California Proposition 76 (2005)

Presidential elections
1852 1856 1860 1864 1868 1872 1876 1880 1884 1888 1892 1896 1900 1904 1908 1912 1916 1920 1924 1928 1932 1936 1940 1944 1948 1952 1956 1960 1964 1968 1972 1976 1980 1984 1988 1992 1996 2000 2004 2008 2012 2016
Primary elections
Democratic 2000 2004 2008 Republican 2000 2004 2008 2012
United States Senate elections
1950 1980 1982 1986 1988 1992 1992 (special) 1994 1998 2000 2004 2006 2010 2012 2016
Congressional elections
At-Large (1849-1863) 1864 1866 1868 1870 1872 1874 1876 1878 1880 1882 1884 1886 1888 1890 1892 1894 1896 1898 1900 1902 1904 1906 1908 1910 1912 1914 1916 1918 1920 1922 1924 1926 1928 1930 1932 1934 1936 1938 1940 1942 1944 1946 12^th (1946) 1948 1950 1952 1954 1956 1958 1960 1962 1964 1966 1968 1970 1972 1974 1976 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 11^th (2006) 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016
Special elections to the House
5^th (2005) 48^th (2005) 36^th (2007) 12^th (2008) 10^th (2009) 32^nd (2009) 36^th (2011)

Gubernatorial elections
1849 1851 1853 1855 1857 1859 1861 1863 1867 1871 1875 1879 1882 1886 1890 1894 1898 1902 1906 1910 1914 1918 1922 1926 1930 1934 1938 1942 1946 1950 1954 1958 1962 1966 1970 1974 1978 1982 1986 1990 1994 1998 2002 2003 (recall) 2006 2010 2014 2018
Lieutenant gubernatorial elections
1994 1998 2002 2006 2010 2014
Attorney General elections
1994 1998 2002 2006 2010 2014
Secretary of State elections
1994 1998 2002 2006 2010 2014
Treasurer elections
1994 1998 2002 2006 2010 2014
Controller elections
1994 1998 2002 2006 2010 2014
Insurance Commissioner elections
1994 1998 2002 2006 2010 2014
Superintendent of Public Instruction elections
1994 1998 2002 2006 2010 2014

Court of Appeals elections
1994 1998 2002 2006

Elections by year

State elections
Nov 1992 Nov 1994 Nov 1996 Nov 1998 Nov 2000 Nov 2002 Nov 2004 Nov 2005 Nov 2006 Feb 2008 Jun 2008 Nov 2008 May 2009 Jun 2010 Nov 2010 Jun 2012 Nov 2012 2014 Jun 2016

Mayoral elections
1896 1898 1900 1902 1904 1906 1909 (M) 1909 (N) 1911 1913 1915 1917 1919 1921 1923 1925 1929 1933 1937 1938 1941 1945 1949 1953 1957 1961 1965 1969 1973 1977 1981 1985 1989 1993 1997 2001 2005 2009 2013
General elections
2009 2011 2013
City Attorney elections
2009
Board of Supervisors elections
2006 2008 2010 2012

Mayoral elections
1975 1979 1983 1987 1991 1995 1999 2003 2007 2011 2015
Board of Supervisors elections
1977 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012
General elections
Mar 2004 Nov 2004 Nov 2005 Jun 2006 Nov 2006 Nov 2007 Feb 2008 Jun 2008 Nov 2008 Nov 2009 Jun 2010 Nov 2010 Nov 2011 Jun 2012 Nov 2012 Nov 2013

Mayoral elections
2014

Proposition 76 was a ballot proposition in the state of California in the referendum election. It involves school funding, state spending, and is an initiative constitutional amendment.

Official summary (From the Attorney General)

Limits state spending to prior year’s level plus three previous years’ average revenue growth.
Changes state minimum school funding requirements (Proposition 98); eliminates repayment requirement when minimum funding suspended.
Excludes appropriations above the minimum from schools’ funding base.
Directs excess General Fund revenues, currently directed to schools/tax relief, to budget reserve, specified construction, debt repayment.
Permits Governor, under specified circumstances, to reduce appropriations of Governor’s choosing, including employee compensation/state contracts.
Continues prior year appropriations if state budget delayed.
Prohibits state special funds borrowing.
Requires payment of local government mandates.

Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local governments:

The provisions creating an additional state spending limit and granting the Governor new power to reduce spending in most program areas would likely reduce expenditures relative to current law. These reductions also could apply to schools and shift costs to other local governments.
The new spending limit could result in a smoother pattern of state expenditures over time, especially to the extent that reserves are set aside in good times and available in bad times.
The provisions changing school funding formulas would make school and community college funding more subject to annual decisions of state policymakers and less affected by a constitutional funding guarantee.
Relative to current law, the measure could result in a change in the mix of state spending—that is, some programs could receive a larger share and others a smaller share of the total budget.

The proposition was defeated with a 24.6% margin or about 1 876 383 voters rejecting it.

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 11/10/2012. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.