LGBT rights at the United Nations

LGBT rights at the United Nations

---

	Support	Countries which have signed a General Assembly declaration of LGBT rights or sponsored the Human Rights Council's 2011 resolution on LGBT rights (96 members).
	Oppose	Countries which signed a 2008 statement opposing LGBT rights (initially 57 members, now 54 members).
	Neither	Countries which, as regards the UN, have expressed neither official support nor opposition to LGBT rights (44 members).

Discussions of LGBT rights at the United Nations have included resolutions and joint statements in the United Nations General Assembly and the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC), attention by the expert led human rights mechanisms, such as the United Nations Treaty Bodies and Special Procedures, as well as by the UN Agencies.

Since its founding in 1945, the United Nations political bodies had not discussed LGBT rights (regarding equality regardless of sexual orientation or gender identity) until December 2006, when Norway presented a joint statement on human rights violations based on sexual orientation and gender identity at the Commission on Human Rights on behalf of 54 states. This was followed by a joint statement presented at the General Assembly by Argentina on behalf of 66 states in December 2008. The 2008 statement prompted an Arab League-backed statement opposing it. Both statements remain open for signature, and neither of them has been officially adopted by the General Assembly.

On June 17, 2011, South Africa led a resolution at the UNHRC requesting that the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights draft a report "documenting discriminatory laws and practices and acts of violence against individuals based on their sexual orientation and gender identity" to follow up and implementation of the Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action.^[1] The resolution passed with 23 votes in favour to 19 against, with the three abstentions being Burkina Faso, China, and Zambia. It was the first such resolution and was hailed as "historic".^[2]

The report, which came out in December 2011, documented violations based on sexual orientation and gender identity, including hate crimes, criminalization of homosexuality, and discrimination. High Commissioner Navi Pillay called for equitable ages of consent; comprehensive laws against discrimination based on sexual orientation; prompt investigation and recording of hate crime incidents; the repeal of laws criminalizing homosexuality; and other measures to ensure the protection of the rights of LGBT persons.^[3] The text of the report from the UNHRC is dated on 17 November 2011.^[4]

Separately, it was announced in July 2014 that the United Nations (as an employer) would extend equal benefits to its employees who have entered into same-sex unions in jurisdictions where they are legal.

In September 2014, Brazil, Chile, Colombia and Uruguay led on a follow up resolution at the UNHRC. This second resolution on "human rights, sexual orientation and gender identity"^[5] passed with an increased vote margin (25 to 14, 7 abstentions), reflecting the trend for increased support by member states to address these issues at the international level.^[6] It requested the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights to update the 2011 report ‘with a view to sharing good practices and ways to overcome violence and discrimination, in application of existing international human rights law and standards’. The update was presented to the Human Rights Council in June 2015.

In 2016 the UNHRC passed a resolution to appoint an "independent expert" to find the causes of violence and discrimination against people due to their gender identity and sexual orientation, and discuss with governments about how to protect those people. The milestone resolution has been seen as the UN's "most overt expression of gay rights as human rights".^[7]

Also in 2016, the UN Security Council condemned the 2016 Orlando nightclub shooting; this statement marked the first time the U.N. Security Council used language recognizing violence targeting the LGBT community.^[8]

Background

Worldwide laws regarding same-sex intercourse and freedom of expression and association

	Same-sex intercourse legal		Same-sex intercourse illegal
	Marriage^1		Unenforced penalty
	Marriage recognized but not performed^1		Imprisonment
	Civil unions^1		Up to life in prison
	Unregistered cohabitation^1		Death penalty
	Same-sex unions not recognized
	Laws restricting freedom of expression and association

Rings indicate areas where local judges have granted or denied marriages or imposed the death penalty in a jurisdiction where that is not otherwise the law or areas with a case-by-case application.
¹Some jurisdictions in this category may currently have other types of partnerships.

Same-sex relationships are currently illegal in 76 countries and punishable by death in seven.^[9] In the 1980s, early United Nations reports on the HIV/AIDS pandemic made some reference to homosexuality, and the 1986 Human Freedom Index did include a specific question, in judging the human rights record of each nation, with regards to the existence of criminal laws against homosexuality.

