Rover 75
Rover 75 | |
---|---|
Pre-facelift Rover 75 | |
Overview | |
Manufacturer |
Rover MG Rover |
Production | 1998–2005 |
Model years | 1999–2005 |
Assembly |
Cowley, Oxford, United Kingdom Longbridge, Birmingham, United Kingdom |
Designer | Richard Woolley |
Body and chassis | |
Class | Compact Executive (D) |
Body style |
4-door saloon 5-door estate |
Layout | |
Platform | Rover R40 |
Related |
MG 7 MG ZT Roewe 750 |
Powertrain | |
Engine |
1.8 L Rover K Series 1.8 L Rover K Series Turbo 2.0 L BMW M47 Diesel 2.0 L Rover KV6 2.5 L Rover KV6 4.6 L Ford Modular V8 |
Transmission |
5-speed manual 5-speed automatic |
Dimensions | |
Wheelbase |
2,746 mm (108.1 in) (saloon, estate) 2,946 mm (116.0 in) (limousine) |
Length |
4,747 mm (186.9 in) (saloon) 4,791 mm (188.6 in) (estate) 4,950 mm (194.9 in) (limousine) |
Width | 1,778 mm (70.0 in) |
Height | 1,424 mm (56.1 in) |
Curb weight | 1,370–1,600 kg (3,020–3,530 lb) |
Chronology | |
Predecessor |
Rover 600 Rover 800 |
Successor | Roewe 750 |
The Rover 75 is an executive car produced by British automobile manufacturers Rover Group and later by MG Rover, under the Rover marque. The Rover 75 was available with front-wheel drive in either a saloon or estate body style and latterly, in long-wheelbase form and a rear-wheel drive, V8-engined specification. In 2001, an MG-branded version was launched by MG Rover, called the MG ZT.
Rover 75s were built by the Rover Group at Cowley, Oxfordshire, for just a year. After owner BMW divested its interests in Rover, the 75 was built by the new MG Rover Group at their Longbridge site in Birmingham.
The Rover 75 was unveiled to the public at the 1998 Birmingham Motor Show, with deliveries commencing in February 1999. Production of the Rover and later MG badged models ceased on 8 April 2005 when manufacturer MG Rover Group entered administration.
History
The Rover 75 started life as part of a group of three new designs[1] for the company under the guidance of Richard Woolley; a large saloon codenamed Flagship, a smaller vehicle (with the codename of Eric), and the 75. Of these only the 75 concept progressed. The initial aim was to re-skin the Rover 600[2] but following the BMW takeover it was quickly decided that this platform would not be re-used but replaced by an entirely new model.
Work on the new model, codenamed R40, progressed well with little operational interference from BMW; the styling received an enthusiastic response from the management and both companies believed the classical look would be the ideal direction for Rover. Revolutionary new design processes were adopted, including the 3D virtual reality assembly simulation "ebuild" techniques, ensuring the car would achieve class leading build quality when series production started.
Under the lauded styling was a range of petrol and diesel engines from 1.8- to 2.5-litre sizes. Petrol engines provided were Rover's 4-cylinder K series in 1.8-litre guise and the quad cam KV6, offered in either short-stroke 2.0 or revised 2.5-litre formats. The 2.0-litre was later dropped on introduction of the 1.8-litre turbo for emissions purposes.
Transmissions on all models were either the Getrag 283 5-speed manual, supplied from the company's new facility in Bari, Italy, or the JATCO 5-speed automatic unit—one of the first transverse engine deployments made with this feature.
Braking was in the form of all-round discs, complemented with a Bosch 5.7 4-channel ABS system and electronic brake force distribution. The parking brake was a cable operated drum integral within the rear discs.
Suspension was a MacPherson strut arrangement at the front, anchored by lower alloy L-arms. The wide spacing of the mounting points, compliant bushings and a perimeter subframe gave the model a cushioned yet precise ride with relaxed handling that could be tuned for different markets or model derivatives such as the later MG ZT. The rear suspension, after a period of uncertainty during development, was eventually a version of BMW's Z-Axle arrangement first featured on the 1988 Z1 sports car.
At the time of the launch there had been speculation within the media that the Rover 75 used the BMW 5-Series platform, perhaps due to the overall size of the model, the apparent presence of a transmission tunnel and the use of the parent company's rear suspension system. This was in fact not the case: Rover engineers had used the concept of incorporating a central tunnel which had been explored by BMW as part of their own research into front-wheel-drive chassis design. As the 75 took shape, this core engineering was passed over to Rover and evolved into the Rover 75 structure . The tunnel concept, along with the rear suspension system, was also used by the Rover engineers for the design of the Mini.
At launch the Rover 75 quickly attracted praise for its styling and design integrity. Some critics of the car labelled its styling too "retro", suggesting it had been designed with an older buyer in mind, and was not sporting enough when compared to the competition. However, the 75 won a series of international awards including various "most beautiful car" awards, including one in Italy.[3][4]
Assembly originally took place at Cowley but in 2000, following the sale of the company by BMW to Phoenix Venture Holdings, production was moved to Longbridge in Birmingham, England.[5] 2001 saw the introduction of the Rover 75 Tourer (developed alongside the saloon but never authorised for production by BMW), swiftly followed by the MG ZT and MG ZT-T, more sporting interpretations of the model, differentiated by modified, sporting chassis settings and colour and trim derivatives . Between 2000 and 2003, there were few changes to the range: the most significant was the replacement of the 2-litre V6 engine by a low-pressure-turbocharged version of the 1.8-litre 4-cylinder engine. The introduction of the 'greener' 1.8-litre turbo greatly benefited British company car drivers who are taxed on carbon dioxide emissions. A customisation programme, Monogram, was launched, allowing buyers to order their car in a wider range of exterior paint colours and finishes, different interior trims and with optional extras installed during production . Rather surprisingly, it was offered for sale in Mexico, making it the first Rover to be sold in North America since the Sterling.
