Nepenthes rajah

Nepenthes rajah
Large lower pitcher of Nepenthes rajah. Mount Kinabalu, Borneo.
Conservation status
Endangered  (IUCN 2.3)[1]
CITES Appendix I (CITES)[2]
Scientific classification
Kingdom:	Plantae
(unranked):	Angiosperms
(unranked):	Eudicots
(unranked):	Core eudicots
Order:	Caryophyllales
Family:	Nepenthaceae
Genus:	Nepenthes
Species:	N. rajah
Binomial name
Nepenthes rajah Hook.f. (1859)
Borneo, showing natural range of Nepenthes rajah highlighted in green.
Synonyms
Heterochresonyms Nepenthes rajah auct. non Hook.f.: A.Slack (1986) [=Nepenthes × alisaputrana] Nepenthes rajah auct. non Hook.f.: G.Cheers (1992) [=Nepenthes × kinabaluensis]

Nepenthes rajah /nᵻˈpɛnθiːz ˈrɑːdʒə/ is an insectivorous pitcher plant species of the Nepenthaceae family. It is endemic to Mount Kinabalu and neighbouring Mount Tambuyukon in Sabah, Malaysian Borneo.^[3] Nepenthes rajah grows exclusively on serpentine substrates, particularly in areas of seeping ground water where the soil is loose and permanently moist. The species has an altitudinal range of 1500 to 2650 m a.s.l. and is thus considered a highland or sub-alpine plant. Due to its localised distribution, N. rajah is classified as an endangered species by the IUCN and listed on CITES Appendix I.

The species was collected by Hugh Low on Mount Kinabalu in 1858, and described the following year by Joseph Dalton Hooker, who named it after James Brooke, the first White Rajah of Sarawak. Hooker called it "one of the most striking vegetable productions hither-to discovered".^[4] Since being introduced into cultivation in 1881, Nepenthes rajah has always been a much sought-after species. For a long time, the plant was seldom seen in private collections due to its rarity, price, and specialised growing requirements. However, recent advances in tissue culture technology have resulted in prices falling dramatically, and N. rajah is now relatively widespread in cultivation.

Nepenthes rajah is most famous for the giant urn-shaped traps it produces, which can grow up to 41 cm high^[5] and 20 cm wide.^[6] These are capable of holding 3.5 litres of water^[7] and in excess of 2.5 litres of digestive fluid, making them probably the largest in the genus by volume. Another morphological feature of N. rajah is the peltate leaf attachment of the lamina and tendril, which is present in only a few other species.

The plant is known to occasionally trap vertebrates and even small mammals, with drowned rats having been observed in the pitcher-shaped traps.^[8] It is one of only two Nepenthes species documented as having caught mammalian prey in the wild, the other being N. rafflesiana. N. rajah is also known to occasionally trap small vertebrates such as frogs, lizards and even birds, although these cases probably involve sick animals and certainly do not represent the norm. Insects, and particularly ants, comprise the staple prey in both aerial and terrestrial pitchers.

Although Nepenthes rajah is most famous for trapping and digesting animals, its pitchers are also host to a large number of other organisms, which are thought to form a mutually beneficial (symbiotic) association with the plant. Many of these animals are so specialised that they cannot survive anywhere else, and are referred to as nepenthebionts. N. rajah has two such mosquito taxa named after it: Culex rajah and Toxorhynchites rajah.

Another key feature of N. rajah is the relative ease with which it is able to hybridise in the wild. Hybrids between it and all other Nepenthes species on Mount Kinabalu have been recorded. However, due to the slow-growing nature of N. rajah, few hybrids involving the species have been artificially produced yet.

Etymology

James Brooke

Joseph Dalton Hooker described Nepenthes rajah in 1859, naming it in honour of Sir James Brooke, the first White Rajah of Sarawak.^[9] In the past, the Latin name was written as Nepenthes Rajah,^{[4][10][11][12][13]} since it derives from a proper noun. However, this capitalisation is considered incorrect today. 'Rajah Brooke's Pitcher Plant'^[14] is an accurate, but seldom-used common name. N. rajah is also sometimes called the 'Giant Malaysian Pitcher Plant'^[15] or simply 'Giant Pitcher Plant', although the binomial name remains by far the most popular way of referring to this species. The specific epithet rajah means "King" in Malay and this, coupled with the impressive size of its pitchers, has meant that N. rajah is often referred to as the "King of Nepenthes".^[16]

Plant characteristics

Click [show] to view a botanical description of Nepenthes rajah. 