In its 1994 decision in Toonen v. Australia, the UN Human Rights Committee —which is responsible for the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR)—declared that laws criminalizing consensual same sex relations between adults are in violation of international human rights law.^[10]

In 2003, Brazil tabled a resolution (see Brazilian Resolution) at the former UN Commission on Human Rights, stressing that human rights apply to all human beings regardless of sexual orientation. The resolution was indefinitely deferred.

Since 2008, the 34 member countries of the Organization of American States have unanimously approved a series of resolutions affirming that human rights protections extend to sexual orientation and gender identity.^[10]

Since 2000, the UN General Assembly has included a reference to sexual orientation in its biennial resolutions on extrajudicial, summary and arbitrary executions, as did the former Commission on Human Rights.^[6] The latter had also addressed the use of the death penalty for sexual relations between consenting adults in its annual resolutions on the death penalty between 2002 and 2005.^[6] In recent years the General Assembly resolution on executions also covered gender identity as a ground for protection.^[6]

Joint statements

A series of joint statements on sexual orientation and gender identity delivered by UN Member States at the UN General Assembly and Human Rights Council between 2006 and 2011, provides evidence of increasing support for the issues among UN Member States.^[11]

Following meetings between Louis George Tin and French Minister of Human Rights and Foreign Affairs Rama Yade in early 2008, Yade announced that she would appeal at the UN for the universal decriminalization of homosexuality; the appeal was quickly taken up as an international concern.^[12] Co-sponsored by France (which then held the rotating presidency of the EU) and the Netherlands on behalf of the EU, the declaration had been intended as a resolution; it was decided to use the format of a declaration of a limited group of states because there was not enough support for the adoption of an official resolution by the General Assembly as a whole. The declaration was read out into the General Assembly Record by Ambassador Jorge Argüello of Argentina on 18 December 2008, and was the first declaration concerning gay rights read in the General Assembly.^[13][14]

The statement includes a condemnation of violence, harassment, discrimination, exclusion, stigmatization, and prejudice based on sexual orientation and gender identity that undermine personal integrity and dignity. It also includes condemnation of killings and executions, torture, arbitrary arrest, and deprivation of economic, social, and cultural rights on those grounds. The statement asserts: "we recall the statement in 2006 before the Human Rights Council by fifty four countries requesting the President of the Council to provide an opportunity, at an appropriate future session of the Council, for discussing these violations". Additionally, it says "we commend the attention paid to those issues by special procedures of the Human Rights Council and treaty bodies and encourage them to continue to integrate consideration of human rights violations based on sexual orientation and gender identity within their relevant mandate", indicating the Yogyakarta Principles, which provide definitions in detail on sexual orientation and on gender identity as a document on international human rights law.^[15]

Support

Several speakers addressing a conference on the declaration noted that in many countries laws against homosexuality stemmed as much from the British colonial past as from alleged religious or tradition reasons.^[13]

Voicing France's support for the draft declaration, Rama Yade asked: "How can we tolerate the fact that people are stoned, hanged, decapitated and tortured only because of their sexual orientation?"^[13]

UK-based activist Peter Tatchell said of the declaration:

This was history in the making… Securing this statement at the UN is the result of an inspiring collective global effort by many LGBT and human rights organisations. Our collaboration, unity and solidarity have won us this success. As well as IDAHO, I pay tribute to the contribution and lobbying of Amnesty International; ARC International; Center for Women's Global Leadership; COC Netherlands; Global Rights; Human Rights Watch; International Committee for IDAHO (the International Day Against Homophobia); International Gay and Lesbian Human Rights Commission (IGLHRC); International Lesbian and Gay Association (ILGA); International Service for Human Rights; Pan Africa ILGA; and Public Services International.^[16]

Signatories

96 member-states of the United Nations have sponsored the declaration in support of LGBT rights in the General Assembly, in the UNHRC, or in both. Sponsoring nations are listed below.^{[12][17][18][19]}

Africa  Cape Verde  Central African Republic  Gabon  Guinea-Bissau  Mauritius  Rwanda  Sao Tome and Principe  Seychelles  Sierra Leone  South Africa Americas  Argentina  Bahamas  Bolivia  Brazil  Canada  Chile  Colombia initiative  Costa Rica  Cuba  Dominica  Dominican Republic  Ecuador  El Salvador