From June 2002 a factory-approved dual fuel petrol-liquid petroleum gas conversion was available in the UK on 1.8 and 2.5 litre models. The LPG conversion was an after-market undertaking approved by MG Rover. Developed by EcoGas Systems Ltd and Landi Renzo S.R.L. in conjunction with MG Rover Powertrain Limited, the conversion was ordered from Rover dealerships, the cars retaining the three-year factory warranty. The retail price of the conversion was £2,195, but in an effort to encourage LPG use for transport for ecological reasons the UK Government offered a Powershift Rebate of some 60% of the conversion cost. When running on LPG the Rover 75 suffers only a slight reduction in performance compared to running on petrol; LPG fuel consumption is also slightly higher than when running on petrol but this is more than offset by the greatly reduced cost of the fuel.
Engineering
The 75 is engineered to a very high standard and has a torsional rigidity rating of 24,250 N·m per degree.[6] The 75's construction was stronger than that of Audi's A4 or the contemporary BMW 3-Series.[7] The high strength was partly a result of the large tunnel that spans the length of the Rover designed platform (designated R40) as well as the "ring of steel" around each door frame and box beams in the floor.
Tourer
Rover released the estate body-style of the 75, called Tourer, in 2001. It was designed to offer Rover customers a greater degree of practicality while retaining the 75's sleek looks and high-class image. The tailgate is fitted with a separate opening rear screen, allowing owners to drop items into the boot, without having to lift up the whole door. Once the door is opened, however, the load space is up to 1,480 mm wide and 2,060 mm long.[8] With the seats up there is a competitive 400 to 680 litres of cargo space, and with the seats folded down (in a 60:40 ratio complete with centre load-through hatch) there is 1,222 litres available, making it more of a 'lifestyle' estate than all-out load lugger.
Vehicle | Saloon | Estate |
---|---|---|
Rover 75 | 432 L | 400 L - 1,222 L |
Alfa Romeo 156 | 378 L | 360 L - 1,180 L |
Audi A4 | 440 L | 390 L - 1,250 L |
Jaguar X-Type | 452 L | 465 L - 1,415 L[9] |
Lexus IS | 400 L | 343 L - 1,000 L |
Mercedes-Benz C-Class | 430 L | 465 L - 1,510 L |
Saab 9-3 | 425 L | 419 L - 1,273 L |
To improve practicality further, self-levelling rear suspension and an integral load restraint system were added to the options list for the Tourer. Up to 100 kg can be loaded onto the roof, which is more than rival executive cars of the time,[8] and putting loads into the boot is made easier by the 544 mm sill height. Four hinged chrome lashing eyes are fitted to the floor, and oddment stowage compartments and two recessed hooks are located in the side walls.
Long wheelbase
A stretched version of the Rover 75—initially called Vanden Plas, then simply Limousine—was introduced in 2002. Developed in conjunction with specialist vehicle builder S. MacNeillie & Son Limited in Walsall, England, the model was stretched by 200 mm in the rear floor pan, with longer rear doors. The extra length, and the fitment of the new premium grille were the only visual clues to the changes made. Available only in Connoisseur specification, production moved to Longbridge after an initial short run by the coach-building partner.
The 75 has been one of the most popular ministerial cars in the British Government. Various ministers were driven around in Rover 75s and Tony Blair had access to a 75 Limousine while he was in power, but was never seen in it.[10] However Alistair Darling was seen in a 'Premium Grille' Rover 75 which could be the 75 Limousine in question.
Rover V8
Rover announced the new V8 model at the Geneva Motor Show also in 2004. This was the second iteration of the modified rear-wheel-drive platform developed by MG Rover and already receiving plaudits from the media. The car also boasted a new grille stretching down from the bonnet shut-line to the bottom lip of the bumper—a style that had also just appeared on Audi's A6, which was not lost on the press.
The Rover 75 V8 was created as a means of proving MG Rover's engineering expertise and to attract a development partner to the company. The car was extensively re-engineered to accommodate Ford's Modular V8 in 4.6 litre capacity, driving the rear wheels to give a car with much higher performance, taking advantage of the stiffening tunnel in the body structure.[11] These cars were built on the standard production line, and then removed to allow the necessary structural modifications to be carried out. The cars were then returned to the trimming lines for completion. Just under 900 were produced in both saloon and Tourer body styles, carrying either Rover 75 or MG ZT trim. The cars had numerous differences to the standard versions, drive train notwithstanding, with non standard heating and ventilation, and brakes and suspension capable of dealing with the extra power . Externally, there is little to indicate what is under the bonnet, other than quad exhaust pipes and a couple of subtle badges, although a large 'premium' grille was fitted to the Rover which, unlike the MG ZT, only appeared in facelifted form.
A heavily modified MG ZT-T V8, known as the X-15 broke the speed record for a non-production estate car on Bonneville Salt Flats in September 2003, achieving 225.609 mph (363.082 km/h). The engine was bored out to 6 litres producing 765 bhp (570 kW; 776 PS), but remained normally aspirated.
