United States Senate election in California, 2010
 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| County results | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Elections in California | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
The 2010 United States Senate election in California took place on November 2, 2010. The election was held alongside 33 other United States Senate elections in addition to congressional, state, and various local elections. Incumbent Democratic U.S. Senator Barbara Boxer won re-election to a fourth term.
Democratic primary
Candidates
- Barbara Boxer, incumbent United States Senator
- Mickey Kaus, Journalist/Blogger
- Brian Quintana, Businessman/Educator
Controversies
Boxer
In 2009, Boxer was criticized for correcting a general who called her "ma'am". Brigadier General Michael Walsh was testifying on the Louisiana coastal restoration process in the wake of Hurricane Katrina and answered Boxer's query with "ma'am" when Boxer interrupted him. "Do me a favor," Boxer said. "can you say 'senator' instead of 'ma'am?'" "Yes, ma'am," Walsh interjected. "It's just a thing, I worked so hard to get that title, so I'd appreciate it. Thank you," she said. The Army's guide to protocol instructs service members to call members of the U.S. Senate "sir", "ma'am" or "senator".[1][2][3] Fiorina used this incident prominently in campaign ads, as did David Zucker, who directed a humorous commercial for RightChange.com titled 'Call Me Senator'.
Results
| Candidate | Votes | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Barbara Boxer (Incumbent) | 1,957,920 | 81.0% | |
| Brian Quintana | 338,442 | 13.9% | |
| Mickey Kaus | 123,573 | 5.1% | |
| Total votes | 2,419,935 | 100% | |
Republican primary
Candidates
- Tom Campbell, economist and former U.S. Representative
- Carly Fiorina former Chief Executive Officer of Hewlett-Packard
- Chuck DeVore, State Assemblyman
- Tim Kalemkarian
- Al Ramirez, businessman
Controversies
Fiorina
In February 2010, Carly Fiorina put out a campaign ad attacking Republican rival Tom Campbell featuring a "demon sheep", creating international, mostly negative, publicity.[4][5]
The Los Angeles Times research of public records indicated Fiorina had failed to vote in most elections. Fiorina responded by saying, "I'm a lifelong registered Republican but I haven't always voted, and I will provide no excuse for it. You know, people die for the right to vote. And there are many, many Californians and Americans who exercise that civic duty on a regular basis. I didn't. Shame on me."[6][7]
Campbell
Former State Senator and California Secretary of State Bruce McPherson alleged that during a telephone call with Carly Fiorina's campaign manager, Marty Wilson, Wilson expressed surprise that McPherson was endorsing the candidacy of Tom Campbell, and called him an anti-Semite.[8] Subsequently, Wilson strongly denied having made that charge against Campbell, thus leading to a controversy for the Fiorina campaign, where the credibility of long-time Sacramento political operative Marty Wilson was called into a comparison with that of Bruce McPherson.
On March 5, the three principal Republican primary candidates, Campbell, DeVore, and Fiorina participated in a live, on-air debate, which was broadcast on KTKZ in Sacramento. The debate was called by Campbell, in order to respond to accusations of "anti-Semitism," and otherwise being unfriendly to the interests of Israel.[9]
Campbell had also been criticized for having accepted campaign contributions (during his 2000 Senate race), from then-University of South Florida professor Sami Al-Arian.[10] On March 2, 2006, Al-Arian entered a guilty plea to a charge of conspiracy to help the Islamic Jihad Movement in Palestine, a "specially designated terrorist" organization; he was sentenced to 57 months in prison, and ordered deported following his prison term.[11][12] The usually subdued Tom Campbell responded very strongly to the accusations coming out of the Fiorina campaign, saying, "I called for this debate today so that both of my opponents can bring up absolutely any charge they want. Air it, and let me respond to it. But there’s no place for calling me anti-Semitic, then denying it. That whispering campaign, that 'silent slander,' stops today."[13]