Latin description: Folia mediocria petiolata, lamina oblonga v. lanceolata, apice peltata, nervis longitudinalibus utrinque 4–5 ; ascidia rosularum ignota; ascidia inferiora et superiora maxima, urceolata, alis 2 subfimbriatis, ore maximo obliquo; peristomio in collum breve elongato, expanso, 10–30 mm lato, costis 1/2–2 distantibus, dentibus 2–4 x longioribus quam latis; operculo maximo ovato-cordato, facie inferiore prope basin carina valida exaltata; inflorescentia racemus magnus pedicellis inferioribus c. 20–25 mm longis 2-floris, superioribus brevioribus 1-floris ; indumentum parcum, villosum v. villoso-tomentosum.^[13]

Botanical description: Stem: generally prostrate or decumbent; not climbing, coarse, 15–30 mm thick, ≤6 m long (usually ≤3 m), yellow to green in colour, internodes ≤20 cm, cylindrical. Leaves: coriaceous, shortly petiolate, yellow to green in colour, with a wavy outer margin. Lamina oblong-lanceolate, 25–80 cm long and 10–15 cm wide, rounded and peltate at the apex, rounded at the base, abruptly attenuate towards the petiole. Tendril inserted 2–5 cm below the leaf apex. Petiole canaliculate, winged, ≤15 cm long, ≤1 cm thick, dilated at the base, with a sheath that clasps the stem for 3/4 of the circumference. Longitudinal veins 3–4 (rarely 5) on each side, originating from the basal part of the midrib, running parallel in the outer half of the lamina, pennate veins running obliquely towards the margin, irregularly reticulate in the outer part of the lamina. Tendrils about as long as the lamina, ≤50 cm long, 5–6 mm thick near the lamina, 10–25 mm thick near the pitcher, curved downwards, yellow to red in colour, darker near the pitcher. Pitchers: urceolate to short-ellipsoidal, 20–41 cm high,^[5] 11–20 cm wide,^[6] red to purple on the outside, inside surfaces lime green to purple in colour, with two fimbriate wings running almost from the base to the mouth, broader and more fimbriate towards the top, 6–25 mm wide under the mouth, the fringe segments ≤7 mm long, 2–4 mm apart. Glandular region covers the entire inner surface of the pitcher, about 300–800 glands/cm², the glands in the lower part (digestive zone) not overarched, large such that the interspaces only form polygons, overarched in the upper half (conductive/retentive zone). Mouth horizontal to oblique, the front side of the pitcher 1/2 to 2/5 of the back side in length, elongated towards the lid into a neck 2.5–4 cm long. Peristome greatly expanded, 10–15 mm wide at the front side, 20–50 mm wide towards the lid, distinctly scalloped, prolongated at the interior side into a perpendicular lamina that is 10–20 mm wide, the ribs 0.5–1 mm apart at the inner side, 1–2 mm apart at the outer margin, teeth distinct, those of the interior margin 2 to 4 times as long as broad. Lid ovate to oblong, rounded at the apex, cordate at the base, 15–25 cm long, 11–20 cm wide, vaulted with a distinct keel running down the centre, midrib keeled in the basal half below, keel 5–10 mm high at some distance from the base, 3–8 mm wide, no appendages. Lower surface of the lid covered in many elevated glands, those on the keel with a wide mouth, the others with a very narrow one. Spur ≤20 mm long, unbranched, ascending from the back rib of the pitcher close to the lid, about 2 mm thick at the base, attenuate. Intermediate and upper pitchers rarely produced, conical, smaller, lighter in colour; usually yellow, wings reduced to ribs. Male inflorescence: a long raceme, peduncle 20–40 cm long, about 10 mm thick at the base, about 7 mm at the top, cylindrical, yellow-green to orange in colour, the rachis 30–80 cm long, angular and grooved, gradually attenuate. Lower partial peduncles 20–25 mm long, two-flowered, upper ones gradually shorter, one-flowered, all without bract. Flowers brownish-yellow in colour, give off strong sugary smell. Tepals elliptic to oblong, ≤8 mm long, obtuse, burgundy in colour. Staminal column 3–4 mm long, anthers in 1 of 1 1/2 whorls. Female inflorescence: generally like male inflorescence, but the tepals are somewhat narrower. Fruits short-pedicelled, 10–20 mm long, relatively thick, slightly attenuate towards both ends, orange-brown in colour, the valves 2.5–4 mm wide. Seeds filiform, 3–8 mm long, nucleus only slightly wrinkled, if at all. Indumentum: all parts of the plant covered with long, caducous, white or brown hairs when young, mature plants virtually glabrous. Stem with long spreading brown hairs when young, later glabrous. Pitchers densely covered with long spreading brown hairs when young, later sparsely hairy or glabrous. Inflorescences densely covered with adpressed brown hairs when young, later more sparsely hairy in the lower part, indumentum persistent in the upper part on the peduncles and on the perigone, ovaries densely appressedly hairy, fruits less densely hairy to glabrous. Other: colour of herbarium specimens dark-brown in varying hues.^[13][17]