Facelift
Exterior
In early 2004 Rover facelifted the design of the 75 to look less retro and more European. Changes were restricted to bolt-on components and some technical upgrades. At the front was a new, more angular bumper fitted with a mesh lower grille, bigger door mirrors, one-piece headlights with halogen projectors fitted as standard, revamped front and side indicators and fog lights as well as a larger yet sleeker chrome grille on top. The rear also featured a more modern bumper with a new chrome boot handle.[12]
Interior
Middle-specification Club trim was dropped, and on Connoisseur trim light oak wood took the place of the original walnut, which remained standard fitment on the entry-level Classic trim. Rover also added a new trim to the range called Contemporary which featured revised fittings such as larger alloy wheels, body colour exterior accents, black oak wood trim and sports seats as well as an altered equipment tally. The instrumentation and its back-lighting were modernised, the console texture finish was upgraded and the seat bolsters revised to offer more support. Access to the rear seats was improved and leg-room increased.[13]
Technical
Under the skin the steering feel was improved with the sportier ratio from the MG ZT taking place of the Mark I Rover 75's more relaxed set-up. The suspension was reworked to allow more travel and soften the ride while improving the responsiveness, giving the updated 75 sharper handling.[13]
Popularity
The public unveiling of the Rover 75 at the Birmingham Motor Show was over-shadowed by a speech by BMW chairman, Bernd Pischetsrieder, containing criticism of the British Government's attitude to financial assistance in the redevelopment of the Rover Longbridge factory (where the new Mini and R30 was to have been produced).[14] Press reaction interpreted this as saying that BMW were unhappy with continuing financial losses and were intending to close Rover down. This undoubtedly scared off many prospective buyers, despite the very positive reaction to the car itself. Indeed, it did (and still does) hold up very well with the Jaguar S-Type that was unveiled at the same show.
Sales picked up substantially during 2000, and it was Britain's fifth most popular new car in the month of April of that year. It was still selling reasonably well at the time of MG Rover's bankruptcy in April 2005, and only a small number of unsold 75s were still in stock by 2007, as Nanjing Automobile was preparing to re-open Longbridge.
Based on the combination of safety, performance and maintainability, the Rover 75 was found in 2011 to be the cheapest car to insure in the United Kingdom across all age groups.[15] Based on fuel efficiency and lower taxes, the Rover 75 was found in 2011 to be the most cost effective diesel in its class.[16]
The cars are still popular and actively supported by an active and growing Owners Club[17]
Appearances in popular culture
The Rover 75 was a familiar sight to Midsomer Murders viewers, with four versions featured from 1999 until 2005: three first generations and a second generation, all with high specification and painted dark colours.
A Mark I also appeared numerous times in the BBC television series Dalziel and Pascoe. Two were in Wedgewood Blue and one in Starlight Silver.
2004 French film thriller Feux Rouges (Red Lights) featured a Mark I Rover 75 1.8T extensively as the main character's vehicle.[18]
In 2005 a Rover 75 Mark 2 featured in V for Vendetta as a rapid response police car.[19]
Rover's 75 is extensively featured as police cars in films and television series, in both saloon and estate body styles, including The Inspector Lynley Mysteries,[20] Rebus,[21] 55 Degrees North,[22] Blue Murder,[23] Rosemary & Thyme,[24] The Day Britain Stopped,[25] Ultimate Force,[26] New Tricks,[27] Murphy's Law,[28] Silent Witness[29] and Life on Mars[30]
Production
Year | Production |
---|---|
1999 | 53,581 |
2000 | 31,545 |
2001 | 33,883 |
2002 | 32,123 |
2003 | 30,449 |
2004 | 24,156 |
2005 | 5,439 |
Total | 211,175 |
Flexible electronics design
The BMW electronics based Rover 75 incorporates the entire in-car entertainment system (radio function, navigation system, television and telecommunications systems) and is based on a very flexible automotive computer system from BMW.[31] As a result, the Rover 75 can be easily upgraded with the newest BMW technologies including BMW's Bluetooth system, the DVD based navigation system, and widescreen displays, as well as BMW's CD changers which play MP3s.[32]
Engine specifications
The Rover 75 (and MG ZT derivative) were powered by a combination of Rover's own petrol and LPG K-Series and KV6 engines as well as Ford's Modular V8 and BMW's M47 diesel engine. The latter was designated M47R to identify the unit as a Rover special, having been modified by Rover's engineers for transverse installation, with performance and refinement characteristics unique to Rover.[33]
