Lulu (app)

Luluvise, Inc.[1]
Industry Social networking service, mobile app
Founder Alexandra Chong
Headquarters New York City, United States
Website onlulu.com

Lulu (formerly Luluvise) is a mobile app available for iOS and Android that allows female users to make positive and negative evaluations of male users on the basis of their romantic, personal, and sexual appeal. The app allows only female users to access the evaluation system, and evaluations made through the app are attached publicly and anonymously. The New York Times described the service as a "'Take Back the Internet' moment for young women who have come of age in an era of revenge porn and anonymous, possibly ominous suitors".[2]

On 2015 the app moved away from Facebook, and currently only allows registration via mobile phone numbers, for both male and female users.

Lulu describes itself as "a private network for girls to express and share their opinions openly and honestly"[3] about the weaknesses and strengths of the manners, appearances, spending habits, and career ambitions of their male acquaintances. The company's expansion of its user base focuses heavily on recruiting undergraduate[4] members of American all-female sororities, which commentators describe as reflected in the "app's linguistic and visual design [which] is visibly influenced by US sorority culture."[5]

The app has been highly controversial, and the functionalities offered by the app are frequently described negatively in the popular press as "sexist and objectifying",[6] "nonconsensual",[7] and "shallow and mean".[8] Although female users cannot write their own comments to avoid bullying, the company's harshest critics hold that the pre-selected terms used within the app for evaluations in the form of hashtags are instrumental in "reinforcing completely horrible stereotypes",[9] accuse the site of tolerating a sexist double standard,[10][11] and liken the "candor"[12] for which the app aims to a form of public harassment.[13] The company's founder, Alexandra Chong, refers to the app's functionalities as "provocative" and "ground-breaking"[8] and the website holds that the multiple-choice nature of evaluations creates "a safe and positive place for girls and guys".[3]

The company has also been accused of inappropriate use of Facebook accounts' user data. Lulu does not query male Facebook users for their consent in integrating their profiles in the app, and at the time of its release the product caused notable social "recoil"[14] and received significant negative coverage in the press for its violation of Facebook's policies on the use of user data.[15] The company notes that its data collection policies are now in compliance with Facebook's Platform Policies. Also, it points out how users who have unwittingly been incorporated into Lulu's databases may contact their support center for the removal of their personal data.

Lulu was sold to Badoo in 2016.

History

Lulu was created by Alexandra Chong, a Chinese-Jamaican/Canadian from Ocho Rios and former Jamaican tennis Olympian who studied at Appalachian State University and received her LLB from the London School of Economics.[16][17] She has stated as her inspiration a "really funny" Valentine's Day date she went on in 2009, after which she wanted to be able to discuss details with her female friends without sharing information on Facebook.[18] In December 2011, after stints at Upstream and The Corporate Executive Board Company,[17] she launched Luluvise.com, which was succeeded in January 2013 by Lulu, then as a private, invitation-only app for female users at Florida State University and the University of Florida.[16] In February 2013 the app was released nationally in the US.[16] By April 2013 the app had 200,000 men listed and rated.[19] In November 2013, the app was covered by the New York Times,[5] at which point the company claimed more than a million users.[1] New York magazine reported in November 2013 that the average rating for male users on the app's 10-point numerical scale was 7.5 points.[14]

Current features

Female users answer multiple-choice questions about a man’s sense of humor, manners, ambition, commitment level, and look and style. Results are converted to a 0-to-10 rating, which constitutes a guy’s “score”. Unlike other review-based systems, they cannot add their own comments.

Male users on Lulu can add photos and hashtags to influence female users' opinion. They can edit any detail on their profiles, see their average score, how they perform across 7 categories, and which hashtags girls they know use to describe them. They can also acquire a subscription to see a more detailed breakdown of their scores.

Lulu has an online automatic self-removal tool that allows both male and female users to delete their account at their request and "blacklist" their mobile phone numbers. Their Support Center also mentions the inclusion of agree and disagree buttons let girls weigh in on the accuracy of each review.

In 2014 Truth Bombs was launched:[20] an anonymous forum where users can anonymously share their doubts and opinions about relationships and sex.

In 2015 the Private Chat feature was added[21] to the app as a main feature, allowing women “to make the first move”: female users can invite men they are interested in to a one-on-one conversation via their profiles or Truth Bombs.

Acquisition by Badoo

In February 2016, Badoo acquired Lulu and removed the app's ability to rate men.[22]

Controversy

The stock phrases and "coy euphemisms"[6] used within the app in the form of hashtags to evaluate users' male acquaintances have been noted by The Independent to evoke "stupid cookie-cutter men who can't feel or think and can be summarised in a few sassy phrases of cute girl-talk",[6] highlighting concerns that the app violates the bounds of social propriety and could be used to debase the social standing of users of whom it contains evaluations.

Lulu states that it aims to "unleash the value of girl talk" to empower its female reviewers.[3] Columnists dispute the app's stated aim to help "girls to make smarter decisions on topics [such as] relationships",[12] arguing that the "Lisa Frank girly fun" of the app and its pre-selected review terms prevent the service from meaningfully addressing a substantive topic such as dating abuse or sexual assault.[23] The Telegraph praised the app for “...making dating safer for women”.[24]

Critical reactions such as in Forbes note the a sexist double standard regarding the app: "If Lulu existed for men to rate women," columnist Kelly Clay notes, "it's likely that Apple would probably reject it from the app store."[25] The Daily Barometer likewise suggested that the app is degrading to both men and women, concurring that: "If there was a man’s version of Lulu, women would absolutely not stand for it."[8] Slate described the app as "creepy" and noted that "[u]nwelcomed sexual commentary isn't a compliment, it's harassment."[13] Forbes notes that Lulu "has enabled female millennials to think that digital revenge is acceptable ... and provided them a sleek platform to slander men."[25]