Mature plants bearing both lower and upper pitchers

The characteristic peltate leaf attachment of N. rajah

Nepenthes rajah, like virtually all species in the genus, is a scrambling vine. The stem usually grows along the ground, but will attempt to climb whenever it comes into contact with an object that can support it. The stem is relatively thick (≤30 mm) and may reach up to 6 m in length, although it rarely exceeds 3 m.^[18] N. rajah does not produce runners as some other species in the genus, but older plants are known to form basal offshoots. This is especially common in plants from tissue culture, where numerous offshoots may form at a young age.

Leaves

Leaves are produced at regular intervals along the stem. They are connected to the stem by sheathed structures known as petioles. A long, narrow tendril emanates from the end of each leaf. At the tip of the tendril is a small bud which, when physiologically activated, develops into a functioning trap. Hence, the pitchers are modified leaves and not specialised flowers as is often believed. The green structure most similar to a normal leaf is specifically known as the lamina or leaf blade.

The leaves of N. rajah are very distinctive and reach a large size. They are leathery in texture with a wavy outer margin. The leaves are characteristically peltate, whereby the tendril joins the lamina on the underside, before the apex. This characteristic is more pronounced in N. rajah than in any other Nepenthes species, with the exception of N. clipeata. However, it is not unique to these two taxa, as mature plants of many Nepenthes species display slightly peltate leaves. The tendrils are inserted ≤5 cm below the leaf apex and reach a length of approximately 50 cm.^[17] Three to five longitudinal veins run along each side of the lamina and pennate (branching) veins run towards the margin. The lamina is oblong to lanceolate-shaped, ≤80 cm long and ≤15 cm wide.

A typical terrestrial pitcher

Pitchers

All Nepenthes pitchers share several basic characteristics. Traps consist of the main pitcher cup, which is covered by an operculum or lid that prevents rainwater from entering the pitcher and displacing or diluting its contents. A reflexed ring of hardened tissue, known as the peristome, surrounds the entrance to the pitcher (only the aerial pitchers of N. inermis lack a peristome). A pair of fringed wings run down the front of lower traps and these presumably serve to guide terrestrial insects into the pitchers' mouth. Accordingly, the wings are greatly reduced or completely lacking in aerial pitchers, for which flying insects constitute the majority of prey items.