Petrol engines | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Years | Made By | Model | Engine | Power | Torque | Top Speed | 0-62 mph |
Economy |
1998–2005 | Rover | 1.8 Manual | 1,798 cc - L4 - NA | 120 PS (88 kW) | 160 N·m (120 lb·ft) | 121 mph (195 km/h) | 10.9 s | 36.7 mpg-imp (7.7 l/100 km) |
1998–2005 | Rover | 1.8 Automatic | 1,798 cc - L4 - NA | 120 PS (88 kW) | 160 N·m (120 lb·ft) | 118 mph (190 km/h) | 12.3 s | 30.1 mpg-imp (9.4 l/100 km) |
1998–2002 | Rover | 2.0 V6 Manual | 1,998 cc - V6 - NA | 150 PS (110 kW) | 185 N·m (136 lb·ft) | 130 mph (210 km/h) | 9.6 s | 30.1 mpg-imp (9.4 l/100 km) |
1998–2002 | Rover | 2.0 V6 Automatic | 1,998 cc - V6 - NA | 150 PS (110 kW) | 185 N·m (136 lb·ft) | 127 mph (204 km/h) | 10.8 s | 27.5 mpg-imp (10.3 l/100 km) |
2002-2005 | Rover | 1.8 T Manual | 1,798 cc - L4 - TC | 150 PS (110 kW) | 215 N·m (159 lb·ft) | 130 mph (210 km/h) | 9.1 s | 36.3 mpg-imp (7.8 l/100 km) |
2002-2005 | Rover | 1.8 T Automatic | 1,798 cc - L4 - TC | 150 PS (110 kW) | 215 N·m (159 lb·ft) | 127 mph (204 km/h) | 9.7 s | 31.7 mpg-imp (8.9 l/100 km) |
1998–2005 | Rover | 2.5 V6 Manual | 2,498 cc - V6 - NA | 177 PS (130 kW) | 240 N·m (180 lb·ft) | 140 mph (230 km/h) | 8.2 s | 29.4 mpg-imp (9.6 l/100 km) |
1998–2005 | Rover | 2.5 V6 Automatic | 2,498 cc - V6 - NA | 177 PS (130 kW) | 240 N·m (180 lb·ft) | 134 mph (216 km/h) | 8.9 s | 26.9 mpg-imp (10.5 l/100 km) |
2002–2005 | Rover | 2.5 V6 Automatic LWB | 2,498 cc - V6 - NA | 177 PS (130 kW) | 240 N·m (180 lb·ft) | 134 mph (216 km/h) | 9.9 s | 26.6 mpg-imp (10.6 l/100 km) |
2003–2005 | Ford | 4.6 V8 Manual | 4,601 cc - V8 - NA | 260 PS (190 kW) | 410 N·m (300 lb·ft) | 155 mph (249 km/h) | 6.2 s | 23.1 mpg-imp (12.2 l/100 km) |
2003–2005 | Ford | 4.6 V8 Automatic | 4,601 cc - V8 - NA | 260 PS (190 kW) | 410 N·m (300 lb·ft) | 151 mph (243 km/h) | 7.0 s | 22.1 mpg-imp (12.8 l/100 km) |
LPG engines | ||||||||
Years | Made By | Model | Engine | Power | Torque | Top Speed | 0-62 mph |
Economy |
2002–2005 | Rover | 2.5 V6 LPG Automatic | 2,498 cc - V6 - NA | 177 PS (130 kW) | 240 N·m (180 lb·ft) | 134 mph (216 km/h) | 8.9 s | 21.3 mpg-imp (13.3 l/100 km) |
2002–2005 | Rover | 2.5 V6 LPG Automatic | 2,498 cc - V6 - NA | 177 PS (130 kW) | 240 N·m (180 lb·ft) | 134 mph (216 km/h) | 9.9 s | 21.3 mpg-imp (13.3 l/100 km) |
Diesel engines | ||||||||
Years | Made By | Model | Engine | Power | Torque | Top Speed | 0-62 mph |
Economy |
1998–2005 | BMW | 2.0 CDT Manual | 1,951 cc - L4 - TC | 116 PS (85 kW) | 260 N·m (190 lb·ft) | 120 mph (190 km/h) | 11.0 s | 51.4 mpg-imp (5.50 l/100 km) |
1998–2005 | BMW | 2.0 CDT Automatic | 1,951 cc - L4 - TC | 116 PS (85 kW) | 260 N·m (190 lb·ft) | 118 mph (190 km/h) | 12.2 s | 40.9 mpg-imp (6.91 l/100 km) |
1999–2005 | BMW | 2.0 CDTi Manual | 1,951 cc - L4 - TC | 131 PS (96 kW) | 300 N·m (220 lb·ft) | 121 mph (195 km/h) | 10.0 s | 50.0 mpg-imp (5.65 l/100 km) |
1999–2005 | BMW | 2.0 CDTi Automatic | 1,951 cc - L4 - TC | 131 PS (96 kW) | 300 N·m (220 lb·ft) | 118 mph (190 km/h) | 10.6 s | 40.9 mpg-imp (6.91 l/100 km) |
1999–2005 | BMW | 2.0 CDTi Automatic LWB | 1,951 cc - L4 - TC | 131 PS (96 kW) | 300 N·m (220 lb·ft) | 118 mph (190 km/h) | 11.8 s | 40.9 mpg-imp (6.91 l/100 km) |
Environmental impact
The Rover 75 compared favourably against contemporary rivals in terms of emissions. Each of the Rover 75's engines were analysed and given a score between 0 (cleanest) to 100 (dirtiest).[34]
Rover Vehicle | CO2 | Score | Rival Vehicle | CO2 | Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Petrol engines | |||||
Rover 75 1.8 | 184 g/km | 50[35] | Alfa Romeo 156 1.6 T.S. Volkswagen Passat 2.0 |
195 g/km 206 g/km |
52[36] 55[37] |
Rover 75 1.8 Automatic | 224 g/km | 60[38] | Mitsubishi Galant 2.0 Automatic Subaru Legacy 2.0 Automatic |
224 g/km 224 g/km |
60[39] 61[40] |
Rover 75 2.0 V6 | 225 g/km | 61[41] | Lexus IS 200 Subaru Legacy 2.5 |
233 g/km 230 g/km |
63[42] 62[43] |
Rover 75 2.0 V6 Automatic | 245 g/km | 65[44] | Mercedes-Benz C240 V6 TouchShift | 256 g/km | 68[45] |
Rover 75 1.8 T | 193 g/km | 52[46] | Honda Accord 2.0i VTEC Peugeot 406 2.2 |
209 g/km 210 g/km |
56[47] 57[48] |
Rover 75 1.8 T Automatic | 214 g/km | 59[49] | BMW 318i Automatic SAAB 9-3 1.8T Automatic |
220 g/km 221 g/km |
60[50] 59[51] |
Rover 75 2.5 V6 | 225 g/km | 61[52] | Mitsubishi Galant 2.5 V6 Vauxhall Vectra 2.6i V6 24v |
227 g/km 236 g/km |
61[53] 64[54] |
Rover 75 2.5 V6 Automatic | 249 g/km | 66[55] | Ford Mondeo 2.5i V6 Automatic Mazda Xedos 9 2.5 Automatic |
253 g/km 258 g/km |
68[56] 69[57] |
Rover 75 4.6 V8 | 314 g/km | 81[58] | Volkswagen Passat 4.0 W8 4MOTION | 317 g/km | 84[59] |
Rover 75 4.6 V8 Automatic | 319 g/km | 83[60] | Volkswagen Passat 4.0 W8 4MOTION Tiptronic | 312 g/km | 83[61] |
LPG engines | |||||
Rover 75 2.5 V6 LPG Automatic | 214 g/km | 51[62] | Volvo S60 2.4 Bi-Fuel LPG Geartronic | 227 g/km | 61[63] |