Guatemala  Honduras  Mexico  Nicaragua  Panama  Paraguay  Peru  United States initiative  Uruguay  Venezuela Asia  Israel  Japan  Mongolia    Nepal  Philippines  South Korea  Thailand  Timor-Leste  Vietnam Europe  Albania  Andorra  Armenia  Austria  Belgium  Bosnia and Herzegovina

Bulgaria  Croatia  Cyprus  Czech Republic  Denmark  Estonia  Finland  France initiative  Georgia  Germany  Greece  Hungary  Iceland  Ireland  Italy  Latvia  Liechtenstein  Lithuania  Luxembourg  Macedonia[20]  Malta  Moldova  Monaco  Montenegro  Netherlands initiative  Norway

Poland  Portugal  Romania  San Marino  Serbia  Slovakia  Slovenia initiative  Spain  Sweden   Switzerland  Ukraine  United Kingdom Oceania  Australia  Federated States of Micronesia  Fiji  Marshall Islands  Nauru  New Zealand  Palau  Samoa  Tuvalu  Vanuatu

Opposition

Among the first to voice opposition for the declaration, in early December 2008, was the Holy See's Permanent Observer at the United Nations, Archbishop Celestino Migliore, who claimed that the declaration could be used to force countries to recognise same-sex marriage: "If adopted, they would create new and implacable discriminations. For example, states which do not recognise same-sex unions as 'matrimony' will be pilloried and made an object of pressure."^[21]

A key part of the Vatican opposition to the draft Declaration relates to the concept of gender identity. In a statement on 19 December,^[22] Archbishop Migliore noted: "In particular, the categories 'sexual orientation' and 'gender identity', used in the text, find no recognition or clear and agreed definition in international law. If they had to be taken into consideration in the proclaiming and implementing of fundamental rights, these would create serious uncertainty in the law as well as undermine the ability of States to enter into and enforce new and existing human rights conventions and standards."^[22]

However, Archbishop Migliore also made clear the Vatican's opposition to legal discrimination against homosexuals: "The Holy See continues to advocate that every sign of unjust discrimination towards homosexual persons should be avoided and urges States to do away with criminal penalties against them."^[22]

In an editorial response, the Italian newspaper La Stampa called the Vatican's reasoning "grotesque", claiming that the Vatican feared a "chain reaction in favour of legally recognised homosexual unions in countries, like Italy, where there is currently no legislation."^[23]

The United States, citing conflicts with US law,^[9] originally opposed the adoption of the nonbinding measure, as did Russia, China, the Holy See, and members of the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation.^[13] The Holy See's Permanent Observer Mission issued a statement saying that the draft declaration "challenges existing human rights norms."^[22] The Obama administration changed the US position to support the measure in February 2009.^[24]

An alternative statement, supported by 57 member nations, was read by the Syrian representative in the General Assembly.^[25] The statement, led by the Organization of the Islamic Conference, rejected the idea that sexual orientation is a matter of genetic coding and claimed that the declaration threatened to undermine the international framework of human rights,^[13] adding that the statement "delves into matters which fall essentially within the domestic jurisdiction of states" and could lead to "the social normalization, and possibly the legitimization, of many deplorable acts including paedophilia" (this is despite the fact that scientific research has shown that homosexuals are no more likely to inflict child abuse than are heterosexuals^[26]).^[9] The Organization failed in a related attempt to delete the phrase "sexual orientation" from a Swedish-backed formal resolution condemning summary executions,^[13] although recently the phrase was removed with 79 votes to 70,^[27] and then subsequently restored by a vote of 93 to 55.^[28]

Signatories

57 UN member nations had initially co-sponsored the opposing statement in 2008:^[29]

Some of these countries later switched their position to support the original resolution backing LGBT rights in 2011, leaving 54 countries as continued sponsors of the statement opposing LGBT rights. The countries which removed themselves as co-sponsors of the statement opposing LGBT who all subsequently switched to sponsoring the statement supporting LGBT rights are specifically noted below.