Nepenthes rajah, like most species in the genus, produces two distinct types of traps. "Lower" or "terrestrial" pitchers are the most common. These are very large, richly coloured, and ovoid in shape. In lower pitchers, the tendril attachment occurs at the front of the pitcher cup relative to the peristome and wings. Exceptional specimens may be more than 40 cm in length and hold 3.5 litres of water^[7] and in excess of 2.5 litres of digestive fluid, although most do not exceed 200 ml.^[19]

The 41 cm pitcher found on The Sabah Society's March 2011 trip to Mesilau

The largest recorded pitcher of N. rajah, measuring 41 cm, was found on March 26, 2011, during a trip to Mesilau organised by The Sabah Society.^[5] The trap was discovered next to a steep sidepath of the Mesilau nature trail and was measured by Alex Lamb, son of Anthea Phillipps and Anthony Lamb, who were also on the trip.^[5] It was collected for preservation at Mesilau Headquarters.^[5] Another trap measuring 40 cm was spotted on the same day.^[5] The previous record for a N. rajah pitcher was 38 cm.^[5][6]

The lower pitchers of N. rajah are probably the largest in the genus by volume, rivaled only by those of N. merrilliana, N. truncata and the giant form of N. rafflesiana. These traps rest on the ground and are often reclined, leaning against surrounding objects for support. They are usually red to purple on the outside, whilst the inside surfaces are lime green to purple. This contrasts with all other parts of the plant, which are yellow-green. The lower pitchers of N. rajah are unmistakable and for this reason it is easy to distinguish it from all other Bornean Nepenthes species.^[20]

A rare aerial pitcher

Mature plants may also produce "upper" or "aerial" pitchers, which are much smaller, funnel-shaped, and usually less colourful than the lowers. The tendril attachment in upper pitchers is normally present at the rear of the pitcher cup. True upper pitchers are seldom seen, as the stems of N. rajah rarely attain lengths greater than a few metres before dying off and being replaced by off-shoots from the main rootstock.^[21]

Upper and lower pitchers differ significantly in morphology, as they are specialised for attracting and capturing different prey. Pitchers that do not fall directly into either category are simply known as "intermediate" pitchers.

The peristome of N. rajah has a highly distinctive scalloped edge and is greatly expanded, forming an attractive red lip around the trap's mouth. A series of raised protrusions, known as ribs, intersect the peristome, ending in short, sharp teeth that line its inner margin. The inner portion of the peristome accounts for around 80% of its total cross-sectional surface length in this species.^[22] Two fringed wings run from the tendril attachment to the lower edge of the peristome.

The huge, vaulted lid of N. rajah, the largest in the genus, is another distinguishing characteristic of this species. It is ovate to oblong in shape and has a distinct keel running down the middle, with two prominent lateral veins.^[23] The spur at the back of the lid is approximately 20 mm long and unbranched.^[24]

Nepenthes rajah is noted for having very large nectar-secreting glands covering its pitchers. These are quite different from those of any other Nepenthes and are easily recognisable. The inner surface of the pitcher, in particular, is wholly glandular, with 300 to 800 glands/cm².^[13]

Flowers

A flowering plant of N. rajah

Nepenthes rajah seems to flower at any time of the year. Flowers are produced in large numbers on inflorescences that arise from the apex of the main stem. N. rajah produces a very large inflorescence that can be 80 cm, and sometimes even 120 cm tall.^[7][24] The individual flowers of N. rajah are produced on partial peduncles (twin stalks) and so the inflorescence is called a raceme (as opposed to a panicle for multi-flowered bunches). The flowers are reported to give off a strong sugary smell and are brownish-yellow in colour. Sepals are elliptic to oblong and ≤8 mm long.^[24] Like all Nepenthes species, N. rajah is dioecious, which means that individual plants produce flowers of a single sex. Fruits are orange-brown and 10 to 20 mm long (see image). A study of 300 pollen samples taken from a herbarium specimen (J.H.Adam 2443, collected at an altitude of 1930–2320 m) found the mean pollen diameter to be 34.7 μm (SE = 0.3; CV = 7.0%).^[25]

Other characteristics

The root system of N. rajah is notably extensive, although it is relatively shallow as in most Nepenthes species.

All parts of the plant are covered in long, white hairs when young, but mature plants are virtually glabrous (lacking hair). This covering of hair is known as the indumentum.

The colour of herbarium specimens is dark-brown in varying hues (see image).

Little variation has been observed within natural populations of Nepenthes rajah and, consequently, no forms or varieties have been described. Furthermore, N. rajah has no true nomenclatural synonyms,^[26] unlike many other Nepenthes species, which exhibit greater variability.