Diesel engines | |||||
Rover 75 2.0 CDT 116 | 163 g/km | 59[64] | Peugeot 406 2.0 HDi 90 SAAB 9-3 2.2 TiD |
150 g/km 164 g/km |
60[65] 65[66] |
Rover 75 2.0 CDT 116 Automatic | 190 g/km | 69[67] | Audi A4 1.9 TDI PD 115 Tiptronic | 184 g/km | 71[68] |
Rover 75 2.0 CDTi 131 | 163 g/km | 59[64] | Audi A4 1.9 TDI PD 130 Quattro Mercedes-Benz C220 CDI |
175 g/km 170g/km |
66[69] 63[70] |
Rover 75 2.0 CDTi 131 Automatic | 190 g/km | 69[67] | Ford Mondeo 2.0 TDCi 130 Automatic Vauxhall Vectra 2.2 DTi 16v Automatic |
203 g/km 208 g/km |
76[71] 75[72] |
Safety
The Rover 75 was designed with reinforced foot-wells, underfloor box beams, side impact bars and the aforementioned "ring of steel" around each door opening to prevent jamming in case of an impact.[73] Driver and front passenger head and side airbags are fitted as standard, with side head "windowbags" available as an option until 2005 when they became standard equipment. If the window airbags had been standard equipment at the time of its Euro NCAP crash test in 2001, it would have scored the full five stars for the adult occupant impact rating.[74] Also fitted are disc brakes all round, anti-lock brakes (ABS), electronic brakeforce distribution (EBD) with a traction control system (TCS) available as an option on 2.0 engines and above.[75] On models fitted with Rover's Hi-Line infotainment system, a speed warning indicator was also included. Additionally, electronic stability control (ESC) was due to be made standard fitment on the 75 from the 2006 model year onwards.[76]
The 75 underwent Euro NCAP and ANCAP car safety tests in 2001 and proved itself to be one of the safest cars in its class. It scored more points overall than the Audi A4,[77] BMW 3-Series,[78] Citroen Xantia,[79] Ford Mondeo,[80] Honda Accord,[81] Hyundai Sonata,[82] Jaguar X-Type,[83] Mazda 6,[84] Mercedes-Benz C-Class,[85]Nissan Primera,[86] SAAB 9-3,[87] Opel/Vauxhall Vectra,[88] Peugeot 406,[89] Toyota Avensis,[90] Volkswagen Passat[91] and Volvo S60[92] which were all on sale during the Rover 75's lifetime. The Rover 75 achieved the following ratings:
Euro NCAP 2001 75[93] | Points | Rating |
---|---|---|
Adult Occupant: | 30 out of 36 | |
Pedestrian Impact: | 13 out of 36 |
ANCAP 2005 75[94] | Points | Rating |
---|---|---|
Overall Score: | 29.78 out of 35 | |
Offset Impact: | 13.78 out of 16 | |
Side Impact: | 16.00 out of 16 | |
Bonus Points: | 0.00 out of 3 |
All seats have anti-submarine ramps and three-point inertia reel seat belts with pre-tensioners,[95] while the front seats get additional load limiters and automatic belt height adjustment as standard. In certain markets a seat belt reminder for the driver was fitted. Each seat has an adjustable head restraint with the front ones pivoting on SE models. Thatcham's NCWR organisation (New Car Whiplash Ratings) tested the Rover 75 and awarded it the following scores:
NCWR[96] | Score |
---|---|
Geometric: | G |
Dynamic: | M |
Overall: | M |
G = Good A = Acceptable M = Marginal P = Poor
Security
A perimetric (and optional volumetric) alarm, engine immobiliser and remote-control central locking with deadbolts are standard equipment on the 75. Alloy wheels are fitted with locking wheel nuts. Automatic locking when driving off is standard, but can be disabled by a dealer. On the inside is a master locking switch and the boot can only be opened by remote control or an interior button, although a mechanical cable-pull boot release mechanism is fitted as an emergency back-up on all Tourer models.[73] A battery back-up sounder and tracking device called Trackstar were available as options.[75]
The 75 was tested by Thatcham's New Vehicle Security Ratings (NVSR) organisation and achieved the following ratings:[97]
Saloon | Rating |
---|---|
Theft of car: | |
Theft from car: |
Tourer | Rating |
---|---|
Theft of car: | |
Theft from car: |
Models
1998 – 2003 (Mark I)
- Classic
- Classic SE
- Club
- Club SE
- Connoisseur
- Connoisseur SE
- Vanden Plas (LWB model)
2004 – 2005 (Mark II)
- Classic
- Connoisseur
- Connoisseur SE
- Contemporary
- Contemporary SE
- Limousine (LWB model)
2006 – on (Roewe 750)
- 1.8 Turbo Base (18K4G, modified Rover K-Series)
- 1.8 Turbo High-Line (18K4G, modified Rover K-Series)
- 2.5 Base (25K4F, modified Rover KV6)
- 2.5 High-Line (25K4F, modified Rover KV6)
Reviews
- Auto Trader [98]
'The 75's biggest problem was its image; potential buyers just assumed it was hopelessly outclassed by rivals. Nothing could be further from the truth though, as the car could compete on equal terms with some prestigious adversaries' - Honest John [99]
Positives: A fine looking car from all angles. Destined to become a classic
Negatives: Let down by cooling system problems on all K-Series engines, particularly the 1.8 - Parker's [100]
Pros: Rover refinement and heritage. Handsome looks and a charming, comfortable interior.
