De Beers

The De Beers Group of Companies
Industry Mining and trading of diamonds
Genre Businesses
Founded 1888
Founder Cecil Rhodes
Headquarters Luxembourg, Luxembourg
Area served
 Worldwide
Key people
 Mark Cutifani (Chairman)
Bruce Cleaver (CEO)
Products Diamonds
Services Diamond marketing and promotion. Community development.
Revenue Decrease$4.7 Billion (FY 2015)[1]
Owner Anglo American
Number of employees
 20,000+
Website debeersgroup.com

The De Beers Group of Companies has a leading role in the diamond exploration, diamond mining, diamond retail, diamond trading and industrial diamond manufacturing sectors. The company is currently active in open-pit, large-scale alluvial, coastal and deep sea mining.[2] The company operates in 28 countries and mining takes place in Botswana, Namibia, South Africa and Canada. Until the start of the 21st century, De Beers effectively had total control over the diamond market as both a monopoly and monopsony of diamonds.[3] Opposition has since dismantled the complete monopoly, though De Beers is still a large shareholder and currently sells approximately 35%[4] of the world’s rough diamond production through its Global Sightholder Sales and Auction Sales businesses.[5]

The company was founded in 1888 by British businessman Cecil Rhodes, who was financed by the South African diamond magnate Alfred Beit and the London-based N M Rothschild & Sons bank.[6] In 1926, Ernest Oppenheimer, a German immigrant to Britain who had earlier founded mining giant Anglo American plc with American financier J.P. Morgan,[7] was elected to the board of De Beers.[8] He built and consolidated the company's global monopoly over the diamond industry until his death in 1957. During this time, he was involved in a number of controversies, including price fixing, antitrust behaviour and an allegation of not releasing industrial diamonds for the US war effort during World War II.[9][10]

History

Foundation

Cecil Rhodes founded De Beers in 1888
Nathan Mayer Rothschild, Baron Rothschild, of the Rothschild family, funded the development of De Beers

The name "De Beers" was derived from the two Dutch settlers and brothers Diederik Arnoldus De Beer (December 25, 1825 – 1878) and Johannes Nicolaas De Beer (December 6, 1830 – June 20, 1883), who owned a South African farm named Vooruitzicht (Dutch for "outlook") near Zandfontein in the Boshof District, Orange Free State. After they discovered diamonds on their land, the increasing demands of the British government forced them to sell their farm on July 31, 1871, to merchant Alfred Johnson Ebden (1820–1908) for 6,600 GBP. Vooruitzicht would become the site of the Big Hole and the De Beer Mine, two successful diamond mines. Their name, which was given to one of the mines, subsequently became associated with the company.[11]

Cecil Rhodes, the founder of De Beers, got his start by renting water pumps to miners during the diamond rush that started in 1869,[12][13] when an 83.5 carat diamond called the 'Star of South Africa' was found at Hopetown near the Orange River in South Africa.[13][14][15] He invested the profits of this operation into buying up claims of small mining operators, with his operations soon expanding into a separate mining company.[16] He soon secured funding from the Rothschild family, who would finance his business expansion.[17][18] De Beers Consolidated Mines was formed in 1888 by the merger of the companies of Barney Barnato and Cecil Rhodes, by which time the company was the sole owner of all diamond mining operations in the country.[16][19][20] In 1889, Rhodes negotiated a strategic agreement with the London-based Diamond Syndicate, which agreed to purchase a fixed quantity of diamonds at an agreed price, thereby regulating output and maintaining prices.[18][21] The agreement soon proved to be very successful — for example during the trade slump of 1891–1892, supply was simply curtailed to maintain the price.[22] Rhodes was concerned about the break-up of the new monopoly, stating to shareholders in 1896 that the company's "only risk is the sudden discovery of new mines, which human nature will work recklessly to the detriment of us all".[18]

The Second Boer War proved to be a challenging time for the company. Kimberley was besieged as soon as war broke out, thereby threatening the company's valuable mines. Rhodes personally moved into the city at the onset of the siege in order to put political pressure on the British government to divert military resources towards relieving the siege rather than more strategic war objectives. Despite being at odds with the military,[23] Rhodes placed the full resources of the company at the disposal of the defenders, manufacturing shells, defences, an armoured train and a gun named Long Cecil in the company workshops.[24]