Carnivory

Drowned lizard found in a freshly opened pitcher. The animal was pulled out of the digestive zone for the photograph.

Nepenthes rajah is a carnivorous plant of the pitfall trap variety. It is famous for occasionally trapping vertebrates, even small mammals. There exist at least two records of drowned rats found in N. rajah pitchers. The first observation dates from 1862 and was made by Spenser St. John, who accompanied Hugh Low on two ascents of Mount Kinabalu.^[16] In 1988, Anthea Phillipps and Anthony Lamb confirmed the plausibility of this record when they managed to observe drowned rats in a large pitcher of N. rajah.^[8][16] In 2011, the discovery of a drowned mountain treeshrew (Tupaia montana) in a N. rajah pitcher was reported.^[27]

Nepenthes rajah is also known to occasionally trap other small vertebrates, including frogs, lizards and even birds, although these cases probably involve sick animals, or those seeking shelter or water in the pitcher, and certainly do not represent the norm.^[28] Insects, and particularly ants, comprise the majority of prey in both aerial and terrestrial pitchers.^[19] Other arthropods, such as centipedes, also fall prey to N. rajah.

Nepenthes rafflesiana is one of the few other Nepenthes species reliably documented as having caught mammalian prey in its natural habitat. In Brunei, frogs, geckos and skinks have been found in the pitchers of this species.^[28][29] The remains of mice have also been reported.^[30] On September 29, 2006, at the Jardin botanique de Lyon in France, a cultivated N. truncata was photographed containing the decomposing corpse of a mouse.^[31]

Rattus baluensis feeding on nectar from a pitcher of N. rajah

Mutualism with mammals

Nepenthes rajah has evolved a mutualistic relationship with mountain treeshrews (Tupaia montana) in order to collect their droppings. The inside of the reflexed lid exudes a sweet nectar. The distance from the pitcher mouth to the exudate is the same as the average body length of the mountain treeshrew. These proportions also hold true for N. lowii and N. macrophylla. As it feeds, the treeshrew defecates, apparently as a method of marking its feeding territory. It is thought that in exchange for providing nectar, the faeces provide N. rajah with the majority of the nitrogen it requires.^{[32][33][34][35][36]} In N. lowii, N. macrophylla and N. rajah, the colour of the lower lid surface corresponds to visual sensitivity maxima of the mountain treeshrew in the green and blue wavebands, making the lid underside stand out against adjacent parts of the pitcher.^[37] Of the three species, N. rajah shows the tightest 'fit', particularly in the green waveband.^[37]

In 2011, it was reported that N. rajah has a similar mutualistic relationship with the summit rat (Rattus baluensis).^[27][38] Whereas the mountain treeshrew visits pitchers during daylight hours, the summit rat is primarily active at night; this may be an example of resource partitioning. Daily scat deposition rates were found to be similar for both mammalian species.^[38]

Left: Mammal visitation rates to N. rajah pitchers. White bars show visitation by T. montana and black bars by R. baluensis. The horizontal bar below the x-axis indicates photoperiod, white representing daylight hours and black nighttime.^[38]
Right: Scat deposition rates to N. rajah pitchers. Black squares show the mean number of T. montana droppings found within pitchers; white squares show the mean number found outside pitchers. Black and white diamonds show the same for R. baluensis.^[38]

Other interactions with animals

Pitcher infauna

Culex rajah (left) and Toxorhynchites rajah (right)

Although Nepenthes are most famous for trapping and digesting animals, their pitchers also play host to a large number of other organisms (known as infauna). These include fly and midge larvae, spiders (most notably the crab spider Misumenops nepenthicola), mites, ants, and even a species of crab, Geosesarma malayanum. The most common and conspicuous predators found in pitchers are mosquito larvae, which consume large numbers of other larvae during their development. Many of these animals are so specialised that they cannot survive anywhere else, and are referred to as nepenthebionts.^[39]

The complex relationships between these various organisms are not yet fully understood. The question of whether infaunal animals "steal" food from their hosts, or whether they are involved in a mutually beneficial (symbiotic) association has yet to be investigated experimentally and is the source of considerable debate. Clarke suggests that mutualism is a "likely situation", whereby "the infauna receives domicile, protection and food from the plant, while in return, the infauna helps to break down the prey, increase the rate of digestion and keep bacterial numbers low".^[40]

