Positive Behavior Interventions and Supports

Positive Behavior Interventions and Supports (PBIS) is a set of ideas and tools that schools use to improve the behavior of students. PBIS uses evidence and data-based programs, practices and strategies to frame behavioral improvement in terms of student growth in academic performance, safety, behavior, and establishing and maintaining positive school culture. PBIS addresses the needs of at-risk students as well as the multi-leveled needs of all students in regards to behavior, which creates an environment for both teaching and learning to occur in schools. In contrast to PBIS, many schools used exclusionary discipline practices including detentions, suspension, or expulsions to separate students from the classroom and from peers. PBIS emphasizes preventing problem behaviors before they happen to increase the opportunity for students to learn by keeping them in the classroom. PBIS is a team-based framework for schools that borrows elements from response to intervention, an intervention that uses diagnostic data to develop personalized learning plans for all students.

Background

PBIS is an acronym for Positive Behavioral Intervention and Supports.[1] Effective classroom management and discipline are essential for teaching and learning. PBIS emphasizes the integrated use of classroom management and school-wide discipline strategies coupled with effective academic instruction to create a positive and safe school climate for all students. PBIS is based in a behaviorist psychology approach to improving student behavior, which means that teachers and students identify misbehavior, model appropriate behaviors, and provide clear consequences for behavior in the classroom context. In a PBIS model, schools must define, teach, and reinforce appropriate behaviors to ensure success. Research shows that punishing students inconsistently without a positive alternative, is ineffective and only offers short-term solutions.[2] Modeling and rewarding positive behaviors are more effective. The goal of PBIS is to establish a positive school climate. To do this, a continuum of behavior support has been established which can be applied at the school level (primary level), for small groups of students (secondary level), and for individual level (tertiary level).[2]

Core features

PBIS is not a packaged program for districts to purchase. Instead, it is a framework approach that helps schools to identify the key tasks in developing preventative positive behavior tailored to their own school. It is an approach defined by the following core design components.

Outcomes

The outcome is the goal for improved student behavior towards which the school community aims. The goals must be measurable, and must clearly be the result of implementing the PBIS model.[3] Outcomes of a successful PBIS framework with a school can be measured in both behavior data and academic achievement of the students in the school. The academic and behavior goals are often defined and supported by the students, families, and teachers in tandem for the program to succeed.[2]

Data

PBIS is grounded in the data being used for all levels of decision making.[4] The team often considers trends in numbers, locations of where problems occurred, which classes they occurred in, and individual students that were involved. Through the data, schools take stock of their current situation, pinpoint areas for change and or improvement, and evaluate the effects of current and future interventions.

Practices

This component refers to the evidence-based curriculum, instruction, interventions, and strategies implemented within the school, and are meant to create a common and shared understanding of expectations. These practices are introduced through the team after a review of the data.[3]

Systems

PBIS requires a review team of educators with buy-in from across the school and strong administrative support to design and enforce the PBIS system. The team is generally a representative group of all of the staff (classroom teachers, special education teachers, specialists, etc). In a secondary school, students could also be included as part of this team. The team creates the systems used by the remainder of the staff and the students they serve.[5]

Continuum of support

Each PBIS model uses a continuum of support. Students are assigned to a level on the continuum based on behavioral data and on the recommendation of the PBIS team. Most students are assigned to the Primary Level of support, which describes the general school context. As students struggle with the behavioral expectations of the model, they move toward levels that provide more support.

Tier 1: Primary Level (support for all)

The first level in PBIS is the universal level. In terms of PBIS, this refers to the school-wide expectations that are defined and taught to all school staff in each of the settings within the school. These expectations are developed by the team and taught to students by their regular classroom teachers, administrators or others who have contact with all students. Many schools who have adopted this framework use: Be Safe, Be Respectful, Be Responsible, but like all aspects, this is determined by the school. The fidelity of the expectations should be determined by the continuous collecting of data.[6] Along with the expectations, there should be a system of acknowledgement and reinforcement of expected behaviors.

The Core Principles of PBIS at the primary level are:

  1. schools can effectively teach appropriate behavior to all students
  2. intervene early
  3. use a multi-tier model
  4. use research-based interventions
  5. monitor student progress often
  6. use data to make decisions
  7. use assessments to screen, diagnose, and monitor progress

These principles make the PBIS program significant in that it makes it more proactive rather than reactive. Furthermore, PBIS helps schools develop a common language, common practices, and consistent application of positive and negative reinforcement at a school-wide level.[2]

Tier 2: Secondary Level (support for some)

Although the primary level is taught and reinforced with all students, there may be some students who need additional intervention for students with at-risk behaviors as determined by the data. Secondary prevention provides intensive or targeted interventions to support students not responding to the primary efforts. These behavioral interventions are taught by specialized staff like special educators, school psychologists, behavior interventionists, and counselors. Some examples of tier 2 behavior interventions are targeted social skill groups, behavior plans with continuous progress monitoring.

Tier 3: Tertiary Level (support for few)

PBIS also acknowledges that some students have high risk behaviors and need specialized, or individualized skill building practice due to exhibited habits of problem behavior. Tier 3 behavioral interventions involve a functional behavioral assessment (FBA) and an individualized plan of support which includes:

  1. new skills to replace problem behaviors
  2. reorganization of current environment or "triggers"
  3. procedures for monitoring, evaluating, and reassessing the plan.