Oppenheimer control

In 1898, diamonds were discovered on farms near Pretoria, Transvaal. One led to the discovery of the Premier Mine. The Premier Mine was registered in 1902 and the Cullinan Diamond, the largest rough diamond ever discovered, was found there in 1905.[25] (The Premier Mine was renamed the Cullinan Mine in 2003.) However, its owner refused to join the De Beers cartel.[26] Instead, the mine started selling to a pair of independent dealers named Bernhard and Ernest Oppenheimer, thereby weakening the De Beers cartel.[27] Francis Oats, who became chairman of De Beers in 1908, was dismissive of the threats from the Premier Mine and the finds in German South-West Africa.[28] However, production soon equalled all of the De Beers mines combined. Ernest Oppenheimer was appointed the local agent for the powerful London Syndicate, rising to the position of mayor of Kimberley within 10 years. He understood the core principle that underpinned De Beers success, stating in 1910 that "common sense tells us that the only way to increase the value of diamonds is to make them scarce, that is to reduce production".[26]

During World War I, the Premier Mine was finally absorbed into De Beers. When Rhodes died in 1902, De Beers controlled 90% of the world's diamond production. Ernest Oppenheimer took over the chairmanship of the company in 1929,[29] after buying shares and being appointed to the board in 1926.[27][30][31] Oppenheimer was very concerned about the discovery of diamonds in 1908 in German South West Africa, fearing that the increased supply would swamp the market and force prices down.[9][10]

Former CIA chief Admiral Stansfield Turner claimed that De Beers restricted US access to industrial diamonds needed for the country's war effort during World War II.[32]

Marketing

De Beers successfully advertised diamonds to manipulate consumer demand. One of the most effective marketing strategies has been the marketing of diamonds as a symbol of love and commitment.[33] A young copywriter working for N. W. Ayer & Son, Frances Gerety (1916–1999) coined the famous advertising line 'A Diamond is Forever' in 1947.[34] In 2000, Advertising Age magazine named 'A Diamond Is Forever' the best advertising slogan of the 20th century.[35]

Other successful campaigns include the 'eternity ring' (as a symbol of continuing affection and appreciation),[33] the 'trilogy ring' (representing the past, present and future of a relationship) and the 'right hand ring' (bought and worn by women as a symbol of independence).[36]

De Beers is also known for its television advertisements featuring silhouettes of people wearing diamonds, to the music of Palladio by Karl Jenkins. The campaign, titled 'Shadows and Lights', first ran in the spring of 1993. The song would later inspire a compilation album, Diamond Music, released in 1996, which features the Palladio suite. A 2010 commercial for Verizon Wireless parodied the De Beers spots.[37]

Diamond monopoly

Russian president Vladimir Putin meeting with former De Beers chairman Nicky Oppenheimer in South Africa in 2006

De Beers carried out monopoloid practices throughout the 20th century, whereby it used its dominant position to manipulate the international diamond market.[16][38] The company used several methods to exercise this control over the market. Firstly, it convinced independent producers to join its single channel monopoly. When that didn't work, it flooded the market with diamonds similar to those of producers who refused to join the cartel. Lastly, it purchased and stockpiled diamonds produced by other manufacturers in order to control prices by limiting supply.[39]

In 2000, the De Beers business model changed[39] due to factors such as the decision by producers in Canada and Australia to distribute diamonds outside the De Beers channel,[16][38] as well as rising awareness of blood diamonds that forced De Beers to "avoid the risk of bad publicity" by limiting sales to its own mined products.[40] De Beers' market share of rough diamonds fell from as high as 90% in the 1980s to 33% in 2013,[41][42] because of a more fragmented diamond market with more transparency and greater liquidity.[43]

In November 2011, the Oppenheimer family announced its intention to sell the entirety of its 40% stake in De Beers to Anglo American plc thereby increasing Anglo American's ownership of the company to 85%.[44] The transaction was worth £3.2 billion (US$5.1 billion) in cash and ended the Oppenheimer dynasty's 80-year ownership of De Beers.[45][46]