Species specific

As the size and shape of Nepenthes pitchers vary greatly between species, but little within a given taxon, it is not surprising that many infaunal organisms are specially adapted to life in only the traps of particular species. N. rajah is no exception, and in fact has two mosquito taxa named after it. Culex (Culiciomyia) rajah and Toxorhynchites (Toxorhynchites) rajah were described by Masuhisa Tsukamoto in 1989, based on larvae collected in pitchers of N. rajah on Mount Kinabalu three years earlier.^[41] The two species were found to live in association with larvae of Culex (Lophoceraomyia) jenseni, Uranotaenia (Pseudoficalbia) moultoni and an undescribed taxon, Tripteroides (Rachionotomyia) sp. No. 2. Concerning C. rajah, Tsukamoto noted that the "body surface of most larvae are covered in Vorticella-like protozoa".^[42] At present, nothing is known of this species with regards to its adult biology, habitat, or medical importance as a vector of diseases. The same is true for T. rajah; nothing is known of its biology except that adults are not haematophagous.

Damage caused by pests

Another species, Culex shebbearei, has also been recorded as an infaunal organism of N. rajah in the past. The original 1931 record by F. W. Edwards^[43] is based on a collection by H. M. Pendlebury in 1929 from a plant growing on Mount Kinabalu. However, Tsukamoto notes that in light of new information on these species, "it seems more likely to conclude that the species [C. rajah] is a new species which has been misidentitied as C. shebbearei for a long time, rather than to think that both C. shebbearei and C. rajah n. sp. are living in pitchers of Nepenthes rajah on Mt. Kinabalu".^[42]

Pests

Not all interactions between Nepenthes and fauna are beneficial to the plant. Nepenthes rajah is sometimes attacked by insects which feed on its leaves and damage substantial portions of the lamina. Also, monkeys and tarsiers are known to occasionally rip pitchers open to feed on their contents.^[44]

History and popularity

Hugh Low

Due to its size, unusual morphology and striking colouration, N. rajah has always been a very popular and highly sought-after insectivorous plant. However, despite its popularity amongst pitcher plant enthusiasts, N. rajah remains a little-known species outside the field of carnivorous plants. Due to its specialised growing requirements, it is not a suitable candidate for a houseplant and, as such, is only cultivated by a relatively small number of hobbyists and professional growers worldwide. This being the case, N. rajah is nonetheless probably the most famous of all pitcher plants. Its reputation for producing some of the most magnificent pitchers in the genus dates back to the late 19th century.^[45]

Nepenthes rajah was first collected by Hugh Low on Mount Kinabalu in 1858.^[14] It was described the following year by Joseph Dalton Hooker, who named it after James Brooke, the first White Rajah of Sarawak. The description was published in The Transactions of the Linnean Society of London:^[4]

Nepenthes Rajah, H. f. (Frutex, 4-pedalis, Low). Foliis maximis 2-pedalibus, oblongo-lanceolatis petiolo costaque crassissimis, ascidiis giganteis (cum operculo l-2-pedalibus) ampullaceis ore contracto, stipite folio peltatim affixo, annulo maximo lato everso crebre lamellato, operculo amplissimo ovato-cordato, ascidium totum æquante.—(Tab. LXXII.)

Hab.—Borneo, north coast, on Kina Balu, alt. 5,000 feet (Low). This wonderful plant is certainly one of the most striking vegetable productions hitherto discovered, and, in this respect, is worthy of taking place side by side with the Rafflesia Arnoldii. It hence bears the title of my friend Rajah Brooke, of whose services, in its native place, it may be commemorative among botanists. . . . I have only two specimens of leaves and pitchers, both quite similar, but one twice as large as the other. Of these, the leaf of the larger is 18 inches long, exclusive of the petioles, which is as thick as the thumb and 7–8 broad, very coriaceous and glabrous, with indistinct nerves. The stipes of the pitcher is given off below the apex of the leaf, is 20 inches long, and as thick as the finger. The broad ampullaceous pitcher is 6 inches in diameter, and 12 long: it has two fimbriated wings in front, is covered with long rusty hairs above, is wholly studded with glands within, and the broad annulus is everted, and 1–1½ inch in diameter. Operculum shortly stipitate, 10 inches long and 8 broad.

