Integrity management

Integrity management consulting is an emerging sector of consultancy that advises individuals and corporations on how to apply the highest ethical standards to every aspect of their business. At the core of integrity management is the belief that companies have a strong interest, as well as a responsibility, to act with integrity at all times. This field arose in response to (a) the increased perception that companies are more likely to succeed when they act with integrity and (b) increased awareness by company directors of the need to seek expert advice to help them align and incorporate high ethical standards with business strategy and integrate them across all operational functions.

In recent years, the general public have become both better informed and more concerned about business ethics at home and in developing countries. As a result governments have been called on to legislate, and business leaders to innovate, to ensure that high ethical standards are put at the heart of business and industry.

The field of integrity management aims to address:

  1. The demand for companies to respond to increasing awareness of ethical misconduct and resulting expectations for transparency and accountability;
  2. The requirement for companies to comply with a stricter legal framework and avoid prosecution for unethical behaviour; and,
  3. The desire for executives to make their enterprises leaders in responsible and sustainable development.

Increased public awareness and expectations

Media attention given to ethical lapses means that companies are increasingly being held responsible for unethical behaviour including corruption, labour issues and the poor working conditions in their own operations, in those of their subsidiaries, as well as for the actions of subcontractors acting on their behalf. An early example of the demand for responsibility starting to take hold was in the early 1990s when the reputation of a major footwear corporation was severely damaged, the brand devalued, and the company subjected to consumer boycotts after the discovery of the supplier’s poor labour standards. Child labour watchdogs found children as young as 10 working for Nike making shoes, clothing and footballs in Pakistan and Cambodia.[1]

Appalling workplace conditions have existed for centuries. However, the media has now made ethical transgressions readily public. In fact, according to a briefing by the Institute of Business Ethics, in 2009 there were 25 media stories on corporate ethical lapses in the extractive industries alone. Reported issues for this sector included environmental matters and allegations of human rights abuses in emerging markets, as well as accusations that oil companies were dumping toxic material in West Africa. The briefing also highlighted the amount of negative media attention given to the wider retail sector in 2009. Numerous stories exposed unethical practices, such as exploiting sweatshop labour, and accused some retailers of posing a danger to indigenous communities in Africa.[2]

The impact of such negative exposure can include:

According to Transparency International (TI), which investigates business corruption across the globe, bribery and corruption were partly to blame for the recent global economic crisis. The conditions cited included: serious lapses in corporate due diligence, governance and integrity; poor transparency and accountability; and, inadequate corporate integrity systems.[3] The worldwide recession has furthered the public’s demand for businesses to behave responsibly.

More stringent legal requirements

Stricter legal frameworks have made it easier to prosecute transgressors and new international initiatives are helping countries to work in collaboration to deter poor business ethics.

The OECD Anti-Bribery Convention (officially OECD Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions) is a convention of the OECD, ratified by 38 countries and aimed at reducing corruption in developing countries by encouraging sanctions against bribery in international business transactions carried out by companies based in member countries. Countries that have signed the Convention are required to put in place legislation that criminalises the act of bribing a foreign public official. Much of the legislation passed by member countries has international reach.

One such example is the Bribery Act 2010 which was enacted into law on 8 April and defines three discrete criminal offences: offering or paying a bribe; requesting or receiving a bribe; bribing a foreign public official. (A specific offence required to comply with the OECD Convention mentioned above); and a new corporate offence of failing to prevent bribery being undertaken on its behalf. The Act applies to UK companies, UK partnerships, UK citizens and individuals ordinarily resident in the UK, regardless of where the relevant act occurs. They also apply to non-UK nationals, companies, and partnerships if an act or omission forming part of the offence takes place within the UK.

The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977(FCPA)(15 U.S.C. §§ 78dd-1, et seq. is a United States federal law with international reach which also targets unethical behaviour. The Act is known primarily for two of its main provisions: one that addresses accounting transparency requirements under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and, another concerning bribery of foreign officials. The FCPA applies to individuals and businesses with securities registered in the United States or a principal place of business in the United States. While this Act has been in existence for quite some time, the SEC and the DOJ have recently increased their enforcement efforts.