Operations

The De Beers Snap Lake Mine in Canada

Mining in Botswana takes place through the mining company Debswana,[47] a 50-50 joint venture with the Government of the Republic of Botswana. In Namibia, it takes place through Namdeb,[48] a 50-50 joint venture with the Government of the Republic of Namibia. Mining in South Africa takes place through De Beers Consolidated Mines (DBCM),[49] 74% owned by De Beers and 26% by a broad-based black economic empowerment partner, Ponahalo Investments. In 2007, De Beers began production at the Snap Lake Mine in Northwest Territories, Canada;[50] this is the first De Beers mine outside Africa and Canada's first completely underground diamond mine,[51] however production was suspended when the mine was put on care-and-maintenance in 2015.[52] In 2007, De Beers opened the Victor Mine in Ontario, Canada.[53] This was followed by the opening of the company's third mine in Canada, Gahcho Kue, in 2016.[54]

Trading of rough diamonds takes place through two channels – De Beers Global Sightholder Sales[55] (GSS) and De Beers Auction Sales.[56] GSS sells about 90% of De Beers' rough diamonds, features wholly owned and joint venture operations in South Africa (De Beers Sightholder Sales South Africa), Botswana (DTCB), and Namibia (NDTC). They sort, value and sell 33% (2013) of the world's rough diamonds by value.[42]

There are two main types of customer for rough diamonds – Sightholders and Accredited Buyers. Sightholders have a term contract. Accredited Buyers (a customer type introduced in 2014-5) have a more ad hoc arrangement. De Beers also sells about 10% of its rough diamonds through online auction sales. The company pioneered the approach in 2008 when it broke with 44 years of direct sales to hold the diamond industry’s first online international auction sale. It is now the world’s leader in this kind of auction sale.

De Beers employs about 20,000 people around the globe on five continents, with more than 17,000 employees in Africa. Almost 8,000 people are employed in Botswana, around 6,200 in South Africa, nearly 2,900 in Namibia, some 1,260 in Canada and about 320 in Group Exploration.

Business structure and brands

On 4 November 2011, Anglo American plc and CHL Holdings announced their agreement for Anglo American to acquire an incremental interest in De Beers, increasing Anglo American's 45% shareholding in the world's leading diamond company to 85%. De Beers Investments is the privately held ownership company of De Beers Société Anonyme (DBSA), and is registered in Luxembourg. It is made up of two shareholdings: Anglo American plc has an 85% shareholding and the Government of the Republic of Botswana owns 15% directly. De Beers Société Anonyme is the holding company of The De Beers Group of Companies.[57]

The De Beers Group of Companies is involved in many parts of the diamond value chain, from mining to sales, and is made up of a series of joint ventures and wholly owned operations.

The joint ventures are:

The wholly owned operations are in southern Africa and Canada. Also wholly owned are Forevermark and Element Six. Element Six is a joint operation with Umicore (Abrasives) and the wholly owned De Beers business Technologies, UK.

Forevermark

Forevermark launched in 2008 as one of the two diamond brands from The De Beers Group of Companies. According to the company website, "Each Forevermark diamond is inscribed with a promise: that it is beautiful, rare and responsibly sourced." Forevermark diamonds are inscribed with an icon and unique identification number, albeit invisibly to the naked eye: the Forevermark inscription is 1/20th of a micron deep (or one five-thousandth the width of a human hair). This inscription helps keep Forevermark diamonds distinguishable from synthetic diamonds, which are otherwise identical to mined diamonds, and maintain scarcity: the Forevermark website boasts that only a tiny percentage of diamonds qualify for the Forevermark brand.[62]

De Beers Diamond Jewellers

De Beers Diamond Jewellers (DBDJ) was established in 2001 in a joint venture between The De Beers Group of Companies and LVMH, the French luxury goods company.[62] The first De Beers boutique opened in 2002 on London’s Old Bond Street as the brand’s flagship store. Since then, stores have opened in various cities around the world.

