Melbourne Corporation v Commonwealth
Melbourne Corporation v Commonwealth | |
---|---|
Court | High Court of Australia |
Full case name | The Lord Mayor, Councillors and Citizens of the City of Melbourne v The Commonwealth and Another |
Decided | 13 August 1947 |
Citation(s) | (1947) 74 CLR 31; [1947] HCA 26 |
Case history | |
Prior action(s) | none |
Subsequent action(s) | none |
Case opinions | |
(5:1) any Commonwealth law that is otherwise valid under a head of power in s51 or some other part of the Constitution if it denies the existence or ability of a State to govern itself or the federal structure of the Commonwealth or singles out any one State | |
Court membership | |
Judge(s) sitting | Latham CJ, Rich, Starke, Dixon, McTiernan, Williams JJ |
Melbourne Corporation v Commonwealth (1947) 74 CLR 31; [1947] HCA 26 (13 August 1947), also known as the Melbourne Corporation case or the State banking case, is an important case in Australian constitutional law. It stands for the proposition that there are limits on the scope of express Commonwealth legislative powers which can be implied from the federal character of the Constitution.
The Melbourne Corporation principle is an implied limit on Commonwealth legislative power under the Constitution of Australia. This is due to the express federal nature of the governmental structure described by the Constitution in having a federation of states combine into one Commonwealth.
The principle renders constitutionally invalid any Commonwealth law that is otherwise valid under a head of power in s51 or some other part of the Constitution if it:
- Denies the existence or ability of a State to govern itself or the federal structure of the Commonwealth; and
- Singles out States.
A recent case of Austin v Commonwealth (2003) conflated the original 2 limbed test of the original case into an expanded 1st limb so that a commonwealth law that affects a state's ability to administer itself is constitutionally invalid.
This constitutional protection is one of the few reliable protections in the Australian Constitution against legislative and executive power, the other main protection being the Chapter III Separation of Powers Doctrine.
See also
External links
- Full text of the decision
- Anne Twomey, 'Federal Limitations on the Legislative Power of the States and the Commonwealth to Bind One Another', Federal Law Review, Vol. 31 No. 3.