Weeding (library)
Weeding is the systematic removal of resources from a library based on selected criteria. It is the opposite of selecting material, though the selection and de-selection of material often involve the same thought process. Weeding is a vital process for an active collection because it ensures the collection stays current, relevant, and in good condition. Weeding should be done on a continuous, on-going basis.[1]
Reasons to weed
A "well-maintained, well-pruned collection is far more useful than one filled with out-of-date or unused materials."[2] Weeding a physical collection has many benefits:[1]
- Space is preserved to add relevant materials.
- Patrons are able to access useful material quickly, and the librarian can direct them to information more easily.
- The collection is more reputable because it is current.
- The librarian can easily see the strengths and weaknesses of the collection.
- Materials are of good quality and physical condition.
With many collections having a digital component, space is not an issue for concern. However, this does not mean digital collections should not be weeded. "Clearing out unused materials makes a patron’s searching experience better by reducing the number of old and irrelevant records the patrons must wade through in their search results to find what they really want."[2] The digital collection, like the physical collection, should be kept current and easily accessible.
Weeding criteria
Weeding should be addressed in a library's Collection Development Policy, and the criteria should be outlined. The following list outlines some considerations for weeding resources.[1]
- Poor Content
- Content is outdated or obsolete
- Content is biased, racist, or sexist
- Content is irrelevant to patron needs (or not being used in a school's curriculum)
- Content is too mature/immature for patrons (especially important for school libraries)
- Poor Condition
- Resource has irreparable damage (torn pages, broken spines)
- Resource is dirty or smelly
- Resource would not survive further circulation
- Poor Circulation
- Resource is not being used by patrons in a certain timeframe
- Other Considerations
- Multiple copies that are not needed
- Enough other resources on a particular subject
- Should the item be replaced and the cost of replacement
- Visual appeal of item (including artwork)
Weeding Issues
Weeding may be viewed as controversial by community members. John N. Berry III has discussed these is his essay, "The Weeding War."[3]
References
- 1 2 3 Larson, Jeanette (2008), CREW: A Weeding Manual for Modern Libraries, Revised and Updated (PDF), Austin, TX: Texas State Library and Archives Commission, retrieved October 7, 2014
- 1 2 Lehman, Kathleen, "Collection Development and Management", Library Resources & Technical Services, 58 (3): 169–177
- ↑ Berry III, J. . (2013). "The Weeding War." Library Journal, 138(18), 10.