Taifals

The dragon-and-pearl device of the shields of the Equites Honoriani Taifali iuniores unit based in Gaul. The dragon was blue, as was the "pearl" (the central boss). The band around the boss was red. The field was white.

The Taifals or Tayfals (Latin: Taifali, Taifalae or Theifali) were a people group of Germanic or Sarmatian origin, first documented north of the lower Danube in the mid third century AD. They experienced an unsettled and fragmented history, for the most part in association with various Gothic peoples, and alternately fighting against or for the Romans. In the late fourth century some Taifali were settled within the Roman Empire, notably in western Gaul in the modern province of Poitou. They subsequently supplied mounted units to the Roman army and continued to be a significant source of cavalry for early Merovingian armies. By the sixth century their region of western Gaul had acquired a distinct identity as Thifalia.

Settlement in Oltenia

Taifals in Oltenia and the political landscape in the 4th-century Balkans

One of the earliest mentions of the Taifals puts them in the following of the Gothic king Cniva when he campaigned in Dacia and Moesia in 250 and the years following.[1] They are sometimes classified as a Germanic tribe closely related to the Goths, although some believe they were related to the (non-Germanic) Sarmatians with whom they might have emigrated from the Central Asiatic steppes.[2]

In the late third century they settled on the Danube on both sides of the Carpathians, dividing the territory with the Goths, who maintained political authority over all of it.[3] In Spring 291 they formed a special alliance with the Gothic Thervingi, forming a tribal confederation from this date until 376,[4] and fought the Vandals and Gepids: Tervingi, pars alia Gothorum, adiuncta manu Taifalorum, adversum Vandalos Gipedesque concurrunt.[5][6] Along with the Victufali, the Taifals and Thervingi were the tribes mentioned as having possessed the former Roman province of Dacia by 350 "at the very latest".[6] Archaeological evidence suggests that the Gepids were contesting Transylvania, the region around the Someş River, with the Thervingi and Taifals.[6] The Taifals were subsequently made foederati of the Romans, from whom they obtained the right to settle in Oltenia.[7] They were at that time independent of the Goths.[8]

Buckle from the first hoard of Coşoveni, 5th century, possibly of Taifal origin,[9] from Coşoveni, Oltenia, Romania

In 328 Constantine the Great conquered Oltenia and the Taifals, probably taking this opportunity to resettle a large number in Phrygia, in the diocese of Nicholas of Myra.[10][11] In 332 he sent his son Constantine II to attack the Thervingi, who were routed. According to Zosimus (ii.31.3), a 500-man Taifal cavalry regiment engaged the Romans in a "running fight", and there is no evidence that this campaign was a failure.[10][11] Nonetheless, the Taifals largely fell into the hands of the Romans at this time.

Around 336 they revolted against Constantine and were put down by the generals Herpylion, Virius Nepotianus, and Ursus.[12] By 358 the Taifals were independent foederati of Rome and Oltenia lay outside Roman control.[13] They launched campaigns as allies of the Romans from their own Oltenic bases, against the Limigantes (358 and 359) and the Sarmatians (358).[14] However, campaigns against the Thervingi by the emperor Valens in 367 and 368 were inhibited by the independence of Oltenia.[13] It is possible, however, that the Taifals at this time were still fighting alongside the Goths.[15] In 365 the emperor ordered the construction of defensive towers in Dacia Ripensis, but whether this was Oltenia is unclear.[16] Archaeological evidence evidences no sedes Taifalorum (Taifal settlements) west of the Olt River.[4]

Crossing the Danube

With the Iazyges and the Carpi, the Taifals were harassing the Roman province of Dacia in the mid fourth century. However, the arrival of a new threat—Huns—from Central Asia changed the political layout of Dacia: "the Huns threw themselves upon the Alans, the Alans upon the Goths, and the Goths upon the Taifali and Sarmatae."[17] Athanaric had refused to extend his defensive preparations to the Taifalian territory and the Huns forced the Taifals to abandon Oltenia and western Muntenia by 370.[18][19] The Taifals allied with the Greuthungi of Farnobius against Rome; they crossed the Danube in 377, but were defeated in late autumn that year.[20] The Taifals were prominent among the survivors of Farnobius' coalition. After the Gothic victory at Adrianople (378) under Fritigern, the Thervingian king Athanaric began to assail the Taifals.[17] Athanaric had not included the Taifals in his defensive construction efforts against the Huns earlier (376).[21] The breaking of the alliance between Thervingia and Taifal may have had something to do with disagreements over tactics in light of the Huns and the crossing of the Danube, the Taifals being horsemen and the Thervingi infantry.[22]

