Morris Copeland

Morris Copeland

Morris Copeland
Born (1895-08-06)6 August 1895
Rochester, New York
Died 4 May 1989(1989-05-04) (aged 93)
Sarasota, Florida
Nationality United States
Institution Cornell University 1921–30, 1949-65
NBER 1944-59 [1]
Field Political economics
School or
tradition		 Institutional economics
Influences Thorstein Veblen, Walter W. Stewart, Wesley Mitchell, John Maurice Clark [2]
Influenced Marc Lavoie
Perry Mehrling
Contributions Flow of Funds analysis
Monetary circuit theory
Social accounting
Stock-Flow Consistency

Morris Albert Copeland (August 6, 1895 – May 4, 1989) was famous for his criticism of prevailing macroeconomic theory and recognized as an early developer of modern flow of funds theory.[3]

Life

Born and raised in Rochester New York, Copeland began his university education at Amherst with an interest in philosophy and Greek. Late in his undergraduate studies he encountered teachers Walter W. Stewart and Walton Hamilton and became fascinated with social accounting and economics.[4][5] After graduating in 1917 he went on to the University of Chicago for his graduate studies where he came under the influence of Wesley Mitchell, a man who he came to regard as his mentor and good friend.[6][7] After his doctoral thesis on institutional theory of value supervised by John Maurice Clark, Copeland emerged as an “unreconstructed institutionalist”.[8]

After receiving his Ph.D in 1921, Copeland began teaching economics at Cornell and became a full professor in 1928.[3] Copeland left a lasting impression on generations of students with a socratic teaching style that motivated students to come to their own conclusions. While his manner was described as “courtly”, he subjected his students to intense challenge, both with their deductions and the empirical support for their propositions.[1]

Economic Contributions

Copeland shared the institutionalist skepticism of “economic laws” that purport to be applicable outside of specific historical institutional contexts. He viewed orthodox theory more as expressions of doctrine rather than empirical observation. For example, he saw the quantity theory of money as a mathematical device convenient for neoclassical doctrine rather than as a hypothesis that emerged from solid empirical observation of economic data.[2] Rather than base economics on introspection and mental states that cannot be empirically verified, he wished to engage in what he viewed as a more science-based approach which necessarily proceeds first from observations about an economy’s actual behavior. While organizing principles might be inferred from such observations, the institutionalist perspective was that they are in constant flux and subject to a broader social context. [9] For this reason Copeland published not just in economic publications, but in journals of philosophy, political science, psychology, statistics and accounting.[1]

Copeland’s money flow model

Copeland is recognized for his pioneering work in the study of money flows. He recognized that the social accounting perspective which was used in the study of national income could be enlarged and applied to the study of money flows.[10] In 1949 he introduced his quadruple entry principle - a scheme enlarged on by Hyman Minsky to emphasize the time-dated pattern of cash commitments to examine the microeconomic basis of financial system instability.[11][12] Copeland further developed and applied his perspective in his book "A Study of Moneyflows in the United States”. According to Copeland, when you look at the economy from the micro perspective of money flows, it provides a powerful new way making phenomena visible that are simply abstracted away by the orthodox Keynesian and Monetarist models. Copeland’s flow of funds set of accounts provides an alternative framework and analytical insights that is unavailable from either the Keynesian NIPA framework or the monetarist quantity theory of money framework.[13]

Copeland is recognized as an early Post Keynesian, presenting the view that ‘the changes Keynes introduced represented modifications of neoclassicism, not its rejection’.[14]

For his innovations in money flow theory, many colleagues believed that Copeland should have received the Nobel Prize.[6]

Public Service

In 1933 Copeland took leave to become executive secretary of the Central Statistical Board created by executive order as part of Franklin D. Roosevelt's response to the Great Depression. For his statistical accomplishments in the early years of the New Deal, in 1936 he was elected as a Fellow of the American Statistical Association.[15][16] In 1944, Copeland joined Mitchell at the National Bureau of Economic Research in order to work on money flows research, which after 1947 was continued under the auspices of the Federal Reserve.[17] According to Jacob Cohen who in 1972 performed a review of money flow analysis since 1947, "the breadth of Copeland's moneyflows has been substantially narrowed in the hands of the Federal Reserve and foreign account-makers." [18] As part of its integration into the National Income and Product Accounts system, John Dawson observes that Copeland's flow of funds analysis was compromised by removal of his money circuit calculations.[2]

Publications

References

  1. 1 2 3 Kahn, Fred; Staller, George; Davis, Tom, Morris A. Copeland: August 6, 1895 — May 4, 1989 (pdf), Cornell University
  2. 1 2 3 Dawson, John C., ed. (1996), Flow of Funds Analysis: A Handbook for Practitioners, M.E. Sharpe, p. 80, ISBN 978-1563246456
  3. 1 2 Fowler, Glenn (May 24, 1989), "Morris A. Copeland, 93, Is Dead", New York Times, retrieved 2016-10-01
  4. ↑ Rutherford, Malcolm (2011), The institutionalist movement in American economics 1918–1947: Science and social control, Cambridge University Press, p. 97
  5. ↑ Dawson, John C. (1996), "Copeland as Social Accountant", Flow of Funds Analysis: A Handbook for Practitioners, M.E. Sharpe, p. 94, ISBN 978-1563246456
  6. 1 2 Millar, J.R. (1990), ""In Memoriam: Morris A. Copeland, 1895-1989"", American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 49 (1): 45–46, retrieved 2016-10-02
  7. ↑ De Bonis, Riccardo; Gigliobianco, Alfredo (5 May 2012), "The Origins of Financial Accounts in the United States and Italy: Copeland, Baffi and the Institutions", in De Bonis, Riccardo; Pozzolo, Alberto Franco, The Financial Systems of Industrial Countries: Evidence from Financial Accounts (pdf), Springer Science & Business Media, p. 18
  8. ↑ Dorfman, Joseph (1959), "XVII", The Economic Mind in American Civilization, 5, New York: Viking, As cited in Dawson (1996) p. 100
  9. ↑ De Bonis (2012) p. 24.
  10. ↑ Caverzasi, Eugenio; Godin, Antoine (2013), Stock-flow Consistent Modeling through the Ages (PDF), Levy Economics Institute, p. 5, ISSN 1547-366X, retrieved 2016-10-02
  11. ↑ Lavoie, Marc, The stock-flow consistent approach: background, features, and objectives
  12. ↑ Mehrling, Perry G. (30 September 2015), Minsky's Financial Instability Hypothesis and Modern Economics
  13. ↑ Mehrling, Perry G., "Lecture 4: The Money View, Micro and Macro", Coursera course: Economics of Money and Banking (PDF), Columbia University, p. 6
  14. ↑ Godley, Wynne; Lavoie, Marc (2007), Monetary Economics: An Integrated Approach to Credit, Money, Income, Production and Wealth, Palgrave MacMillan, p. 22, ISBN 0-230-50055-2
  15. ↑ View/Search Fellows of the ASA, accessed 2016-11-19.
  16. ↑ Rutherford, Malcolm (19 September 2013), The Institutionalist Movement in American Economics, 1918–1947: Science and Social Control, Cambridge University Press, p. 108, ISBN 978-1107626089
  17. ↑ Rutherford (2013) p. 112.
  18. ↑ Taylor, Stephen P. (1991), "From Moneyflows Accounts to Flow of Funds Accounts", Flow of Funds Analysis: A Handbook for Practitioners, M.E. Sharpe, p. 105, ISBN 978-1563246456
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 12/1/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.