A dispute had been triggered as well by Campbell's 2002 letter in defense of Al-Arian. Campbell said he had not been aware of the charges against Al-Arian when he wrote his January 21, 2002, letter to USF's president, asking USF not to discipline Al-Arian.[14][15][16]
He also said he had not been aware that Al-Arian had said, in a speech discussed in an O'Reilly interview before Campbell wrote his letter: "Jihad is our path. Victory to Islam. Death to Israel."[17] Campbell said:
I did not hear, I did not read, I was not aware of statements Sami Al-Arian had made relative to Israel. And I would not have written the letter had I known about those. ... To say 'Death to Israel' is abhorrent, it's horrible.[17]
Campbell said he was sorry he wrote the letter, adding that he did not know about the statements at the time. He said he should have researched that matter more thoroughly, and he would have known.[14][17][18][19]
Campbell had initially maintained that Al-Arian had never contributed to Campbell's 2000 Senate campaign.[20] That turned out to be untrue.[20] Campbell also initially said his letter defending Al-Arian was sent before the O'Reilly 2001 television broadcast where Al-Arian admitted saying "death to Israel," but that also turned out to be incorrect.[20] Campbell said his misstatements were the result of the events having taken place years prior.[20]
Polling
| Poll source | Date(s) administered |
Sample size |
Margin of Error |
Tom Campbell | Carly Fiorina | Chuck DeVore | Other | Unde- cided |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Survey USA (report) | June 3–6, 2010 | 569 | ±4.2% | 22% | 48% | 16% | 9% | |
| Los Angeles Times (report) | May 19–26, 2010 | 1,506 | ±2.6% | 23% | 38% | 16% | 23% | |
| Survey USA (report) | May 21–23, 2010 | 612 | ±4.3% | 23% | 46% | 14% | 6% | 11% |
| Public Policy Polling (report) | May 21–23, 2010 | 417 | ±4.8% | 21% | 41% | 16% | — | 18% |
| PPIC (report) | May 9–16, 2010 | 1,168 | ±3.0% | 23% | 25% | 16% | — | 36% |
| Research 2000 (report) | May 17–19, 2010 | 400 | ±5.0% | 37% | 22% | 14% | — | 27% |
| Survey USA (report) | May 6–9, 2010 | 548 | ±4.3% | 35% | 24% | 15% | 3% | 23% |
| Survey USA (report) | April 19–21, 2010 | 538 | ±4.3% | 34% | 27% | 14% | 3% | 23% |
| Los Angeles Times (report) | March 23–30, 2010 | 1,515 | ±2.6% | 29% | 25% | 9% | 4% | 33% |
| PPIC (report) | March 24, 2010 | 2,002 | ±2.0% | 23% | 24% | 8% | 1% | 44% |
| Research 2000 (report) | March 10, 2010 | 400 | ±5.0% | 33% | 24% | 7% | — | 36% |
| M4 Strategies (report) | February 26, 2010 | 427 | — | 32% | 19% | 11% | — | 39% |
| PPIC (report) | January 27, 2010 | 2,001 | ±2.0% | 27% | 16% | 8% | 1% | 48% |
| The Field Poll (report) | January 5–17, 2010 | 202 | ±7.1% | 30% | 25% | 6% | — | 39% |
| Los Angeles Times (report) | Oct. 27–November 3, 2009 | 499 | — | — | 27% | 27% | 2% | 40% |
| The Field Poll (report) | Sept. 18–October 6, 2009 | 373 | ±4.5% | — | 21% | 20% | — | 59% |
| The Field Poll (report) | Feb. 20–March 1, 2009 | 298 | ±3.6% | — | 31% | 19% | — | 36% |
Results
| Candidate | Votes | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Carly Fiorina | 1,315,429 | 56.4% | |
| Tom Campbell | 504,289 | 21.7% | |
| Chuck DeVore | 452,577 | 19.3% | |
| Al Ramirez | 42,149 | 1.8% | |
| Tim Kalemkarian | 19,598 | 0.8% | |
| Total votes | 2,334,042 | 100% | |
Third party primaries
Candidates
- American Independent
- Don Grundmann, chiropractor and candidate for U.S. Senate in 2006
- Edward Noonan, small business owner
- Al Salehi, political analyst
- Green
- Duane Roberts, community volunteer
- Libertarian
- Gail Lightfoot, retired nurse
- Peace and Freedom
- Marsha Feinland, retired teacher and former Peace and Freedom presidential candidate
Results
| Candidate | Votes | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Edward Noonan | 16,704 | 39.5% | |
| Don Grundmann | 14,170 | 33.5% | |
| Al Salehi | 11,423 | 27.0% | |
| Total votes | 42,297 | 100% | |
| Party | Candidate | Votes | % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Green | Duane Roberts | 19,983 | 100.00 | |
| Libertarian | Gail Lightfoot | 17,791 | 100.00 | |
| Peace and Freedom | Marsha Feinland | 4,070 | 100.00 | |
General election
Candidates
The following were certified by the California Secretary of State as candidates in the primary election for senator.[21]
- Carly Fiorina (Republican), former Chief Executive Officer of Hewlett Packard.
