt, 1848), to which was added in the year of his death Paralipomena der Lebenskunde eines alten Professors (Frankfurt, 1858); also Starck, Friederich Kreuzer, sein Bildungsgang und seine bleibende Bedeutung (Heidelberg, 1875).
Notes
- ↑ "Symbolism and mythology of the ancient peoples, particularly the Greeks"
- ↑ Burkert, Introduction to Greek Religion 1983:
- ↑ Müller even challenged the Semitic etymology of the name Kadmos, in Orchomenos und die Minyer (1820, 1844), as Burkert noted.
- ↑ Walter Burkert, The Orientalizing Revolution: Near Eastern Influence on Greek Culture in the Early Archaic Period 1992, p. 2.
- ↑ "On the character and treatment of mythology"
- ↑ Section 203; the history of this public dialogue is retraced in E. Howald, Der Kampf um Creuzers Symbolik1926.
References
This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "article name needed". Encyclopædia Britannica (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press.