Chairman of the Central Inspection Commission of the Communist Party of Vietnam

Vietnam
This article is part of a series on the
politics and government of
Vietnam

The Chairman of the Central Inspection Commission of the Communist Party of Vietnam is the man responsible for the fight against corruption and indiscipline within the party.

Officeholders

No.
[note 1]		 Name
(birth–death)		 Took office Left office Rank
[note 2]		 National Congress
1 Song Hào
(1917–2004)		 20 December 1976 31 March 1982
—
 4th National Congress
(1976–1982)
2 Trần Kiên
(1920–2003)		 31 March 1982 27 June 1991
—
 5th National Congress
(1982–1986)
6th National Congress
(1986–1991)
3 Đỗ Quang Thắng
(1927–2009)		 27 June 1991 1 July 1996 17 7th National Congress
(1991–1996)
4 Nguyễn Thị Xuân Mỹ
(born 1940)		 1 July 1996 22 April 2001 14 8th National Congress
(1996–2001)
5 Lê Hồng Anh
(born 1949)		 22 April 2001 January 2002 12 9th National Congress
(2001–2006)
6 Nguyễn Văn Chi
(born 1945)		 January 2002 19 January 2011
—
 9th National Congress
(2001–2006)
14 10th National Congress
(2006–2011)
7 Ngô Văn Dụ
(born 1947)		 19 January 2011 Incumbent 12 11th National Congress
(2011–2016)

Notes

  1. ↑ These numbers are not official.
  2. ↑ The Central Committee when it convenes for its first session after being elected by a National Party Congress elects the Politburo.[1] According to David Koh, in interviews with several high-standing Vietnamese officials, the Politburo ranking is based upon the number of approval votes by the Central Committee. Lê Hồng Anh, the Minister of Public Security, was ranked 2nd in the 10th Politburo because he received the second-highest number of approval votes. Another example being Tô Huy Rứa of the 10th Politburo, he was ranked lowest because he received the lowest approval vote of the 10th Central Committee when he standing for election for a seat in the Politburo. This system was implemented at the 1st plenum of the 10th Central Committee.[2] The Politburo ranking functioned as an official order of precedence before the 10th Party Congress, and some believe it still does.[1]

References

  1. 1 2 Van & Cooper 1983, p. 69.
  2. ↑ Koh 2008, p. 666.

Bibliography

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 5/28/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.