Africa  Algeria  Benin  Cameroon  Chad  Comoros  Côte d'Ivoire  Djibouti  Egypt  Eritrea  Ethiopia  Gambia  Guinea  Kenya  Libya  Malawi  Mali  Mauritania  Morocco  Niger  Nigeria

Rwanda (Switched to declaration supporting LGBT rights in 2011)  Senegal  Sierra Leone (Switched to declaration supporting LGBT rights in 2011)  Somalia  Sudan  Swaziland  Tanzania  Togo  Tunisia  Uganda  Zimbabwe Americas  Saint Lucia Asia  Afghanistan  Bahrain  Bangladesh  Brunei  Indonesia  Iran

Iraq  Jordan  Kazakhstan  Kuwait  Malaysia  Maldives  North Korea  Oman  Pakistan  Qatar  Saudi Arabia  Syria initiative  Tajikistan  Turkmenistan  United Arab Emirates  Yemen Oceania  Fiji (Switched to declaration supporting LGBT rights in 2011)  Solomon Islands

UN Human Rights Council resolutions and discussion

A resolution submitted by South Africa requesting a study on discrimination and sexual orientation (A/HRC/17/19) passed, 23 to 19, with 3 abstentions, in the UNHRC on June 17, 2011.^[30] This is the first time that any United Nations body approved a resolution affirming the rights of LGBT people.^[31] The resolution called on the office of United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Navi Pillay to draw up the first UN report "documenting discriminatory laws and practices and acts of violence against individuals based on their sexual orientation and gender identity". The votes on this resolution were as follows:

African States (13)  South Africa initiative  Angola — No  Burkina Faso — Abstain  Cameroon — No  Djibouti — No  Gabon — No  Ghana — No  Libya — Suspended  Mauritania — No  Mauritius — Yes  Nigeria — No  Senegal — No  Uganda — No  Zambia — Abstain

Asian States (13)  Bahrain — No  Bangladesh — No  China — Abstain  Japan — Yes  Jordan — No  Kyrgyzstan — Absent  Malaysia — No  Maldives — No  South Korea — Yes  Pakistan — No  Qatar — No  Saudi Arabia — No  Thailand — Yes

Eastern European States (6)  Hungary — Yes  Poland — Yes  Moldova — No  Russia — No  Slovakia — Yes  Ukraine — Yes

Latin American & Caribbean States (8)  Argentina — Yes  Brazil — Yes  Chile — Yes  Cuba — Yes  Ecuador — Yes  Guatemala — Yes  Mexico — Yes  Uruguay — Yes

Western European & Other States (7)  Belgium — Yes  France — Yes  Norway — Yes  Spain — Yes   Switzerland — Yes  United Kingdom — Yes  United States — Yes

The High Commissioner's report, released December 2011, found that violence against LGBT persons remains common, and confirmed that "Seventy-six countries retain laws that are used to criminalize people on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity" (para. 40), and that "In at least five countries the death penalty may be applied to those found guilty of offences relating to consensual, adult homosexual conduct" (para. 45).^[32]

The High Commissioner's report led to a panel discussion by the Human Rights Council in March 2012. The divided nature of the UN, and the Council members in particular, was again evident. UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon described violence and discrimination based on sexual orientation as "a monumental tragedy for those affected and a stain on the collective consciousness" (para. 3), and many others voiced similar concerns. However, "A number of states had signaled their opposition to any discussion of sexual orientation and gender identity by leaving the Council chamber at the start of the meeting", and "A number voiced their opposition on cultural or religious grounds, or argued that sexual orientation and gender identity were new concepts that lay outside the framework of international human rights law" (para. 11)^[33]

The UNHRC adopted a second resolution related to sexual orientation and gender identity on September 26, 2014.^[34][35] Among other things, the resolution calls a report from the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights on best practices for combating discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity. It passed by a vote of 25 to 14, marking the first time the UNHRC adopted a resolution on sexual orientation and gender identity with the majority of its members.^[34][35] The second resolution voting was as follows:

African States (13)  South Africa initiative  Algeria — No  Benin — Absent  Botswana — No  Burkina Faso — Abstain  Congo — Abstain  Cote d'Ivoire — No  Ethiopia — No  Gabon — No  Kenya — No  Morocco — No  Namibia — Abstain  Sierra Leone — Abstain  South Africa — Yes

Asian States (13)  China — Abstain  India — Abstain  Indonesia — No  Japan — Yes  Kazakhstan — Abstain  Kuwait — No  Maldives — No  Pakistan — No  Philippines — Yes  South Korea — Yes  Saudi Arabia — No  United Arab Emirates — No  Vietnam — Yes