Legal issues

Sherman Antitrust Act

During World War II, Ernest Oppenheimer attempted to negotiate a way around the Sherman Antitrust Act by proposing that De Beers register a US branch of the Diamond Syndicate Incorporated. In this way, his company could provide the US with the industrial diamonds it desperately sought for the war effort in return for immunity from prosecution after the war; however his proposal was rejected by the US Justice Department when it was discovered that De Beers had no intention of stockpiling any industrial diamonds in the US.[32] In 1945, the Justice Department finally filed an antitrust case against De Beers, but the case was dismissed as the company had no presence on US soil.[63]

South Africa's missing billions

In 2014, the Leverhulme Centre for the Study of Value, based at the University of Manchester, published a report authored by Sarah Bracking and Khadija Sharife, identifying over $3 billion in price fixing of South African rough diamond trade, through transfer pricing manipulation from 2005 to 2012. The report found significant evidence of profit shifting through volume and value manipulation.[64] Sharife simultaneously published an article [65] disclosing the political system that cultivated revenue leakage, including the donation of De Beers staff to the State Diamond Trader (SDT). The report, like the article, utilised aggregated data produced by the Kimberley Process (KP) certificates of import-exports, relying on figures listed by the diamond companies themselves, in which De Beers was the dominant player. The South African Department of Mineral Resources (DMR) disclosed that De Beers did not authorise them to publish figures involving values, sales, pricing and other data, preventing transparency of the industry.

Diamond prices

From 2001 onwards several lawsuits were filed against De Beers in US State and Federal courts. These alleged that De Beers unlawfully monopolised the supply of diamonds and conspired to fix, raise and control diamond prices. Additionally there were allegations of misleading advertising. While De Beers denied all allegations that it violated the law, in November 2005, it announced that an agreement had been reached to settle civil class action suits filed against the company in the United States and, in March 2006, three other civil class action suits were added to the November agreement. In April 2008, De Beers confirmed that Judge Chesler of the US Federal District Court in New Jersey had entered an order approving the Settlement, resulting in a settlement arrangement totalling US$295 million. De Beers does not admit liability. As part of the settlement, persons who purchased gem diamonds from 1 January 1994 to 31 March 2006, may be eligible for compensation.[66] However, claimants were generally not pleased with the amounts they received from the settlement.[67]

Industrial diamonds

In 2004, De Beers pleaded guilty and paid a US$10 million fine to the United States Department of Justice to settle a 1994 charge that De Beers had colluded with General Electric, which was acquitted of all charges, to fix the price of industrial diamonds.[68][69]

European Commission

In February 2006, De Beers entered into legally binding commitments with the European Commission to cease purchasing rough diamonds from Russian mining company Alrosa as of the end of 2008.[70] In January 2007, the European Commission announced it had closed the file due to lack of Community Interest. The commission decision is under appeal before the Court of First Instance in Luxembourg.[71]

Conflict diamonds and the Kimberley Process

In 1999, a campaign by Global Witness to highlight the role of diamonds in international conflicts led to a review by the United Nations. The initial focus of the UN's investigation was on Jonas Savimbi's UNITA movement in Angola, which was found to have bartered uncut diamonds for weaponry despite international economic and diplomatic sanctions being in effect through United Nations Security Council Resolution 1173.[72][73]

In 1999, De Beers Group claimed to have stopped all outside buying of diamonds in order to guarantee the conflict-free status of their diamonds effective from 26 March 2000.[74][75][76]

In December 2000, following the recommendations of the Fowler Report, the UN adopted the landmark General Assembly Resolution A/RES/55/56[77] supporting the creation of an international certification scheme for rough diamonds. By November 2002, negotiations between governments, the international diamond industry and civil society organisations resulted in the creation of the Kimberley Process Certification Scheme (KPCS), which sets out the requirements for controlling rough diamond production and trade and became effective in 2003.

De Beers states that 100% of the diamonds it now sells are conflict-free and that all De Beers diamonds are purchased in compliance with national law, the Kimberley Process Certification Scheme[78] and its own Diamond Best Practice Principles.[79] The Kimberley process has helped restore the reputation of the industry, as well as eliminating sources of excess supply.[80]

Forceful relocation of indigenous San people in Botswana

In Botswana, a long dispute has existed between the interests of the mining company, De Beers, and the relocation of the San (Bushman) tribe from the land, in order to exploit diamond resources - an allegation rejected by De Beers. The San have been facing threats from government policies since at least 1980, when the diamond resources were discovered.[81] A campaign is being fought in an attempt to bring an end to what the indigenous rights organisation, Survival International considers to be a genocide of a tribe that has been living in those lands for tens of thousands of years.[82][83][84] On the grounds that their hunting and gathering have become obsolete and their presence is no longer compatible with preserving wildlife resources, the Gwi and Gana people were persecuted by the government of Botswana in order to make them leave the central Kalahari reserve. To get rid of them, they had their water supplies cut off and they have been "taxed, fined, beaten, and tortured".[85] Several international fashion models, including Iman, Lily Cole and Erin O'Connor, who were previously involved with advertising for the companies' diamonds, have backed down after realising the consequences raised by this scandal, and now support the campaign.[86]