The inflorescence is hardly in proportion. Male raceme, 30 inches long, of which 20 are occupied by the flowers; upper part and flowers clothed with short rusty pubescence. Peduncles slender, simple or bifid. Fruiting raceme stout. Peduncles 1½ inches long, often bifid. Capsule, ¾ inch long, ⅓ broad, rather turgid, densely covered with rusty tomentum.

One of the earliest known illustrations of N. rajah, published in Life in the Forests of the Far East in 1862.

Spenser St. John wrote the following account of his encounter with N. rajah on Mount Kinabalu in Life in the Forests of the Far East published in 1862:^[46]

Another steep climb of 800 feet brought us to the Marei Parei spur, to the spot where the ground was covered with the magnificent pitcher-plants, of which we had come in search. This one has been called the Nepenthes Rajah, and is a plant about four feet in length, with broad leaves stretching on every side, having the great pitchers resting on the ground in a circle about it. Their shape and size are remarkable. I will give the measurement of one, to indicate the form: the length along the back nearly fourteen inches; from the base to the top of the column in front, five inches; and its lid a foot long by fourteen inches broad, and of an oval shape. Its mouth was surrounded by a plaited pile, which near the column was two inches broad, lessening in its narrowest part to three-quarters of an inch. The plaited pile of the mouth was also undulating in broad waves. Near the stem the pitcher is four inches deep, so that the mouth is situated upon it in a triangular manner. The colour of an old chalice is a deep purple, but that of the others is generally mauve outside, very dark indeed in the lower part, though lighter towards the rim; the inside is of the same colour, but has a kind of glazed and shiny appearance. The lid is mauve in the centre, shading to green at the edges. The stems of the female flowers we found always a foot shorter than those of the male, and the former were far less numerous than the latter. It is indeed one of the most astonishing productions of nature. [...] The pitchers, as I have before observed, rest on the ground in a circle, and the young plants have cups of the same form as those of the old ones. While the men were cooking their rice, we sat before the tent enjoying our chocolate and observing one of our followers carrying water in a splendid specimen of the Nepenthes Rajah, desired him to bring it to us, and found that it held exactly four pint bottles. It was 19 inches in circumference. We afterwards saw others apparently much larger, and Mr. Low, while wandering in search of flowers, came upon one in which was a drowned rat.

Illustration of the first N. rajah plant to be cultivated in Europe, published in The Garden, 1882.

Nepenthes rajah was first collected for the Veitch Nurseries by Frederick William Burbidge in 1878, during his second trip to Borneo.^[47] Shortly after being introduced into cultivation in 1881, N. rajah proved very popular among wealthy Victorian horticulturalists and became a much sought-after species. A note in The Gardeners' Chronicle of 1881 mentions the Veitch plant as follows: "N. rajah at present is only a young Rajah, what it will become was lately illustrated in our columns...".^[48] A year later, young N. rajah plants were displayed at the Royal Horticultural Society's annual show for the first time.^[49] The specimen exhibited at the show by the Veitch Nurseries, the first of this species to be cultivated in Europe, won a first class certificate.^[50] In Veitch's catalogue for 1889, N. rajah was priced at £2.2s per plant.^[51] During this time, interest in Nepenthes had reached its peak. The Garden reported that Nepenthes were being propagated by the thousands to keep up with European demand.

However, dwindling interest in Nepenthes at the turn of the century saw the demise of the Veitch Nurseries and consequently the loss of several species and hybrids in cultivation, including N. northiana and N. rajah. By 1905, the final N. rajah specimens from the Veitch nurseries were gone, as the cultural requirements of the plants proved too difficult to reproduce.^[49] The last surviving N. rajah in cultivation at this time was located at the National Botanic Gardens at Glasnevin in Ireland, however this soon perished also.^[49] It would be many years before N. rajah was reintroduced into cultivation.