Eastern European States (6)  Czech Republic — Yes  Estonia — Yes  Montenegro — Yes  Romania — Yes  Russia — No  Macedonia — Yes

Latin American & Caribbean States (8)  Argentina — Yes  Brazil — Yes  Chile — Yes  Cuba — Yes  Costa Rica — Yes  Mexico — Yes  Peru — Yes  Venezuela — Yes

Western European & Other States (7)  Austria — Yes  France — Yes  Germany — Yes  Ireland — Yes  Italy — Yes  United Kingdom — Yes  United States — Yes

In 2016 the UNHRC passed a resolution to appoint an "independent expert" to find the causes of violence and discrimination against people due to their gender identity and sexual orientation, and discuss with governments about how to protect those people.^[7]

Treatment of UN staff

In July 2014, it was announced that the United Nations (as an employer) would extend equal benefits to its employees who have entered into same-sex unions in jurisdictions where they are legal. Under the new policy, staff who have married a same-sex spouse in a jurisdiction will receive the same benefits and recognition as those in heterosexual marriages, regardless of whether same-sex marriage is legal in their country of citizenship.

UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon has supported a move towards greater respect for gay rights over recent years. He has stated: "Human rights are at the core of the mission of the United Nations. I am proud to stand for greater equality for all staff, and I call on all members of our UN family to unite in rejecting homophobia as discrimination that can never be tolerated at our workplace."^[36]

UN agencies and entities

Agencies and entities in the UN system have increasingly addressed human rights issues relating to sexual orientation, gender identity and intersex status in recent years.^[6] An early and important milestone was passed in 1994 when the World Health Organisation clarified that homosexuality was neither a disorder nor a disease when it removed sexual orientation from the International Classification of Diseases.^[6]

Since then other UN entities have made efforts to integrate issues concerning LGBTI persons into their work, including the OHCHR, the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF), the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), the International Labour Organization (ILO), the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) and the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS).^[6] For example, in 2013 the ILO issued the results of a pilot research on discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity.^[6] In 2014, UNDP released a discussion paper on transgender health and human rights, and UNICEF published an issues paper on eliminating discrimination against children and parents based on sexual orientation and/or gender identity.^[6]

The OHCHR has dedicated efforts to produce an awareness-raising campaign, “Free & Equal”, and related materials, such as fact sheets and infographics, relating to the human rights of LGBTI persons.^[6]

In 2014, the OHCHR, UNDP, UNFPA, UNHCR, UNICEF, UN Women, ILO, UNESCO, WHO, the World Bank and UNAIDS issued a joint report providing a snapshot of the work of UN bodies in combating discrimination and violence based on sexual orientation and gender identity, and related work in support of LGBTI communities around the world, together with a contact list of focal points in each UN entity and links and references to documents, reports and other materials that can be consulted for further information.^[6]

In 2015, the ILO, OHCHR, UNAIDS, UNDP, UNESCO, UNFPA, UNHCR, UNICEF, UNODC, UN Women, WFP and WHO issued a joint statement calling on States to act urgently to end violence and discrimination against LGBTI adults, adolescents and children.^[6]