Sometime before their conversion to Christianity, Ammianus Marcellinus wrote:

It is said that this nation of the Taifali was so profligate, and so immersed in the foulest obscenities of life, that they indulged in all kinds of unnatural lusts, exhausting the vigour both of youth and manhood in the most polluted defilements of debauchery. But if any adult caught a boar or slew a bear single-handed, he was then exempted from all compulsion of submitting to such ignominious pollution.[23]

The Taifals were probably never Arians. Their conversion to the Orthodox Catholic faith probably occurred through Roman evangelism in the mid fifth century.[24]

A page of the Insignia viri illustris magistri Equitum from manuscript Canon. Misc. 378 of Notitia Dignitatum, since 1817 in the Bodleian Library[25]

Coloni and laeti of the Empire

Subsequent to their defeat and falling out with Athanaric, the Taifals were officially resettled as coloni to farm lands in northern Italy (Modena, Parma, Reggio, Emilia) and Aquitaine by the victorious general Frigeridus.[26] Abandoned Oltenia was settled by the Huns c. 400. Some Taifals allied with the Huns as early as 378, and some were later still allied with them at the Battle of Châlons (451). However, the victory of Adrianople in 378 meant that those Taifals who remained with the Visigoths fought against their cousins at Châlons. In 412, the Taifals entered Aquitaine in the train of the Visigoths.

The Taifals were often teamed with the Sarmatians and the Citrati iuniores by the Romans and subsequently by Clovis I. According to the Notitia Dignitatum of the early fifth century, there was a unit called the Equites Taifali established by Honorius under the comes Britanniarum in Britannia.[27] Possibly this unit may have been sent to the island by Stilicho in 399, and they may have been the same unit as the Equites Honoriani seniores mentioned around the same time. Thus, the Equites Honoriani Taifali seniores served in Britain while the Equites Honoriani Taifali iuniores served in Gaul under the magister Equitum. The Taifali iuniores used the dragon-and-pearl device on their shields.[28] The Equites Taifali seniores had mirrored bears holding the shield boss, as illustrated in the Notitia Dignitatum. The Notitia also lists a unit called the Comites Taifali in the Eastern Empire, which was probably formed in the reign of Theodosius I.[29]

Presence in Merovingian Gaul

Also according to the Notitia, there was a praefectus Sarmatarum et Taifalorum gentilium, Pictavis in Galia, that is, a Sarmatian and Taifal prefect in Poitiers in Gaul.[30] The region of Poitou was even called Thifalia, Theiphalia or Theofalgicus pagus (all meaning "Taifal country") in the sixth century. The Taifals were instrumental in defeating the Visigothic cavalry hand to hand at the Battle of Vouillé in 507.[31]

Under the Merovingians, Theiphalia had its own dux (duke).[32] It is possible that the Taifal laeti who had served the Romans also served as garrisons for the Franks, but this is not referred to in primary records.[33] The laeti were formally integrated into the Merovingian military establishment under Childebert I.[34] Gregory of Tours, the principal source for the Taifals in the sixth century, says that a certain Frankish dux named Austrapius "oppressed" the Taifals (probably in the vicinity of Tiffauges); they revolted and killed him.[35] The last mention of the Taifals as a distinct gens dates from year 565,[36] but their Oltenic remnants almost certainly took part in the Lombard migration and invasion of Italy in 568.[37]