- Edward C. Noonan (American Independent Party), small business owner
- Barbara Boxer (Democratic), incumbent U.S. Senator
- Duane Roberts (Green), community volunteer
- Gail Lightfoot (Libertarian), retired nurse
- Marsha Feinland (Peace and Freedom), retired teacher and former Peace and Freedom presidential candidate
Campaign
Boxer criticized Fiorina's choice "to become a CEO, lay off 30,000 workers, ship jobs overseas [and] have two yachts." A spokesman for Fiorina responded that the Fiorinas were a two-yacht family because they spent time in both California and Washington, D.C.[22] Boxer also claimed that Fiorina "skirted the law" by selling equipment to Iran during her tenure as HP's CEO, also claiming that the equipment may have ended up in the hands of the Iranian military.[23]
Debates
The only debate took place on September 1 at Saint Mary's College of California in Moraga. It was sponsored by San Francisco Chronicle, KTVU, and KQED.[24]
Predictions
Polling
| Poll source | Date(s) administered |
Sample size |
Margin of error |
Barbara Boxer (D) | Carly Fiorina (R) | Other | Undecided |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Public Policy Polling (report) | October 29–31, 2010 | 882 | ± 3.3% | 50% | 46% | — | 3% |
| SurveyUSA (report) | October 26–31, 2010 | 587 | ± 4.1% | 46% | 38% | 6% | 10% |
| Angus Reid Public Opinion (report) | October 28–29, 2010 | 485 | ± 4.5% | 51% | 44% | 5% | — |
| Rasmussen Reports (report) | October 27, 2010 | 750 | ± 4.0% | 49% | 46% | 2% | 3% |
| CNN/Time/Opinion Research (report) | October 20–26, 2010 | 1,527 | ± 2.5% | 50% | 45% | 1% | — |
| Field Poll (report) | October 14–26, 2010 | 1,501 | ± 3.2% | 49% | 41% | — | 10% |
| SurveyUSA (report) | October 21–25, 2010 | 594 | ± 4.1% | 45% | 40% | 7% | 8% |
| Suffolk University (report) | October 21–24, 2010 | 600 | ± 4.0% | 52% | 43% | 4% | 2% |
| Fox/Pulse Opinion Research (report) | October 23, 2010 | 1,000 | ± 3.0% | 48% | 44% | 5% | 3% |
| Public Policy Polling (report) | October 21–23, 2010 | 622 | ± 3.2% | 52% | 43% | 0% | 5% |
| Rasmussen Reports (report) | October 21, 2010 | 750 | ± 4.0% | 48% | 46% | 3% | 3% |
| USC/LA Times (report) | October 13–20, 2010 | 878 | ± 3.2% | 50% | 42% | 4% | 4% |
| Tarrance Group (report) | October 17–19, 2010 | — | ± 4.1% | 44% | 44% | 6% | 5% |
| PPIC (report) | October 10–17, 2010 | 1,067 | ± 3.5% | 43% | 38% | 6% | 13% |
| Reuters (report) | October 12–14, 2010 | 601 | ± 4.0% | 46% | 45% | 2% | 6% |
| Rasmussen Reports (report) | October 13, 2010 | 750 | ± 4.0% | 49% | 46% | 2% | 3% |
| Angus Reid Public Opinion (report) | October 6, 2010 | 501 | ± 4.5% | 55% | 39% | 6% | — |
| Rasmussen Reports (report) | October 3, 2010 | 750 | ± 4.0% | 49% | 45% | 2% | 5% |
| USC poll report | September 27, 2010 | 1,003 | — | 39% | 34% | — | 23% |
| PPIC report | September 19–26, 2010 | 1,104 | ± 3% | 42% | 35% | 6% | 17% |
| CNN/Time/Opinion Research Corporation (report) | September 24–28, 2010 | 786 | ± 3.5% | 52% | 43% | 3% | 2% |
| Survey USA (report) | September 19–21, 2010 | 610 | ± 4.0% | 49% | 43% | 6% | 2% |
| Rasmussen Reports (report) | September 20, 2010 | 750 | ± 4.0% | 47% | 43% | 4% | 6% |
| Fox News/Pulse Opinion Research (report) | September 18, 2010 | 1,000 | ± 3.0% | 47% | 46% | 3% | 4% |