Another view is that, apparently confounded by the intractability of the Botswana government, Survival trained its guns on Botswana’s diamond industry. Survival points to a diamond prospect in the central Kalahari as the real reason behind the relocations and has identified De Beers as the main villain in this drama. However, the negotiating team, the diamond watchdog Global Witness, and Member of the European Parliament Glenys Kinnock have all said that there was no connection between diamonds and the relocations.

See also

Notes

  1. ↑ De Beers Group:Results for the year ended 31 December 2013, February 2013, Retrieved: 15 February 2013.
  2. ↑ "Mining". De Beers Group. Retrieved 22 December 2014.
  3. ↑ Chang, So-Young; Heron, Amanda; Kwon, John; Maxwell, Geoff; Rocca, Lodovico; Tarajano, Orestes (Fall 2002). "The Global Diamond Industry" (PDF). Chazen Web Journal of International Business. The Trustees of Columbia University: 2. Retrieved 5 July 2016.
  4. ↑ "De Beers' market share to rebound, thanks to Gahcho Kue". Mining Markets. 10 July 2014. Retrieved 14 July 2016.
  5. ↑ The Incredible Story Of How De Beers Created And Lost The Most Powerful Monopoly Ever, Business Insider
  6. ↑ Epstein, Edward Jay (1982). The rise and fall of diamonds: the shattering of a brilliant illusion. Simon and Schuster.
  7. ↑ "New Mining Target: Anglo American". Forbes. 21 August 2006.
  8. ↑ Chilvers, Henry (1939). The Story of De Beers. Cassell. p. 227.
  9. 1 2 Janine P. Roberts (2003). Glitter & Greed. The Disinformation Company. ISBN 0-9713942-9-6. Retrieved 27 November 2008.
  10. 1 2 Theodor Emanuel Gregory (1977). Ernest Oppenheimer and the Economic Development of Southern Africa. Arno Press. Retrieved 27 November 2008.
  11. ↑ Famous people, Cape Town Diamond Museum
  12. ↑ Jessup, Edward (1979). Ernest Oppenheimer : a study in power. London: Collings. pp. 23–24. ISBN 0860360873.
  13. 1 2 Wilson, A.N. (1982). Diamonds : from birth to eternity. Santa Monica, California: Gemological Institute of America. p. 135. ISBN 0873110102.
  14. ↑ Roberts, Brian (1972). The diamond magnates. London: Hamilton. p. 5. ISBN 0241021774.
  15. ↑ Chilvers, Henry (1939). The Story of De Beers. Cassell. p. 5.
  16. 1 2 3 4 Tobias Kretschmer (15 October 2003). "De Beers and Beyond:The History of the International Diamond Cartel" (PDF). New York University. Retrieved 25 November 2008.
  17. ↑ Edward Jay Epstein (1982). The Rise and Fall of Diamonds. Simon and Schuster. ISBN 0-671-41289-2. Retrieved 27 November 2008.
  18. 1 2 3 Lilian Charlotte Anne Knowles (2005). The Economic Development of the British Overseas Empired. Taylor & Francis. ISBN 0-415-35048-4.
  19. ↑ Martin Meredith (2007). Diamonds Gold and War. New York: Simon & Schuster, Limited. ISBN 0-7432-8614-6.
  20. ↑ John Hays Hammond (1974). The Autobiography of John Hays Hammond. Ayer Publishing. p. 205. ISBN 0-405-05913-2.
  21. ↑ Edward Jay Epstein (1982). The Rise and Fall of Diamonds. Simon and Schuster. ISBN 0-671-41289-2. Retrieved 27 November 2008.
  22. ↑ Colin Walter Newbury (1989). The Diamond Ring. Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-821775-7. Retrieved 27 November 2008.
  23. ↑ A Handbook of the Boer War With General Map of South Africa and 18 Sketch Maps and Plans. London and Aldershot: Gale and Polden Ltd. 1910. Retrieved 2 October 2008.
  24. ↑ Ashe, E. Oliver (1900). Besieged by the Boers; a diary of life and events in Kimberley during the siege (1900). New York: Doubleday, Page & Co.