Cons: Mid-range Audi, BMW and Mercedes-Benz [rivals]. - RAC [101]
'The Rover 75 Tourer is one of those rare ... cars that retains a genuine sense of occasion whenever you get behind the wheel. The retro clocks and the buttoned down rectitude of the detailing all contributes to a huge feel good factor.' - Verdict On Cars [102]
'Recommended. The standard 75 has an elegance missing from German executive car rivals, with wood and leather harking back to a bygone age. The Tourer estate models are, surprisingly, even prettier and very practical indeed.' - What Car? [103]
For - It's excellent over long distances and smooths out bumps like a luxury car. It's cheap, well equipped and practical, and comes with olde-worlde charm.
Against - The rear seats are cramped and you get a much sharper drive from its German rivals. - Which? [104]
For: rock-bottom prices | strong diesel engine | lots of equipment | comfortable
Against: patchy reliability | hefty depreciation | no dealer network | limited warranty - Wise Buyer's [105]
'The elegant 75 showed that Rover ... could build a quality executive car that's refined, reliable, good to drive [with] real presence.'
Awards and accolades
1999
- What Car? – 'Car of the Year'[106]
- What Car? – 'Compact Executive Car of the Year'
- What Car? – 'Diesel Car of the Year'
- Auto Express – 'World Car'
- Journal/AA – 'Business Car of the Year'[107]
- Italy - 'World's Most Beautiful High Class Saloon'[107]
- Bild am Sonntag – 'Golden Steering Wheel Award'[107]
- The Society of Plastic Engineers – Innovative Use Of Plastic[107]
- British International Motor Show – Best Riding And Handling FWD Saloon In The World
- Japan – 'Import Car of the Year' (1999–2000)[108]
- Middle East Wheels & Gears – 'Car of the Year'
2000
- Middle East Wheels & Gears – 'Car of the Year'
- New Zealand's National Business Review – 'Car of the Year'
- Executive Class – 'Portuguese Car of the Year'
- What Car? – 'Compact Executive Car of the Year'
- 2000 'European Car of the Year' Awards: Only Executive Car Short Listed
- Used Car Buyer – 'Used Car of the Year'
2001
- Used Car Buyer – 'Used Car of the Year'
- Diesel Car Magazine – 'Compact Executive Car'
- JD Power Survey – Only European Car In The Top 5
2002
- Auto Express Used Car Honours – 'Best Diesel Car'
- Used Car Buyer – 'Best Used Medium Car'
- ITM – 'Car of the Year'[109]
- Australian Institute of Transport Management – 'Car of the Year'
2004
- Used Car Buyer – 'Used Car of the Year'
- Used Car Buyer – 'Best Used Family Car of the Year'
- Most Popular British Armed Forces Tax Free Car Purchase
2006
- Auto Express Driver Power – 'Best Ride Quality' (1st)
2007
- Auto Trader Used Car Awards – 'Best Family Car'
2010
- Auto Express Driver Power – 'Best Ride Quality' (2nd)[110]
2011
- Auto Express Driver Power – 'Best Ride Quality' (1st)[111]
Chinese production
Production of the Rover 75 and MG ZT ended when MG Rover Group went into administration in April 2005. The Rover 75 design was purchased by Shanghai Automotive Industry Corporation (SAIC) in early 2005, although the new MG Rover Group owner, Nanjing Automobile (Group) Corporation (NAC) acquired the tooling for the car. Both companies launched revised versions of the 75/ZT in China. SAIC's model was named the Roewe 750 (following the purchase of the Rover brand by Ford, the Roewe marque was created by SAIC for use worldwide) and NAC's the MG 7.
The Roewe brand and Roewe 750 were launched at the Beijing Motor Show in November 2006. The 750 is based on the long-wheelbase 75 platform, and engineering was completed by Ricardo 2010.[112]
The MG 7 was launched in March 2007.[113] NAC also introduced a long-wheelbase version of the MG 7, called the MG 7L.[114]
References
- ↑ "Interview with Richard Woolley - the 75 & ZT Owners Club". The75andztclub.co.uk. Retrieved 2010-10-03.
- ↑ "The Unofficial Austin Rover Web Resource". Austin-rover.co.uk. Retrieved 2010-10-03.
- ↑ "BBC News". BBC News. 1999-02-23. Retrieved 2010-10-03.
- ↑ "CarPages 1st January 2002". Carpages.co.uk. Retrieved 2010-10-03.
- ↑ "European Union Industrial Relations News". Eiro.eurofound.eu.int. 2000-05-28. Retrieved 2010-10-03.
- ↑ http://www.op316.com/rover/euroncap.htm
- ↑ http://youwheel.com/home/2016/06/20/car-body-torsional-rigidity-a-comprehensive-list/
- 1 2 http://rover75.bplaced.net/tourer.html
- ↑ http://www.autocar.co.uk/car-review/first-drives/jaguar-x-type-3.0-v6-estate
- ↑ "Auto Express Rover 75 Limousine Test". Autoexpress.co.uk. 2004-10-27. Retrieved 2010-10-03.
- ↑ "The Ultimate Resource for Rover 75". Rover75.eu. Retrieved 2010-10-03.
- ↑ http://www.roverklubben.se/en/a-facelift-for-rover-75.html
- 1 2 http://www.motoring.com.au/reviews/2004/medium-passenger/rover/75/rover-75-2004--4181
- ↑ "Page 4, Employment Security In The Aftermath Of The Break-Up Of Rover Group by Joy Batchelor, Warwick Business School, February 2001" (PDF).
- ↑ "The 10 cheapest cars to insure". Confused.com. 2011-09-21. Retrieved 2012-01-26.
- ↑ "Ten of the best used diesel cars to buy for fuel efficiency and lower taxes". 2011-11-17. Retrieved 2012-12-15.
- ↑ "Rover 75 & MG ZT Owners Club". The75andztclub.co.uk. Retrieved 2009-10-31.
