Thousandth of an inch

Thousandth of an inch
Unit conversions
1 thousandth of an inch in ...... is equal to ...
   imperial & US customary systems    0.001 in
   SI units    25.40 μm

A thousandth of an inch is a derived unit of length in an inch-based system of units. Equal to 0.001 inches, it is normally referred to as a thou /ˈθaʊ/, a thousandth, or (particularly in the United States) a mil.

The plural of thou is also thou (thus one hundredth of an inch is "10 thou"), while the plural of mil is mils (thus "10 mils"). Both words come from roots meaning "1000": "thou" from the English "thousand", which is from the Germanic root for 1000, and "mil" from the Romance root for 1000. The US Customary mil can be confused with the millimetre, which is the standard meaning for "mil" or "mils" (plural) in British English and European engineering circles. This can cause problems with spoken dimensions or with those who are not familiar with alternative uses of the term. One US mil is approximately 1/40th of a millimetre at 0.0254 mm, or 25.40 μm.

Contexts of use

The thou, or mil, is most commonly used in engineering and manufacturing. For example in specifying:

There are also compound units such as "mils per year" used to express corrosion rates.[3]

A related measurement for area known as the circular mil, is based on a circle having a diameter of one mil.

Tenths

In machining, where the thou is often treated as a basic unit, 0.0001 inches can be referred to as "one tenth", meaning "one tenth of a thou".[4] (The metric comparison is discussed below.) Machining "to within a few tenths" is often considered very accurate, and at or near the extreme limit of tolerance capability in most contexts. Greater accuracy (tolerance ranges inside one tenth) apply in only a few contexts: in plug gauge and gauge block manufacturing or calibration, they are typically expressed in millionths of an inch or, alternatively, in micrometres; in nanotechnology, nanometres or picometres are used.

Usage notes on mil versus thou

The unit is generally referred to as a thou in United States; mil was once the more common term,[5][6] although as use of the metric system has become common within U.S. industry in recent decades, thou has replaced mil among most technical users to avoid confusion with millimetres,[5][6][7] and today both terms are used, but in specific contexts one is traditionally preferred over the other. Thus "mil" tends to be used more than "thou" for the thickness of plastic sheet, while "thou" or "thousandths" tends to be used when discussing machined dimensions.

For the last several decades, the term "thou", or "thousandths" has become normal usage, thus avoiding confusion with the metric system. In the manufacturing sector, the term "mills" is used almost exclusively for millimeters; leaving "thou" for widespread US usage.

Equivalence to other units of length

Unit conversions

1 thou is exactly equal to:

Heuristics

For machinists who need to maintain a continual "horse sense" of relative size, it is useful to have a gut feeling for the following. (Each of these "equivalents" is off by an amount that is negligible for most practical purposes—for example, 2 tenths on a plus-minus-10-thou tolerance. But the point here is horse sense on the fly—quick common-sense mental math to keep oneself oriented when machining and inspecting.)

History of usage

The introduction of the thousandth of an inch as a sensible base unit in engineering and machining is generally attributed to Joseph Whitworth[8] who wrote in 1857:

...instead of our engineers and machinists thinking in eighths, sixteenths and thirty-seconds of an inch, it is desirable that they should think and speak in tenths, hundredths, and thousandths...[9]

Whitworth's main point was to advocate decimalization in place of fractions based on successive halving; but in mentioning thousandths, he was also broaching the idea of a finer division than had been used previously. Up until this era, workers such as millwrights, boilermakers, and machinists measured only in traditional fractions of an inch, divided via successive halving, usually only as far as 64ths (1,  1⁄2,  1⁄4,  1⁄8,  1⁄16,  1⁄32,  1⁄64). Each 64th is about 15 thou. Communication about sizes smaller than a 64th of an inch was subjective and hampered by a degree of ineffability—while phrases such as "scant 64th" or "heavy 64th" were used, their communicative ability was limited by subjectivity. Dimensions and geometry could be controlled to high accuracy, but this was done by comparative methods: comparison against templates or other gauges, feeling the degree of drag of calipers, or simply repeatably cutting, relying on the positioning consistency of jigs, fixtures, and machine slides. Such work could only be done in craft fashion: on-site, by feel, rather than at a distance working from drawings and written notes. Although measurement was certainly a part of the daily routine, the highest-precision aspects of the work were achieved by feel or by gauge, not by measuring (as in determining counts of units). This in turn limited the kinds of process designs that could work, because they limited the degree of separation of concerns that could occur.

The introduction of thou as a base unit for machining work required the dissemination of vernier calipers and screw micrometers throughout the trade, as the unit is too small to be measured with practical repeatability using rules alone. (Most rule markings were far too wide to mark a single mil, and even if such dividing is accomplished, it is illegible to the naked eye, being discernible but not useful for measuring.) During the following half century, such measuring instruments went from expensive rarities to widespread, everyday use among machinists. Bringing more metrology into machining increased the separation of concerns to make possible, for example, designing an assembly to the point of an engineering drawing, then having the mating parts made at different firms who did not have any contact with (or even awareness of) each other—yet still knowing with certainty that their products would have the desired fit.

See also

References

  1. ↑ "Paper weight comparison and more". paper-paper.com. Micro Format. Retrieved 2016-01-18.
  2. ↑ "The Gerber Format Specification" (PDF). Ucamco. July 2014. p. 30. Retrieved 2014-08-27.
  3. ↑ "Corrosion Rate Conversion", Corrosionist.com
  4. ↑ "...the smallest move of one-tenth (not 0.1 but 0.0001 of an inch)...", Dan Nelson, The CNC Toolbox, p89
  5. 1 2 Mil at How Many? A Dictionary of Units of Measurement by Russ Rowlett
  6. 1 2 University of Queensland: PCB design FAQ
  7. ↑ Thou at How Many? A Dictionary of Units of Measurement by Russ Rowlett
  8. ↑ Edkins, Jo. "Small units". Imperial Measures of Length. Jo Edkins. Retrieved 2009-09-23.
  9. ↑ "A Paper on Standard Decimal Measures of Length", Manchester, 1857
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 11/7/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.