| Public Policy Polling (report) | September 14–16, 2010 | 630 | ± 3.9% | 50% | 42% | — | 8% |
| Fox News (report) | September 11, 2010 | 1,000 | ± 3.0% | 46% | 44% | 4% | 6% |
| Rasmussen Reports (report) | September 6, 2010 | 750 | ± 4.0% | 47% | 48% | 2% | 3% |
| Rasmussen Reports (report) | September 6, 2010 | 750 | ± 4.0% | 42% | 47% | — | — |
| CNN(report) | September 2–7, 2010 | 866 | ± 3.5% | 48% | 44% | 5% | 3% |
| Survey USA (report) | August 31-September 1, 2010 | 569 | ± 4.2% | 46% | 48% | 5% | 1% |
| Rasmussen Reports (report) | August 24, 2010 | 750 | ± 4.0% | 44% | 43% | 5% | 8% |
| Survey USA/CBS 5 (report) | August 9–11, 2010 | 602 | ± 4.0% | 42% | 47% | — | 11% |
| Rasmussen Reports (report) | August 3, 2010 | 750 | ± 4.0% | 45% | 40% | 5% | 10% |
| Public Policy Polling (report) | July 23–25, 2010 | 614 | ± 3.95% | 49% | 40% | — | 11% |
| Rasmussen Reports (report) | July 12, 2010 | 500 | ± 4.5% | 49% | 42% | 4% | 5% |
| Survey USA (report) | July 8–11, 2010 | 614 | ± 4.0% | 45% | 47% | 3% | 5% |
| Reuters (report) | June 30, 2010 | 600 | ± 4.5% | 45% | 41% | 1% | 13% |
| Rasmussen Reports (report) | June 9, 2010 | 500 | ± 4.5% | 48% | 43% | 5% | 5% |
| Public Policy Polling (report) | May 21–23, 2010 | 921 | ± 3.2% | 45% | 42% | — | 13% |
| Los Angeles Times (report) | May 19–26, 2010 | — | — | 44% | 38% | — | — |
| Research 2000 (report) | May 17–19, 2010 | 600 | ± 4.0% | 48% | 39% | — | — |
| PPIC (report) | May 9–16, 2010 | 2,003 | ± 2.0% | 48% | 39% | — | 13% |
| Rasmussen Reports (report) | May 12, 2010 | 500 | ± 4.5% | 45% | 38% | 4% | 12% |
| Rasmussen Reports (report) | April 12, 2010 | 500 | ± 4.5% | 42% | 38% | 7% | 13% |
| PPIC (report) | March 24, 2010 | 2,002 | ± 2.0% | 44% | 43% | — | 13% |
| The Field Poll (report) | March 18, 2010 | 748 | ± 3.7% | 45% | 44% | — | 11% |
| Rasmussen Reports (report) | March 11, 2010 | 500 | ± 4.5% | 46% | 40% | 4% | 10% |
| Research 2000 (report) | March 10, 2010 | 600 | ± 4.0% | 49% | 40% | — | 11% |
| Rasmussen Reports (report) | February 11, 2010 | 500 | ± 4.5% | 46% | 42% | 7% | 5% |
| PPIC (report) | January 27, 2010 | 2,001 | ± 2.0% | 48% | 40% | — | 12% |
| The Field Poll (report) | January 5–17, 2010 | 1,005 | ± 3.2% | 50% | 35% | — | 15% |
| Rasmussen Reports (report) | January 14, 2010 | 500 | ± 4.5% | 46% | 43% | 3% | 8% |
| Rasmussen Reports (report) | November 17, 2009 | 500 | ± 4.5% | 46% | 37% | 5% | 12% |
| The Field Poll (report) | Sept. 18–October 6, 2009 | 1,005 | ± 3.2% | 49% | 35% | — | 16% |
| Rasmussen Reports (report) | September 23, 2009 | 500 | ± 4.5% | 49% | 39% | 4% | 8% |
| Research 2000 (report) | August 9–12, 2009 | 600 | ± 4.0% | 52% | 31% | — | 17% |
| Rasmussen Reports (report) | July 22, 2009 | 500 | ± 4.5% | 45% | 41% | 7% | 7% |
| Rasmussen Reports (report) | March 9, 2009 | 500 | ± 4.5% | 47% | 38% | 10% | 5% |
| The Field Poll (report) | Feb. 20–March 1, 2009 | 761 | ± 3.6% | 55% | 25% | — | 20% |
| Poll source | Dates administered | Barbara Boxer | Chuck DeVore |
|---|---|---|---|
| USC/Los Angeles Times (Report) | May 19–26, 2010 | 46% | 36% |
| Public Policy Polling | May 21–23, 2010 | 46% | 40% |
| Research 2000 | May 17–19, 2010 | 47% | 38% |
| Public Policy Institute of California (Report) | May, 2010 | 50% | 39% |