Lulu attracted attention after its release for how its initial collection of male Facebook users' data was at the time in violation of Facebook's Platform Policies.[15] The public nature of the app's negative evaluations has also sparked concerns that the evaluations could potentially be libelous in nature. According to the libel laws of the United Kingdom, observers note that it "could well be construed by a judge in a court of law that [an evaluation on the app] has 'lowered [the male Facebook user] in the minds of right thinking members of society'".[26] In response to such allegations, a Lulu representative responded at the time that they "have good legal counsel and guidelines in place" and "also have a takedown policy",[27] and the site notes that its present data collection does not violate Facebook's Platform Policies.[15] The Daily Mail has noted that the site's operators appear to "acknowledge the iffy morals behind [the] invention" and its continued data collection.[28] Lulu's terms and conditions likewise have referenced how "uploading or posting information about other individuals might encroach on the data protection rights of those individuals".[26]

See also

References

  1. 1 2 "Lulu". Google Play. 14 November 2013. Retrieved 20 November 2013.
  2. ↑ Schoeneman, Deborah. "What's He Really Like? Check the Lulu App". The New York Times. Retrieved November 17, 2015.
  3. 1 2 3 "How Lulu works". Lulu.com. Luluvise Inc. Retrieved 21 November 2013.
  4. ↑ "Lulu: Fake feminism for the 'hashtag generation'". Zeynep Zileli Rabanea. Al Jazeera English. Retrieved 17 December 2013.
  5. 1 2 Schoeneman, Deborah. "What's He Really Like? Check the Lulu App". The New York Times. Retrieved November 13, 2015.
  6. 1 2 3 Jupp, Emily (6 February 2013). "Luluvise: Nobody—male or female—comes out of this boyfriend-rating app looking good". The Independent. Retrieved 21 November 2013.
  7. ↑ Hess, Amanda (7 February 2013). "Rating Men on Lulu Isn't Empowering. It's Creepy.". Slate Magazine. Retrieved 20 November 2013.
  8. 1 2 3 Strasbaugh, Werner (7 May 2013). "Lulu strikes OSU". The Daily Barometer. Retrieved 20 November 2013.
  9. ↑ Cardiff, Ashley (7 February 2013). "Review Men Like Restaurants With New Lulu App, The Yelp Of Romance (For Girls!)". The Gloss. Retrieved 20 November 2013.
  10. ↑ Griffin, Spencer (7 March 2013). "'Lulu' app shows social double standard". The Echo. Retrieved 20 November 2013.
  11. ↑ Kelly, Audrey (27 February 2013). "Lulu app supports double standard for objectification". The LU Chameleon. Retrieved 20 November 2013.
  12. 1 2 "About Us". Lulu.com. Luluvise Inc. Retrieved 21 November 2013.
  13. 1 2 Benedikt, Allison (7 February 2013). "Rating Men on Lulu Isn't Empowering. It's Creepy.". Slate. Retrieved 20 November 2013.
  14. 1 2 O'Connor, Maureen (13 November 2013). "The Nice Girls of Lulu, So-Called 'Yelp for Men'". New York Magazine. Retrieved 20 November 2013.
  15. 1 2 3 Scott, Tom (8 February 2012). "Luluvise's date-rating site shows where your Facebook data can end up". The Guardian. Retrieved 21 November 2013.
  16. 1 2 3 "Lulu, The Girls-Only App for Dating Intelligence, Launches in US Colleges". PR Newswire. UBM plc. Retrieved 28 January 2014.
  17. 1 2 "Alexandra Chong". The Huffington Post. TheHuffingtonPost.com, Inc. Retrieved 28 January 2014.
  18. ↑ "Lifestyle: Style Observer: Cocktails With - Alexandra Chong". The Jamaica Observer. 20 November 2011. Retrieved 28 January 2014.
  19. ↑ After Rebooting, Lulu Sees Its Database Of Guys App Hit 200K Users In 8 Weeks Across U.S. Campuses. TechCrunch (2013-04-09). Retrieved on 2013-07-30.
  20. ↑ Stampler, Laura. "Here Are The Strange Things Dudes Are Asking on Lulu's New Messaging Service". Time Magazine. Retrieved November 14, 2015.
  21. ↑ Kosoff, Maya. "Lulu, the app that lets women secretly rate men, now lets them send men anonymous messages too". Business Insider. Retrieved November 14, 2015.
  22. ↑ http://finance.yahoo.com/news/infamous-dating-app-lulu-for-rating-men-sells-to-badoo-201528005.html
  23. ↑ Friedman, Alex (1 May 2012). "Opinion: Lulu blurs line between networking and crazy". The Daily Reveille. Retrieved 20 November 2013.
  24. ↑ Buchanan, Daisy. "How rating men on a 'sexist' app is making dating safer for women". The Telegraph. Retrieved November 17, 2015.
  25. 1 2 Clay, Kelly (24 November 2013). "Why We Should All Be Scared Of Lulu App". Forbes. Retrieved 26 November 2013.
  26. 1 2 Phelps, Tony (11 February 2013). "Lulu—Review Guys, Violate Privacy, Have a Cosmopolitan". Consumer Privacy USA. Retrieved 20 November 2013.
  27. ↑ Butcher, Mike (13 December 2013). "Luluvise goes live, but will this girl-only site attract more legal ire than eyeballs?". TechCrunch. Retrieved 20 November 2013.
  28. ↑ Peppers, Margot (7 February 2013). "Forget Facebook stalking—new 'Yelp for rating men' lets women read anonymous reviews about single guys". Daily Mail. Retrieved 20 November 2013.
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 9/23/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.