A well-known, recent example of a company prosecuted under the FCPA is German car maker, Daimler, which has agreed to pay $185m in fines to the US government over alleged bribes paid to secure contracts abroad.[4] BAE Systems PLC, a UK-based defence contractor has also agreed to pay a $400 million fine in FCPA related enforcement action. There are numerous other examples. Moreover, the US Department of Justice has announced it is expanding the unit which enforces the FCPA by as much as 50%,[5] and the SEC newly created FCPA unit will continue its efforts as well.[6]

Most recently, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (also known as the Financial Reform Act) signed into U.S. law by President Barack Obama on July 21, 2010 contains a clause that specifically requires companies with products containing cassiterite (tin ore), columbite-tantalite (coltan), wolframite, and gold to disclose to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) whether the minerals are sourced from the Democratic Republic of Congo or adjoining countries. Companies will have to detail the measures they have taken to avoid sourcing the minerals from Congolese armed groups, which are guilty of massacres and other atrocities. The bill also requires that all information disclosed be independently audited.

This legislation underpins some of the reasons businesses are taking integrity seriously and enlisting integrity management consultancies. Many businesses leaders have realized that early adopters of strong corporate ethics will thrive, as did those quick to embrace the environmental agenda in recent years. Consumers and shareholders are increasingly ready to recognise the value of corporate responsibility in international business. Increasingly, responsibility and sustainable value are intertwined.

Role of consultancies

In response, the field of integrity management has been born to help clients conduct business, even in the most challenging of markets, without compromising their ethics. With the help of expert advice, companies can go beyond abiding by the law to taking a voluntary, proactive approach to ensuring a company’s activities promote behaving responsibly, with fairness, sustainability, and cultural sensitivity in the communities in which they operate. It is very different in this respect from the more reactive field of risk management, although some risk management companies have attempted to embrace ethical risk as an area of specialism. Many risk management consultancies are adjuncts to private security companies. Therefore, some would-be clients are not convinced that they are best-placed to assist in the area of integrity and ethical management, because their parent companies face reputational challenges themselves.

Specialist integrity management consultancy helps business leaders not only to avoid business practices that represent risk to an industry or economy, but also helps to bring such practices under scrutiny so that they can be brought to a quick end.

The practice of integrity management consultancy combines numerous disciplines including established Knowledge Acquisition Methodologies, Public Relations Practices, Business Risk Management techniques, Corporate Social Responsibility, Compliance functions, Insider Threat detection and Financial expertise to help clients make responsible and ethical business decisions.

Integrity management consultancies offer services such as: Identifying potential reputational and ethical threats for clients, and developing practical recommendations to mitigate these threats; making recommendations for, and carrying out due diligence on, local professional service suppliers; providing advice on accessing a local pool of talent, and addressing cultural considerations for building an effective local workforce; conducting detailed investigations into proposed local partners and key employees; preparing community needs reviews for better targeting of CSR programmes; and, administering anti-and counter-corruption training. Many also offer general ethics audits so that companies can obtain independent verification to attest to the high standard of their corporate ethics. Of course, this is not an exhaustive list as each consultancy offers different services.

References

  1. ↑ Boggan, Steve. "Nike admits to mistakes over child labour." The Independent 20 October 2001. . 4 July 2010 <http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/nike-admits-to-mistakes-over-child-labour-631975.html>.
  2. ↑ Institute of Business Ethics. Concerns & Ethical Lapses, 2009. Issue 15, February 2010
  3. ↑ “Transparency International”. Transparency International’s Global Corruption Report 2009
  4. ↑ Clark, Andrew. "Daimler settles US bribery charges." The Guardian 24 March 2010. Business. 4 July 2010 <http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2010/mar/24/daimler-settles-us-bribery-charges>
  5. ↑ Hechler, David. "LAW.COM." DOJ Unit That Prosecutes FCPA to Bulk Up 'Substantially'. 26 February 2010. ALM. 1 August 2010 <http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202444612530&pos=ataglance&src=EMC-Email&et=editorial&bu=Law.com&pt=LAWCOM%20Newswire&cn=NW_20100226&kw=DOJ%20Unit%20That%20Prosecutes%20FCPA%20to%20Bulk%20Up%20%27Substantially%27#>
  6. ↑ "Remarks Before the New York City Bar: My First 100 Days as Director of Enforcement by Robert Khuzami”. Speech by SEC Staff: New York, New York. August 5, 2009. www. Sec.gov. 1 August 2010. <http://www.sec.gov/news/speech/2009/spch080509rk.htm>

External links

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 9/9/2015. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.