| Rasmussen Reports | May 12, 2010 | 46% | 40% |
| Rasmussen Reports | April 12, 2010 | 42% | 39% |
| PPIC | March 24, 2010 | 46% | 40% |
| Field Research | March 18, 2010 | 45% | 41% |
| Rasmussen Reports | March 11, 2010 | 46% | 40% |
| Research 2000 | March 10, 2010 | 49% | 39% |
| Rasmussen Reports | February 11, 2010 | 47% | 42% |
| PPIC | January 27, 2010 | 47% | 39% |
| The Field Poll | January 5–17, 2010 | 51% | 34% |
| Rasmussen Reports | January 14, 2010 | 46% | 40% |
| Rasmussen Reports | November 17, 2009 | 46% | 36% |
| The Field Poll | September 18–Oct. 6, 2009 | 50% | 33% |
| Rasmussen Reports | September 23, 2009 | 46% | 37% |
| Research 2000 | August 9–12, 2009 | 53% | 29% |
| Poll source | Dates administered | Barbara Boxer | Tom Campbell |
|---|---|---|---|
| USC/Los Angeles Times (Report) | May 19–26, 2010 | 38% | 45% |
| Public Policy Polling | May 21–23, 2010 | 47% | 40% |
| Research 2000 | May 17–19, 2010 | 47% | 40% |
| Public Policy Institute of California (Report) | May, 2010 | 46% | 40% |
| Rasmussen Reports | May 12, 2010 | 42% | 41% |
| Rasmussen Reports | April 12, 2010 | 42% | 41% |
| PPIC | March 24, 2010 | 43% | 44% |
| Field Research | March 18, 2010 | 43% | 44% |
| Rasmussen Reports | March 11, 2010 | 43% | 41% |
| Research 2000 | March 10, 2010 | 47% | 43% |
| Rasmussen Reports | February 11, 2010 | 45% | 41% |
| PPIC | January 27, 2010 | 45% | 41% |
| The Field Poll | January 5–17, 2010 | 48% | 38% |
| Rasmussen Reports | January 14, 2010 | 46% | 42% |
Fundraising
| Candidate (party) | Receipts | Disbursements | Cash on hand | Debt |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boxer, BarbaraBarbara Boxer (D) | $20,314,189 | $22,178,746 | $2,271,034 | $0 |
| Fiorina, CarlyCarly Fiorina (R) | $17,935,605 | $16,664,055 | $1,271,550 | $805,844 |
| Carroll, JerryJerry Carroll (I) | $140 | $140 | $10 | $1,305 |
| Feinland, MarshaMarsha Feinland (P&F) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Goldberg, NeilNeil Goldberg (I) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Lightfoot, GailGail Lightfoot (L) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Noonan, EdwardEdward Noonan (AI) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Roberts, DuaneDuane Roberts (G) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $12,562 |
| Source: Federal Election Commission (FEC)[25] (Note that some candidates filed with the FEC, but did not pursue their candidacy.) | ||||
Results
Despite the last poll before the election showed Fiorina only trailing by 4 points, on election night Boxer defeated Fiorina by a Ten point margin, and around a one million vote majority. Boxer's victory was notable, because although the 2010 Midterms was a good year for Republicans, and despite close polls, Boxer still won in a landslide. Boxer as expected performed extremely well in Los Angeles County, and the San Francisco Bay Area. Boxer was declared the winner shortly after the polls closed. Fiorina conceded defeat to Boxer at 11:38 P.M.
| Party | Candidate | Votes | % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | Barbara Boxer (Incumbent) | 5,218,441 | 52.2 | |
| Republican | Carly Fiorina | 4,217,366 | 42.2 | |
| Libertarian | Gail Lightfoot | 175,242 | 1.8 | |
