Slack v. McDaniel
Slack v. McDaniel | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
Argued October 4, 1999 Reargued March 29, 2000 Decided April 26, 2000 | |||||||
Full case name | Antonio Slack v. McDaniel, Warden, et al. | ||||||
Citations | |||||||
Court membership | |||||||
| |||||||
Case opinions | |||||||
Majority | Kennedy, joined by unanimous (part I); Rehnquist, O'Connor, Scalia, Thomas, Ginsburg (part II); Rehnquist, Stevens, O'Connor, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer (parts III, IV) | ||||||
Concurrence | Stevens, joined by Souter, Breyer | ||||||
Concur/dissent | Scalia, joined by Thomas |
Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473 (2000), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, a certificate of appealability must be issued by a circuit Justice of judge before an appeal can proceed. The certificate of appealability (COA) may only be issued if the applicant "has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right."[1]
References
- ↑ Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473 (2000)
External links
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 6/6/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.