  25. ↑ Levinson, Olga (1983). Diamonds in the desert : the story of August Stauch and his times (1st ed.). Cape Town: Tafelberg. p. 3. ISBN 0624019217.
  26. 1 2 Tom Zoellner (2007). The Heartless Stone: A Journey Through the World of Diamonds, Deceit, and Desire. McMillan. ISBN 0-312-33970-4. Retrieved 27 November 2008.
  27. 1 2 De Beers S.A. Encyclopædia Britannica.
  28. ↑ Farrell-Robert, Janine (2007-04-01), Glitter & Greed: The Secret World of the Diamond Cartel, Red Wheel Weiser, pp. PT171ff, ISBN 978-1-60925-880-1, retrieved 2016-08-17
  29. ↑ Chilvers, Henry (1939). The Story of De Beers. Cassell. p. 310.
  30. ↑ Corbett, Ali (2002). Diamond Beaches: A History of Oranjemund (Second ed.). Namdeb Diamond Corporation. p. 14. ISBN 0620282886.
  31. ↑ Chilvers, Henry (1939). The Story of De Beers. Cassell. p. 227.
  32. 1 2 Janine P. Roberts (2003). Glitter & Greed: The Secret World of the Diamond Empire. The Disinformation Company. pp. 115–121. ISBN 0-9713942-9-6.
  33. 1 2 Edward Jay Epstein (February 1982). "Have you ever tried to sell a Diamond?". The Atlantic Monthly. Retrieved 2 November 2010.
  34. ↑ Cele Otnes, Elizabeth Hafkin Pleck (2003). Cinderella Dreams: The Allure of the Lavish Wedding. University of California Press. pp. 65–66. ISBN 0-520-23661-0.
  35. ↑ "'A Diamond Is Forever': How Four Words Changed an Industry". Voanews.com. 27 Aug 2014. Retrieved 28 Aug 2014.
  36. ↑ Jessica Michault (28 February 2005). "In a show of power, women raise a glittery right hand". New York Times. Retrieved 2 November 2010.
  37. ↑ "AdFreak: Verizon does Big Red, De Beers ad parodies". Adweek.blogs.com. Retrieved 17 July 2010.
  38. 1 2 Jane S. Lopus (2003). Capstone. National Council on Economic Education. p. 61. ISBN 1-56183-516-1. Retrieved 25 November 2008.
  39. 1 2 Campbell R. McConnell, Stanley L. Brue (2005). Economics: Principles, Problems, and Policies. McGraw-Hill Professional. p. 456. ISBN 978-0-07-281935-9. Retrieved 26 November 2008.
  40. ↑ "Betting on De Beers". The Economist. 12 November 2011.
  41. ↑ Zimnisky, Paul (June 6, 2013). "A Diamond Market No Longer Controlled By De Beers". Kitco Commentary. Kitco.
  42. 1 2 "De Beers Analyst and Investor Seminar 2014" (PDF). http://angloamerican.com. Anglo American. External link in |website= (help)
  43. ↑ "A diamond heist in Cannes". The Economist. 3 August 2013. Retrieved 2 April 2014.
  44. ↑ AFP (4 November 2011). "Oppenheimers leave the diamond race with $5bn sale". Mail and Guardian. Retrieved 5 November 2011.
  45. ↑ "Anglo American gains controlling stake in De Beers". Guardian. 4 November 2011.
  46. ↑ "Anglo American Ends Oppenheimers' De Beers Dynasty With $5.1 Billion Deal". Bloomberg. 4 November 2011.
  47. ↑ "Debswana". The De Beers Group. 12 August 2009. Retrieved 17 July 2010.
  48. ↑ "Namdeb". The De Beers Group. Retrieved 17 July 2010.
  49. ↑ "De Beers Consolidated Mines". The De Beers Group. Retrieved 17 July 2010.
  50. ↑ "Mining: Snap Lake Mine". De Beers Canada. Retrieved 17 July 2010.
  51. ↑ "Where we operate". http://www.debeersgroup.com. The De Beers Group of Companies. External link in |website= (help)
  52. ↑ Zimnisky, Paul (December 13, 2015). "Time To Focus On Diamond Basics". Mining Journal (London). The Mining Journal (trade magazine).
  53. ↑ "De Beers Canada". The De Beers Group. Retrieved 17 July 2010.
  54. ↑ "N.W.T.'s Gahcho Kué diamond mine marks grand opening today". CBC News. Retrieved 2016-11-16.