| Peace and Freedom | Marsha Feinland | 135,093 | 1.4 | |
| Green | Duane Roberts | 128,510 | 1.2 | |
| American Independent | Edward Noonan | 125,441 | 1.2 | |
| N/A | James E. Harris (Write-in) | 41 | 0.0 | |
| N/A | Connor Vlakancic (Write-in) | 11 | 0.0 | |
| N/A | Jerry Leon Carroll (Write-in) | 10 | 0.0 | |
| N/A | Hans J. Kugler (Write-in) | 5 | 0.0 | |
| Invalid or blank votes | ||||
| Total votes | 10,000,160 | 100 | ||
| Voter turnout | % | |||
Results by county
Results from the Secretary of State of California.[27]
| County | Boxer | Votes | Fiorina | Votes | Votes | Votes | Votes | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| San Francisco | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | ||||||
| Alameda | 68.98% | 232,180 | 20.96% | 70,550 | 6.85% | 23,072 | 1.83% | 6,161 | 1.38% | 4,639 |
| Marin | 63.27% | 55,164 | 26.40% | 23,015 | 7.34% | 6,403 | 1.55% | 1,350 | 1.44% | 1,257 |
| San Mateo | 62.35% | 104,457 | 28.39% | 47,553 | 4.89% | 8,191 | 2.72% | 4,553 | 1.65% | 2,766 |
| Los Angeles | 59.67% | 978,010 | 32.21% | 527,970 | 3.60% | 59,008 | 2.72% | 44,611 | 1.80% | 29,450 |
| Santa Clara | 58.74% | 203,254 | 32.45% | 112,292 | 4.15% | 14,345 | 2.62% | 9,065 | 2.05% | 7,081 |
| Santa Cruz | 58.60% | 44,484 | 25.97% | 19,712 | 10.36% | 7,863 | 2.37% | 1,797 | 2.71% | 2,060 |
| Contra Costa | 57.34% | 144,312 | 34.64% | 87,169 | 3.89% | 9,789 | 2.58% | 6,486 | 1.56% | 3,915 |
| Sonoma | 56.59% | 80,404 | 29.71% | 42,216 | 8.73% | 12,406 | 2.91% | 4,141 | 2.06% | 2,925 |
| Monterey | 56.47% | 48,391 | 35.02% | 30,009 | 3.59% | 3,077 | 2.77% | 2,377 | 2.15% | 1,840 |
| Solano | 55.46% | 48,085 | 37.00% | 32,080 | 3.09% | 2,683 | 2.93% | 2,543 | 1.51% | 1,308 |
| Imperial | 55.28% | 11,916 | 37.23% | 8,024 | 2.45% | 528 | 3.63% | 783 | 1.41% | 304 |
| Napa | 54.28% | 19,688 | 36.33% | 13,175 | 4.83% | 1,751 | 2.65% | 962 | 1.91% | 693 |
| Yolo | 54.06% | 24,841 | 35.49% | 16,307 | 6.51% | 2,993 | 2.25% | 1,032 | 1.68% | 774 |
| San Benito | 53.17% | 6,500 | 39.47% | 4,826 | 2.68% | 328 | 2.91% | 356 | 1.77% | 216 |
| Lake | 51.97% | 8,236 | 38.60% | 6,117 | 4.67% | 740 | 2.78% | 440 | 1.99% | 315 |
| Mendocino | 50.66% | 12,323 | 30.69% | 7,465 | 12.48% | 3,036 | 2.72% | 661 | 3.45% | 838 |
| Sacramento | 49.55% | 154,010 | 42.31% | 131,519 | 3.73% | 11,607 | 2.97% | 9,230 | 1.44% | 4,474 |
| Merced | 49.14% | 19,577 | 44.32% | 17,657 | 2.12% | 845 | 3.01% | 1,201 | 1.40% | 556 |
| Humboldt | 48.22% | 20,219 | 34.86% | 14,616 | 12.36% | 5,184 | 1.99% | 836 | 2.57% | 1,076 |
| San Joaquin | 48.12% | 57,712 | 44.94% | 53,902 | 2.63% | 3,152 | 2.86% | 3,426 | 1.45% | 1,739 |
| Stanislaus | 47.56% | 45,227 | 45.88% | 43,632 | 2.47% | 2,353 | 2.85% | 2,709 | 1.24% | 1,180 |
| Alpine | 46.81% | 257 | 37.70% | 207 | 7.10% | 39 | 5.83% | 32 | 2.55% | 14 |
| Santa Barbara | 46.47% | 51,671 | 44.31% | 49,272 | 5.32% | 5,918 | 2.25% | 2,499 | 1.66% | 1,842 |
| Ventura | 45.25% | 84,750 | 46.72% | 87,496 | 3.29% | 6,165 | 2.78% | 5,203 | 1.95% | 3,661 |
| Del Norte | 44.80% | 2,980 | 45.04% | 2,996 | 3.52% | 234 | 3.92% | 261 | 2.72% | 181 |
| San Bernardino | 44.40% | 120,704 | 48.27% | 131,235 | 2.32% | 6,302 | 3.30% | 8,980 | 1.71% | 4,652 |
| San Diego | 44.30% | 278,746 | 47.99% | 301,980 | 2.95% | 18,536 | 2.84% | 17,901 | 1.92% | 12,056 |
