Hoke v. United States
Hoke v. United States | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
Argued January 7–8, 1913 Decided February 24, 1913 | |||||||
Full case name | Effie Hoke and Basile Economides, Plaintiffs in Error, v. United States | ||||||
Citations | |||||||
Holding | |||||||
Though Congress could not regulate prostitution per se—as that was strictly the province of the states—it could regulate interstate travel for purposes of prostitution or “immoral purposes.” | |||||||
Court membership | |||||||
| |||||||
Case opinions | |||||||
Majority | McKenna |
Hoke v. United States, 227 U.S. 308 (1913), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court, which held that the United States Congress could not regulate prostitution per se, as that was strictly the province of the states. Congress could, however, regulate interstate travel for purposes of prostitution or “immoral purposes.” It upheld the Mann Act.
See also
Further reading
Wikisource has original text related to this article: |
- Keire, Mara L. (2001). "The Vice Trust: A Reinterpretation of the White Slavery Scare in the United States, 1907-1917". Journal of Social History. Journal of Social History, Vol. 35, No. 1. 35 (1): 5–41. doi:10.1353/jsh.2001.0089. JSTOR 3789262.
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 1/29/2015. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.