  55. ↑ "Global Sightholder Sales". debeerssightholder.com.
  56. ↑ "De Beers Auction Sales". debeersauctionsales.com.
  57. ↑ "The De Beers Group of Companies". De Beers Group. Retrieved 4 December 2014.
  58. ↑ "De Beers Diamond Jewellers UK - Diamond Engagement Rings, Wedding Rings & more". debeers.co.uk.
  59. ↑ http://www.debswana.com/Pages/Welcome.aspx
  60. ↑ "Diamond Trading Company Botswana - DTCB". dtcbotswana.com.
  61. ↑ "Namdeb Diamond Corporation - On Diamonds We Build. Diamond Mining Company Namibia". namdeb.com.
  62. 1 2 "Our Brands". De Beers Group. Retrieved Jan 16, 2015.
  63. ↑ Edward J Epstein (1982). "18". The Rise and Fall of Diamonds (The Diamond Invention). Simon & Schuster.
  64. ↑ Sarah Bracking and Khadija Sharife http://thestudyofvalue.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/WP4-Bracking-Sharife-Rough-and-polished-15May.pdf
  65. ↑ Khadija Sharife, 100 Reporters http://100r.org/2014/05/rough-and-polished/
  66. ↑ "DeBeers Settlement". diamondsclassaction.com.
  67. ↑ "Court Orders Settlement Distribution to De Beers Direct Purchaser Subclass; Consumer Subclass Members Unhappy With Their Awards". MySettlementClaims.com.
  68. ↑ "De Beers pleads guilty in price fixing case". Associated Press via MSNBC.com. 13 July 2004.
  69. ↑ Margaret Webb Pressler (14 July 2004). "DeBeers Pleads to Price-Fixing: Firm Pays $10 million, Can Fully Reenter U.S.". Washington Post. Retrieved 26 November 2008.
  70. ↑ Alrosa Purchasing Commitments – The De Beers Group Archived 21 June 2009 at the Wayback Machine.
  71. ↑ "CURIA - Documents". europa.eu.
  72. ↑ Michael Fleshman (January 2001). "Targeting 'conflict diamonds' in Africa: Security Council seeks to enforce sanctions against rebels, arms suppliers". UN.
  73. ↑ "Final Report of the UN Panel of Experts ("The "Fowler Report")". Global Policy Forum. 10 March 2000. Retrieved 20 March 2010.
  74. ↑ "De Beers: Come Clean to Be Clean". Mail and Guardian via Global Policy Forum. 24 March 2000. Retrieved 21 March 2010.
  75. ↑ De Beers Group De Beers Report to Stakeholders 2005/6 – Ethics, "Conflict and Instability" De Beers Group. Retrieved 11 February 2007.
  76. ↑ "FAQs". The De Beers Group. Retrieved 17 July 2010.
  77. ↑ "Kimberley Process Certification Scheme". UN. 18 May 2004. Retrieved 25 November 2008.
  78. ↑ "The Kimberley Process (KP)". kimberleyprocess.com.
  79. ↑ Best Practice Principles – The De Beers Group Archived 25 December 2009 at the Wayback Machine.
  80. ↑ Joe Nocera (8 August 2008). "Diamonds are Forever in Botswana". New York Times. Retrieved 15 March 2010.
  81. ↑ "Bushmen". Survival International. Retrieved 17 July 2010.
  82. ↑ "De Beers battles with Survival". Telegraph. London. 17 July 2005. Retrieved 23 July 2009.
  83. ↑ Leithead, Alastair (24 February 2003). "Bushmen 'moved for diamonds'". BBC news. Retrieved 23 July 2009.
  84. ↑ "Botswana diamonds lose their sparkle". Mail and Guardian. 8 July 2005. Retrieved 23 July 2009.
  85. ↑ Monbiot, George (5 August 2003). "Driven out of Eden". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 23 July 2009.
  86. ↑ "Kalahari Bushmen win ancestral land case". The Independent. London. 14 December 2006. Retrieved 23 July 2009.

References

External links

Wikimedia Commons has media related to De Beers.
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 11/27/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.