To succeed in a tier 3 intervention, both tier 1 and tier 2 interventions must also be in place. Also, support must be conducted in a comprehensive and collaborative manner.

The Tier 3 process should include the student with the behavior issue and the people who know them the best on a personal level working together as a behavioral support team (BST). Support should be tailored to the student’s specific needs. It should also include multiple interventions. The goal at this level is to diminish problematic behavior, increase adaptive skills, and attempt to increase the student’s quality of life.[2]

Alternatives to PBIS

Culturally responsive PBIS

Culturally responsive PBIS (CR-PBIS) is also a framework aimed at restructuring school culture much like PBIS. However, CR-PBIS emphasizes change through understanding and interacting with the community. Providing an environment in which all cultures are acknowledged, respected, and celebrated is important in building the bridge between home culture and school culture. To ensure all students succeed, an understanding of their various cultural beliefs and practices are a must. When someone engages in culturally responsive practice, they are forming an understanding about the values, beliefs, and behaviors of other people than themselves.

Race has been a predictor of success in schools for decades. Students of color have statistically lower rates of success. Part of the job of educators is to help bridge the social understanding gap in order to bridge the educational understanding gap.[7] Because of this, there is some concern that PBIS alone creates outcome disparities due to culture. The behavior of students with color, without the knowledge of the community they come from, may be seen as disruptive, resistant, and limiting to student success. CR-PBIS tries to address these concerns that are left untouched by the traditional PBIS framework by including families as a large piece of creating an environment for teaching and learning.

Responsive Classroom

Just like PBIS, Responsive Classroom (RC) centers on research-based approaches and strive to ensure high quality education to all students.[8] Both agree that these positive behaviors and the skills needed to reach them must be explicitly taught to students. Lastly, both also believe that non-punitive strategies are more effective than what has been used in schools in the past.

Where PBIS is a framework that coaches the school staff to create their own resources and changes, RC outlines specific practices that schools should use to reach this goal. It is a program that staff can be trained in at multiple levels and has published tools and strategies for meeting these goals with students. Within this outline of practices, RC encourages teachers and leaders to provide students with intrinsic motivation to continue to make positive behavior choices. This is a huge shift from PBIS which supports, but does not mandate, the use of extrinsic rewards as motivation.

Critiques

PBIS school-wide programs have been found effective. In a research study by Bradley et. al (cited in Sanfelippo), over 7,400 schools nation-wide use PBIS. The classrooms using the system saved up to 20 hours of teaching time per week for students who usually missed class for behavior issues. Another study done by Luiselli, Putnam, Handler, and Feinberg (cited in Sanfelippo), found that PBIS helped increase reading and math scores. Other studies have shown significant success with the combination of PBIS and best teaching practices.[9]

There have been 16,000 school teams trained in PBIS. Of these teams, there are 3 states with more than 60% of schools using PBIS, 9 states with 40%, and 16 states with 30%. When PBIS is effective, more than 80% of students and staff have indicated improvement in behavior, there are high rates of positive and safe environments, and 70–80% of students have reduced discipline referrals. Since the 1980s, there have been a number of studies documenting the positive effects of PBIS used school-wide.[10]

Notes and references

  1. ↑ Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction (DPI) (n.d.). "Positive behavioral intervention and supports (PBIS)". Retrieved March 9, 2015.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 Bradley, Renee (2015). "Positive behavioral interventions and supports (PBIS)". U.S. Department of Education (OSEP Technical Assistance Center). Retrieved March 9, 2015.
  3. 1 2 Student Services (2015). "Positive behavior interventions & supports (PBIS): What is PBIS?" Retrieved March 9, 2015.
  4. ↑ Bradley, Renee (2015). "Positive behavioral interventions and supports (PBIS)". U.S. Department of Education (OSEP Technical Assistance Center). Retrieved March 9, 2015.
  5. ↑ Colvin, G. & Fernandez, E. (2000). "Sustaining effective behavior support systems in an elementary school". Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions. 2 (4): 251–253. doi:10.1177/109830070000200414.
  6. ↑ Galloway, R., Panyan, M., Smith, C. & Wessendorf, S. (in press) Systems change with school-wide positive behavior supports: Iowa’s work in progress. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions.
  7. ↑ Wisconsin PBIS Network (2015) "Culturally Responsive Practices". Retrieved April 2, 2015.
  8. ↑ Center for Responsive Classroom (n.d.). "Responsive classroom and PBIS: Can schools use them together?" Retrieved March 9, 2015.
  9. ↑ Sanfelippo, J. (2012). Setting the stage: An evaluation of PBIS implementation in elementary schools: A mixed methods study. Cardinal Stritch University, College of Education and Leadership. Retrieved April 28, 2015.
  10. ↑ Sugai, G. & Simonsen, B. (2012). "Positive Behavior interventions and supports: History, defining features, and misconceptions". Center for PBIS & Center for Positive Behavior Interventions and Supports. Retrieved April 28, 2015.
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 11/17/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.