The most famous Taifal was Saint Senoch, who founded an abbey at the Roman ruins which are now called Saint-Senoch.[38] The Taifal influence extended into the ninth century and their fortresses, like Tiffauges and Lusignan, continued in use under the Carolingians.[39] It has even been suggested that the Asiatic Taifals and Sarmatians influenced the Germanic arts.[40] They also left their mark in the municipal nomenclature of the region: asides from Tiffauges, mentioned above, Taphaleschat[41] in Corrèze, Touffailles and Touffaillou in Aquitaine, and Chauffailles (formerly Taïfailia) in Burgundy owe their names to Taifal settlement. Perhaps the town of Tafalla in the Navarre owes its name to these people, but if so, it is unknown if the Taifals were established in Hispania (probably to subdue the Basques) by the Romans before 412 or by the Visigoths after that. The town of Taivola in northern Italy was also a Taifal settlement.[42]

Sources

Notes

  1. ↑ Wolfram, 45.
  2. ↑ Maenchen-Helfen, 26 n50, says there is "no evidence they were Germans". Dalton, I, 172 n7, calls them "probably of Asiatic descent." Wolfram, 92, mentions hypothesised Vandalic origin which equates the Taifals with the Lacringi and considers "Taifali" to be a Celtic "cult name".
  3. ↑ Wolfram, 56.
  4. 1 2 Wolfram, 91.
  5. ↑ Panegyrici Latini, iii[xi].17, cited in Thompson, 9 n2.
  6. 1 2 3 Wolfram, 57ff, mentions a panegyric delivered on 1 April 291 which refers to Thervings and Taiflas defeating a Vandal-Gepid coalition.
  7. ↑ Thompson, 4.
  8. ↑ Musset, 36.
  9. ↑ http://www.comunacosoveni.ro/cultura-locala/prezentare-locala
  10. 1 2 Thompson, 11 and n3.
  11. 1 2 Wolfram, 61 and n141.
  12. ↑ Barnes, "Forty", 226, and "Constans", 331–332.
  13. 1 2 Thompson, 13.
  14. ↑ Wolfram, 63.
  15. ↑ Wolfram, 67.
  16. ↑ Thompson, 14 n1.
  17. 1 2 Ambrose of Milan, Expositio evangelii secundum Lucam, X.10, quoted in Maenchen-Helfen, 20.
  18. ↑ Maenchen-Helfen, 26 and n50.
  19. ↑ Wolfram, 408 n225.
  20. ↑ Id. Ammianus wrote of their annihilation, but Zosimus placed them second to the Goths in importance. They were evidently numerous.
  21. ↑ Wolfram, 71.
  22. ↑ Wolfram, 99.
  23. ↑ Ammianus, 31.IX.v. Greenberg, 243, believes this refers to practices of ritualistic homosexual pederasty among the Taifali warrior class.
  24. ↑ Wolfram, 238.
  25. ↑ This MS was bought by the Bodleian from the estate of the Venetian Jesuit Matteo Luigi Canonici (1727–c.1806). It was originally made in 1436 for Pietro Donato, Bishop of Padua.
  26. ↑ Wolfram, 123.
  27. ↑ Wolfram, 478 n562.
  28. ↑ Nickel, 139.
  29. ↑ Nischer, 51.
  30. ↑ Bachrach, Merovingian, 12 n30.
  31. ↑ Bachrach, Merovingian, 17.
  32. ↑ Bachrach, Merovingian, 29 and 38.
  33. ↑ Dalton, I, 226, who calls them foederati.
  34. ↑ Dalton, I, 44.
  35. ↑ Gregory, IV.18.
  36. ↑ In Gregory, Wolfram, 238. Gregory's generally friendly attitude towards the Taifals attests to their orthodoxy and to their relative lack of Gothicisation considering their many years spent in Gothic alliances.
  37. ↑ Musset, 88.
  38. ↑ Gregory, V.7.
  39. ↑ Bachrach, Aquitaine, 24.
  40. ↑ Dalton, I, 172 n7.
  41. ↑ http://maps.google.fr/maps?hl=fr&num=30&q=Taphaleschat+Saint-Sulpice-les-Bois&ie=UTF8&split=0&gl=fr&ei=zoiaSv3dH5qsjAeN34m7BQ&ll=46.739861,4.350586&spn=15.511101,27.817383&t=h&z=5&iwloc=A
  42. ↑ Wolfram, 92.
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 3/24/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.