See also

• Yogyakarta Principles in Action

References

1. Human Rights Council Resolution, 17th session
2. Jordans, Frank (June 17, 2011). "U.N. Gay Rights Protection Resolution Passes, Hailed As 'Historic Moment'". Associated Press.
3. "UN issues first report on human rights of gay and lesbian people". United Nations. 15 December 2011.
4. Discriminatory laws and practices and acts of violence against individuals based on their sexual orientation and gender identity, A.HRC/19/41
5. "HRC resolution 27/32 on "human rights & SOGI"". ap.ohchr.org. Retrieved 2016-05-31.
6. "Norms, case law and practices relevant to sexual orientation, gender identity and intersex status in the United Nations system (Annex 6)" (PDF).
7. Morello, Carol. "U.N. council creates watchdog for LGBT rights". The Washington Post. Retrieved 2016-07-05.
8. "UN Acknowledges Human Rights Violation Against LGBT Community". M.voanews.com. 2016-06-14. Retrieved 2016-07-05.
9. "State-sponsored Homophobia" (PDF). The International Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans and Intersex Association. May 2010.
10. "United Nations: General assembly to address sexual orientation and gender identity - Statement affirms promise of Universal Declaration of Human Rights" (Press release). Amnesty International. 12 December 2008. Retrieved 20 March 2009.
11. "SOGI Joint Statements".
12. "UN: General Assembly statement affirms rights for all" (PDF) (Press release). Amnesty International. 12 December 2008. Retrieved 20 March 2009.
13. MacFarquhar, Neil (18 December 2008). "In a First, Gay Rights Are Pressed at the U.N.". New York Times. Retrieved 20 December 2008.
14. "UN General Assembly press report". 18 December 2008.
15. The Preamble of The Yogyakarta Principles
16. Tatchell, Peter (18 December 2008). "66 countries sign UN gay rights statement". Retrieved 20 March 2009.
17. "Over 80 Nations Support Statement at Human Rights Council on LGBT Rights » US Mission Geneva". Geneva.usmission.gov. Retrieved 2016-07-05.
18. In turnaround, US signs UN gay rights document. Reuters. March 18, 2009
19. http://m.hrw.org/news/2014/09/26/un-landmark-resolution-anti-gay-bias
20. Signed as "the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia"
21. "Vatican criticised for opposing gay decriminalisation". The Irish Times. 2 December 2008. Retrieved 20 March 2009.
22. "Statement of the Holy See Delegation at the 63rd Session of the General Assembly of the United Nations on the Declaration on Human Rights, Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity" (Press release). Holy See. 18 December 2008. Retrieved 20 March 2009.
23. Pullella, Philip; Reuters (2 December 2008). "Vatican attacked for opposing gay decriminalisation". International Herald Tribune. Retrieved 20 March 2009.
24. Pleming, Sue (18 March 2009). "In turnaround, U.S. signs U.N. gay rights document". Reuters. Retrieved 20 March 2009.
25. "Microsoft Word - 10.3_GLBT_UN.doc" (PDF). Retrieved 2016-07-05.
26. Gregory M. Herek, Ph.D.: Facts About Homosexuality and Child Molestation
27. "Archived copy". Archived from the original on December 2, 2010. Retrieved November 28, 2010.
28. "Civil Society Pressures Governments to Successfully Reverse Discriminatory Vote at UN | OutRight". Iglhrc.org. 2010-12-21. Retrieved 2016-07-05.
29. "General Assembly: 70th and 71st plenary meeting, morning session, 02:32:00". United Nations. 18 December 2008. Retrieved 6 January 2008.
30. "UN Human Rights Council". 17 June 2011. Retrieved 17 June 2011.
31. Jordans, Frank (2011-05-17). "UN group backs gay rights for the 1st time ever". Associated Press. Retrieved 2011-05-17.
32. High Commissioner for Human Rights. "Discriminatory laws and practices and acts of violence against individuals based on their sexual orientation and gender identity" (PDF). Retrieved 21 January 2013.
33. Human Rights Council. "Human Rights Council panel on ending violence and discrimination against individuals based on their sexual orientation and gender identity". Retrieved 21 January 2013.
34. Adam Howard (2014-05-01). "UN passes resolution on behalf of LGBT citizens around the globe". MSNBC. Retrieved 2016-07-05.
35. "PH votes yes to landmark UN reso on gay rights". Rappler.com. 2014-09-27. Retrieved 2016-07-05.
36. United Nations will now recognize gay marriage

External links

• BORN FREE AND EQUAL - Sexual orientation and gender identity in international human rights law, 2012 (OHCHR)
• Xavier Colin (3 February 2013). "Droit à l'homosexualité : un monde de différences ?" (video). Geopolitis (in French). Geneva, Switzerland: Radio télévision suisse. « La planète gay » « Homosexualité et évolution ». Retrieved 5 February 2013. Quel est l'état des droits des homosexuels dans le monde ? Quelles sont les tendances régionales vers plus – ou moins – de respect des homosexuels ? Geopolitis décrypte la géopolitique du droit à l'homosexualité. À partir du minutage 07:35, interview de John Fisher, codirecteur de l'ONG ARC International, une organisation qui cherche à promouvoir et défendre le droit des homosexuels dans le monde.