| Kings | 43.88% | 9,184 | 51.14% | 10,703 | 1.29% | 270 | 2.74% | 573 | 0.96% | 200 |
| Fresno | 43.80% | 66,829 | 50.02% | 76,307 | 2.16% | 3,298 | 2.73% | 4,169 | 1.28% | 1,959 |
| Riverside | 43.37% | 129,958 | 50.35% | 150,867 | 2.01% | 6,013 | 2.85% | 8,538 | 1.42% | 4,252 |
| Amador | 42.70% | 5,499 | 49.80% | 6,413 | 2.98% | 384 | 2.98% | 384 | 1.53% | 197 |
| Tuolumne | 42.38% | 7,545 | 49.58% | 8,827 | 3.56% | 633 | 2.99% | 532 | 1.49% | 265 |
| Trinity | 41.43% | 1,988 | 45.24% | 2,171 | 5.58% | 268 | 4.04% | 194 | 3.71% | 178 |
| San Luis Obispo | 40.46% | 32,382 | 50.17% | 40,153 | 4.84% | 3,875 | 2.51% | 2,010 | 2.02% | 1,616 |
| Mono | 39.54% | 1,155 | 49.81% | 1,455 | 5.27% | 154 | 2.77% | 81 | 2.60% | 76 |
| Calaveras | 39.41% | 5,913 | 50.42% | 7,564 | 4.58% | 687 | 3.37% | 505 | 2.23% | 334 |
| Tulare | 37.81% | 23,457 | 56.62% | 35,121 | 1.67% | 1,033 | 2.72% | 1,687 | 1.18% | 735 |
| Nevada | 37.80% | 14,613 | 50.87% | 19,665 | 6.90% | 2,669 | 2.51% | 969 | 1.92% | 744 |
| Tehama | 37.62% | 5,749 | 53.84% | 8,228 | 2.76% | 422 | 3.28% | 502 | 2.50% | 382 |
| Butte | 37.32% | 22,400 | 51.38% | 30,842 | 6.54% | 3,926 | 2.89% | 1,734 | 1.87% | 1,121 |
| Mariposa | 37.27% | 2,367 | 53.14% | 3,375 | 4.02% | 255 | 3.90% | 248 | 1.67% | 106 |
| Plumas | 37.20% | 2,880 | 53.36% | 4,131 | 3.77% | 292 | 3.62% | 280 | 2.05% | 159 |
| Madera | 36.99% | 9,624 | 56.83% | 14,785 | 1.89% | 492 | 2.84% | 738 | 1.45% | 377 |
| Kern | 36.66% | 48,802 | 56.98% | 75,851 | 1.72% | 2,296 | 2.83% | 3,761 | 1.81% | 2,409 |
| Siskiyou | 36.44% | 5,577 | 53.81% | 8,235 | 3.54% | 542 | 3.02% | 462 | 3.20% | 489 |
| Placer | 36.28% | 34,531 | 57.14% | 54,387 | 2.82% | 2,684 | 2.40% | 2,288 | 1.35% | 1,286 |
| El Dorado | 36.00% | 19,821 | 55.32% | 30,464 | 3.97% | 2,188 | 2.89% | 1,594 | 1.81% | 998 |
| Sierra | 35.77% | 509 | 53.27% | 758 | 3.51% | 50 | 3.87% | 55 | 3.58% | 51 |
| Orange | 35.52% | 219,839 | 57.40% | 355,234 | 2.54% | 15,718 | 2.60% | 16,082 | 1.94% | 12,009 |
| Inyo | 35.54% | 2,195 | 55.17% | 3,408 | 3.71% | 229 | 3.22% | 199 | 2.36% | 146 |
| Shasta | 35.29% | 16,974 | 57.07% | 27,451 | 2.27% | 1,094 | 3.16% | 1,522 | 2.20% | 1,059 |
| Lassen | 34.92% | 2,661 | 56.86% | 4,333 | 2.09% | 159 | 4.03% | 307 | 2.10% | 160 |
| Yuba | 34.90% | 4,006 | 56.50% | 6,486 | 3.36% | 386 | 3.65% | 419 | 1.59% | 182 |
| Colusa | 34.49% | 1,546 | 59.74% | 2,678 | 1.87% | 84 | 2.23% | 100 | 1.67% | 75 |
| Sutter | 33.53% | 6,390 | 60.65% | 11,558 | 1.95% | 372 | 2.59% | 494 | 1.28% | 243 |
| Glenn | 31.72% | 2,042 | 60.44% | 3,891 | 2.87% | 185 | 2.94% | 189 | 2.03% | 131 |
| Modoc | 30.77% | 1,018 | 60.46% | 2,000 | 2.57% | 85 | 3.63% | 120 | 2.57% | 85 |
References
- ↑ "Sen. Boxer to officer: Don't call me ma'am". Washington Times. 2009-06-19. Retrieved 2010-05-25.
- ↑ Sen. Boxer Offers No Apology for Rebuking Brigadier General Who Called Her 'Ma'am'
- ↑ Barbara Boxer is a Senator, damn it, and don’t you forget it (video)
- ↑ Garofoli, Joe (2010-02-05). "Demon sheep' ad may be bad move, experts say". San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved 2010-06-08.
- ↑ snu (2010-04-28). "Wackelnder demokratischer Senatssitz" [Uncertain Democratic Senate seat]. Neue Zürcher Zeitung (in German). Zurich. p. 9.