- ↑ http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_4671-Rover-75-R40-2000.html
- ↑ http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_41397-Rover-75-R40-2005.html
- ↑ http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_78830-Rover-75-Tourer-R40-2004.html
- ↑ http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_96664-Rover-75-Tourer-R40.html
- ↑ http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_387809-Rover-75-R40-2004.html
- ↑ http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_119143-Rover-75-R40-2004.html
- ↑ http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_102075-Rover-75-R40-2001.html
- ↑ http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_522652-Rover-75-R40-1999.html
- ↑ http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_424425-Rover-75-R40-1998.html
- ↑ http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_535119-Rover-75-R40-1998.html
- ↑ http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_585653-Rover-75-R40-1998.html
- ↑ http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_537169-Rover-75-R40-1998.html
- ↑ http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0478942/
- ↑ "BMW Bus System" (PDF). Retrieved 2010-10-03.
- ↑ "Bimmernav". Bimmernav. Retrieved 2010-10-03.
- ↑ http://rover75.bplaced.net/powertra.html
- ↑ "Next Green Car". Retrieved 12 July 2012.
- ↑ http://www.nextgreencar.com/view-car/10119/MG%20ROVER-Rover-75-Saloon-1.8-Petrol-Manual-5-speed
- ↑ http://www.nextgreencar.com/view-car/39/ALFA%20ROMEO-156-Saloon-Petrol-Manual-5-speed
- ↑ http://www.nextgreencar.com/view-car/18487/VW-Passat-Saloon-2.0-115bhp--Petrol-Manual-5-speed
- ↑ http://www.nextgreencar.com/view-car/10127/MG%20ROVER-Rover-75-Saloon-1.8-from--Petrol-Automatic-5-speed
- ↑ http://www.nextgreencar.com/view-car/10377/MITSUBISHI-Galant-Saloon-2.0-EQUIPPE-Petrol-Automatic-4-speed
- ↑ http://www.nextgreencar.com/view-car/13741/SUBARU-Legacy-2.0-GL-Saloon-AWD-2001-Petrol-Automatic-4-speed
- ↑ http://www.nextgreencar.com/view-car/10123/MG%20ROVER-Rover-75-Saloon-2-Petrol-Manual-5-speed
- ↑ http://www.nextgreencar.com/view-car/7489/LEXUS-IS-Petrol-Manual-6-speed
- ↑ http://www.nextgreencar.com/view-car/13779/SUBARU-Legacy-2.5-GX-Saloon-AWD-2002-Petrol-Manual-5-speed
- ↑ http://www.nextgreencar.com/view-car/10134/MG%20ROVER-Rover-75-Saloon-2.0-from--Petrol-Automatic-5-speed
- ↑ http://www.nextgreencar.com/view-car/8572/MERCEDES-BENZ-C-Class-%28W203%29-Saloon-Petrol-Automatic-5-speed
- ↑ http://www.nextgreencar.com/view-car/10097/MG-ROVER-Rover-75-1.8-Petrol-Manual-5-speed
- ↑ http://www.nextgreencar.com/view-car/6451/HONDA-Accord-2.0i-VTEC-SE-Executive-+SatNav-5dr-2001-Petrol-Manual-5-speed
- ↑ http://www.nextgreencar.com/view-car/11085/PEUGEOT-406-Saloon-2.2-160bhp-Petrol-Manual-5-speed
- ↑ http://www.nextgreencar.com/view-car/10130/MG%20ROVER-Rover-75-Saloon-1.8-T-Petrol-Automatic-5-speed
- ↑ http://www.nextgreencar.com/view-car/3068/BMW-3-Series-E46-318i-Saloon-Petrol-Automatic-4-speed
- ↑ http://www.nextgreencar.com/view-car/12505/SAAB-9-3-Sport-Saloon-1.8-T-150hp-B207E--Petrol-Automatic-5-speed
- ↑ http://www.nextgreencar.com/view-car/10126/MG%20ROVER-Rover-75-Saloon-2.5-Petrol-Manual-5-speed
- ↑ http://www.nextgreencar.com/view-car/10388/MITSUBISHI-Galant-Saloon-2.5-V6-ELEGANCE-Petrol-Manual-5-speed
- ↑ http://www.nextgreencar.com/view-car/16526/VAUXHALL-Vectra-2.6i-V6-24v-Hatch-exc.GSi-2001-Petrol-Manual-5-speed
- ↑ http://www.nextgreencar.com/view-car/10138/MG%20ROVER-Rover-75-Saloon-2.5-from--Petrol-Automatic-5-speed
- ↑ http://www.nextgreencar.com/view-car/6302/FORD-Mondeo-2.5i-V6-Saloon-18in-tyre-pre-2004-Petrol-Automatic-5-speed
- ↑ http://www.nextgreencar.com/view-car/7756/MAZDA-Xedos-9-2.5-Petrol-Automatic-4-speed
- ↑ http://www.nextgreencar.com/view-car/10040/MG%20ROVER-MG-ZT-260-Petrol-Manual-5-speed
- ↑ http://www.nextgreencar.com/view-car/18517/VW-Passat-Saloon-W8-275ps--Petrol-Manual-6-speed
- ↑ http://www.nextgreencar.com/view-car/10142/MG%20ROVER-Rover-75-Saloon-V8-Petrol-Automatic-4-speed
- ↑ http://www.nextgreencar.com/view-car/18519/VW-Passat-Saloon-W8-Tiptronic-275ps--Petrol-Automatic-5-speed
- ↑ http://www.nextgreencar.com/view-car/10116/MG%20ROVER-Rover-75-Saloon-2.5-LPG-Automatic-5-speed