Sie dürfte sich indes mit ihren filmtechnisch stümperhaften, inhaltlich dümmlichen Werbespots gegen ihren innerparteilichen Widersacher Tom Campbell komprimittiert haben. Darin zeichnet Fiorina den allgemein als kompetent und freundlich geltenden Abgeordneten als gefährlichen Wolf im Schafspelz.
- ↑ Hiltzik, Michael (2009-11-05). "Carly Fiorina's Senate campaign an uninspiring product launch". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 2009-11-08.
- ↑ Lin, Judy (2009-11-07). "Fiorina: 'Shame on me' for not voting more". KTVK. Associated Press. Retrieved 2009-11-08.
- ↑ Mehta, Seema (2010-02-25). "GOP Senate race grows heated over Israel". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 2010-06-08.
- ↑ Freking, Kevin & Hindery, Robin (2010-03-05). "Calif. Senate debate focuses on support for Israel". KPCC. Retrieved 2010-04-12.
- ↑ Mehta, Seema (2010-03-04). "DeVore, Campbell face-to-face in GOP Senate debate; Fiorina to phone in". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 2010-03-05.
- ↑ "Plea Agreement; U.S. v. Al-Arian" (PDF). Nine Eleven Finding Answers Foundation. 2006-02-28. Retrieved 2010-03-08.
- ↑ MegLaughlin, In his plea deal, what did Sami Al-Arian admit to?, St. Petersberg Times, April 23, 2006.
- ↑ Hogue News, "Spirited CA GOP Senatorial Debate," by Eric Hogue (March 5, 2010 – retrieved on March 5, 2010).
- 1 2 Mehta, Seema (March 15, 2010). "Letter on Muslim radical roils GOP Senate race; Website posts text contradicting Tom Campbell's claim of writing on behalf of donor Sami Al-Arian before 9/11.". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved March 15, 2010.
- ↑ "Fiorina aide accused of calling Campbell an anti-Semite – San Jose Mercury News". Mercurynews.com. February 25, 2010. Retrieved March 16, 2010.
- ↑ The Associated Press. ""Calif. Senate candidate on defensive over Israel", ''Associated Press'', March 9, 2010, accessed March 15, 2010". Mercurynews.com. Retrieved March 30, 2010.
- 1 2 3 "Tom Campbell letter stokes controversy over ties to jihadist". Mercury News. March 9, 2010. Retrieved March 14, 2010.
- ↑ Marelius, John (March 14, 2010). "Fiorina lashes out at Boxer, 'destructive elitism'; Senate candidate, opponents squabble at GOP convention". San Diego Union Tribune. Retrieved March 17, 2010.
- ↑ "McLaughlin, Ken, "Candidates for California governor promise to release income tax returns," ''Mercury News'', March 13, 2010, accessed March 17, 2010". Mercurynews.com. Retrieved March 30, 2010.
- 1 2 3 4 Mehta, Seema (January 21, 2002). "Republican Senate candidate's professorial style may be out of step". latimes.com. Retrieved March 30, 2010.
- ↑ "2010 Gubernatorial Primary - June 8, 2010: Official Certified List of Candidates" (PDF). California Secretary of State. 2010-04-09. Retrieved 2010-06-08.
- ↑ Matier, Phillip; Andrew Ross (July 19, 2010). "Boxer calls out Fiorina as multiple yacht owner". San Francisco Chronicle. San Francisco, California. Retrieved 2010-07-28.
- ↑ Fiorina-led HP sold to Iran, Boxer charges
- ↑ "Barbara Boxer for U.S. Senate - News - News Coverage | Boxer and Fiorina set to debate". Barbaraboxer.com. 2010-08-06. Retrieved 2010-08-21.
- ↑ "2010 House and Senate Campaign Finance for California". Federal Election Commission. Retrieved July 25, 2010.
- ↑ Archived November 5, 2010, at the Wayback Machine.
- ↑
External links
- California Secretary of State – Elections and Voter Information
- U.S. Congress candidates for California at Project Vote Smart
- California U.S. Senate from OurCampaigns.com
- Campaign contributions from Open Secrets
- 2010 California Senate Election graph of multiple polls from Pollster.com
- Election 2010: California Senate from Rasmussen Reports
- 2010 California Senate Race from Real Clear Politics
- 2010 California Senate Race from CQ Politics
- Race profile from The New York Times
- Debates
- California Senate Republican Primary Debate, C-SPAN, May 8, 2010
- California Senate Debate, C-SPAN, September 1, 2010], San Francisco Chronicle, KQED KTVU-TV, full video (57:00)
- California Senate Debate, C-SPAN, September 29, 2010, full video (56:54)
- Official campaign sites