- ↑ http://www.nextgreencar.com/view-car/17138/VOLVO-S60-2.4-Bi-Fuel-LPG-2005-Petrol-Automatic-5-speed
- 1 2 http://www.nextgreencar.com/view-car/10115/MG%20ROVER-Rover-75-Saloon-2.0-D-96kW-Diesel-Manual-5-speed
- ↑ http://www.nextgreencar.com/view-car/11075/PEUGEOT-406-Saloon-2.0-Hdi-turbo-90bhp-Diesel-Manual-5-speed
- ↑ http://www.nextgreencar.com/view-car/12472/SAAB-9-3-Series-Diesel-Manual-5-speed
- 1 2 http://www.nextgreencar.com/view-car/10032/MG%20ROVER-MG-ZT-CDTi-96kW-Diesel-Automatic-5-speed
- ↑ http://www.nextgreencar.com/view-car/1314/AUDI-A4-Saloon-1.9-TDI-PD-SE-Tiptronic-115bhp-Std-SE-Sport-&-Quat-Diesel-Automatic-5-speed
- ↑ http://www.nextgreencar.com/view-car/1316/AUDI-A4-Saloon-1.9-TDI-quattro-130ps-Std-SE-&-Sport--Diesel-Manual-6-speed
- ↑ http://www.nextgreencar.com/view-car/8507/MERCEDES-BENZ-C-Class-%28W203%29-Saloon-C220-CDI-Diesel-Manual-6-speed
- ↑ http://www.nextgreencar.com/view-car/6113/FORD-Mondeo-2.0-TDCi-130ps-Saloon-18in-tyre-pre-2004-Diesel-Automatic-5-speed
- ↑ http://www.nextgreencar.com/view-car/16158/VAUXHALL-Vectra-2.2-DTI-16V-SXI-5dr-Hatch-2003-Diesel-Automatic-5-speed
- 1 2 http://www.yaym.co.uk/text/Rover/rover_gb_en_75_brochure.pdf
- ↑ http://www.euroncap.com/tests/rover_75_2001/91.aspx
- 1 2 http://www.xpowerforums.com/Acrobat/Rover%2075%20Price%20List.pdf
- ↑ http://forums.mg-rover.org/showpost.php?p=3093110&postcount=5
- ↑ http://www.euroncap.com/tests/audi_a4_2001/88.aspx
- ↑ http://www.euroncap.com/tests/bmw_3_series_2001/98.aspx
- ↑ http://www.euroncap.com/tests/citroen_xantia_1997/16.aspx
- ↑ http://www.euroncap.com/tests/ford_mondeo_2002/115.aspx
- ↑ http://www.euroncap.com/tests/honda_accord_2000/79.aspx
- ↑ http://www.euroncap.com/tests/hyundai_sonata_2006/272.aspx
- ↑ http://www.euroncap.com/tests/jaguar_x_type_2002/117.aspx
- ↑ http://www.euroncap.com/tests/mazda_6_2005/242.aspx
- ↑ http://www.euroncap.com/tests/mercedes_benz_c_class_1997/18.aspx
- ↑ http://www.euroncap.com/tests/nissan_primera_2002/135.aspx
- ↑ http://www.euroncap.com/tests/saab_9_3_2000/78.aspx
- ↑ http://www.euroncap.com/tests/opel_vauxhall_vectra_2002/118.aspxM
- ↑ http://www.euroncap.com/tests/peugeot_406_2001/105.aspx
- ↑ http://www.euroncap.com/tests/toyota_avensis_1998/110.aspx
- ↑ http://www.euroncap.com/tests/vw_passat_2001/92.aspx
- ↑ http://www.euroncap.com/tests/volvo_s60_2001/103.aspx
- ↑ "Rover 75; Euro NCAP – For safer cars crash test safety rating". Euro NCAP. Retrieved 2012-07-12.
- ↑ http://www.howsafeisyourcar.com.au/2005/Rover/75/Classic-4D-Sedan-5sp-auto-2_5L-V6-Petrol/
- ↑ http://www.rover-club.net/graphics/manuals/17/r75_technical_brochure.pdf
- ↑ "Safety | New Car Whiplash Ratings | Car Search | Thatcham MIRRC". Thatcham.org. Retrieved 2012-07-12.
- ↑ "New Vehicle Security Ratings | Car Search | Car Results | Thatcham MIRRC". Thatcham.org. Retrieved 2012-07-12.
- ↑ "Rover 75 - 10 Point Test". Auto Trader. Retrieved 2011-08-27.
- ↑ "Car-By-Car Reviews - Rover 75". Honest John. Retrieved 2013-09-04.
- ↑ "Reviews - Rover 75". Parker's Car Guides. Retrieved 2011-08-27.
- ↑ "Rover 75 Tourer Review - Car Reviews". RAC. Retrieved 2011-08-27.
- ↑ "MG Rover 75". Verdict On Cars. Retrieved 2011-08-27.
- ↑ "Rover 75 - New Car Review - What Car?". Whatcar.com. Retrieved 2014-05-02.
- ↑ "In-Depth Report - Rover 75" (PDF). Which?. Retrieved 2011-08-27.
- ↑ "Rover 75 Review". Wise Buyer's Guides. Retrieved 2011-08-27.
- ↑ http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/284492.stm
- 1 2 3 4 https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=2479&dat=20000113&id=9oc1AAAAIBAJ&sjid=jyUMAAAAIBAJ&pg=1230,25119801
- ↑ http://www.carenthusiast.com/news0412/rover_1.htm
- ↑ http://www.carpages.co.uk/mg_rover/mg_rover_75_itm_car_of_the_year_01_07_02.asp
- ↑ http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/best-cars/40918/best-ride-quality
- ↑ http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/best-cars/40937/best-ride-quality
- ↑ Adams, Keith (2008-09-20). "Roewe 750". AROnline. Retrieved 2009-03-11.
- ↑ "Chinese plant rolls out first MG". BBC News. 27 March 2007. Retrieved 2007-03-27.
- ↑ Ougarov, Kirill (2007-09-28). "MG 7 rolls out in China, TF roadster's UK launch delayed". Motor Trend. Retrieved 2009-03-13.
External links
Media related to Rover 75 at Wikimedia Commons