Click [show] to view a list of early publications, illustrations, and collections of Nepenthes rajah. 

Early publications: Transact. Linn. Soc., XXII, p. 421 t. LXXII (1859) ; MIQ., Ill., p. 8 (1870) ; HOOK. F., in D.C., Prodr., XVII, p. 95 (1873) ; MAST., Gard. Chron., 1881, 2, p. 492 (1881) ; BURB., Gard. Chron., 1882, 1, p. 56 (1882) ; REG., Gartenfl., XXXII, p. 213, ic. p. 214 (1883) ; BECC., Mal., III, p. 3 & 8 (1886) ; WUNSCHM., in ENGL. & PRANTL, Nat. Pflanzenfam., III, 2, p. 260 (1891) ; STAPF, Transact. Linn. Soc., ser. 2, bot., IV, p. 217 (1894) ; BECK, Wien. Ill. Gartenz., 1895, p. 142, ic. 1 (1895) ; MOTT., Dict., III, p. 451 (1896) ; VEITCH, Journ. Roy. Hort. Soc., XXI, p. 234 (1897) ; BOERL., Handl., III, 1, p. 54 (1900) ; HEMSL., Bot. Mag., t. 8017 (1905) ; Gard. Chron., 1905, 2, p. 241 (1905) ; MACF., in ENGL., Pflanzenr., IV, 111, p. 46 (1908) ; in BAIL., Cycl., IV, p. 2129, ic. 2462, 3 (1919) ; MERR., Bibl. Enum. Born., p. 284 (1921) ; DANS., Trop. Nat., XVI, p. 202, ic. 7 (1927).^[13]

Early illustrations: Transact. Linn. Soc., XXII, t. LXXII (1859) optima; Gard. Chron., 1881, 2, p. 493 (1881) bona, asc. 1 ; Gartenfl., 1883, p. 214 (1883) bona, asc. 1 ; Wien. Ill. Gartenfl., 1895, p. 143, ic. 1 (1895) asc. 1 ; Journ. Roy. Hort. Soc., XXI, p. 228 (1897) optima; Bot. Mag., t. 8017 (1905) optima; BAIL., Cycl., IV, ic. 2462, 3 (1919) asc. 1 ; Trop. Nat., XVI, p. 203 (1927) asc. 1.^[13]

Early collections: North Borneo. Mt. Kinabalu, IX 1913, Herbarium of the Sarawak Museum (material without flowers or fruits) ; Marai-parai Spur, 1-4 XII 1915, Clemens 11073, Herbarium Bogoriense, the Herbarium of the Buitenzorg Botanic Gardens (male and female material) ; 1650 m, 1892, Haviland 1812/1852, Herbarium of the Sarawak Museum (male and female material).^[13]

Recent popularity

A memorial stained glass window in St Leonard's Church, Sheepstor, Devon, England, dedicated to those from Sarawak who died in World War II. It depicts a pair of pitcher plants, which the church guide describes as "a typical native pitcher plant - Naperthes Rajah [sic]", although they appear to be N. edwardsiana

In recent years there has been renewed interest in Nepenthes worldwide. Much of the plants' current popularity can probably be attributed to Shigeo Kurata, whose book Nepenthes of Mount Kinabalu (1976), which featured the best colour photography of Nepenthes to date, did much to bring attention to these unusual plants.

Not surprisingly, N. rajah is a relatively well known plant in Malaysia, especially its native Sabah. The species is often used to promote Sabah, and specifically Kinabalu National Park, as a tourist destination, and features prominently on postcards from the region. Nepenthes rajah has appeared on the covers of several popular Nepenthes publications, including Nepenthes of Mount Kinabalu (Kurata, 1976) and Nepenthes of Borneo (Clarke, 1997), both published in Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia. On April 6, 1996, Malaysia issued a series of four postage stamps depicting some of its more famous Nepenthes species. Two 30¢ stamps, featuring N. macfarlanei and N. sanguinea, as well as two 50¢ stamps, depicting N. lowii and N. rajah, were released.^[52] The N. rajah stamp has been assigned a unique identification number in two popular stamp numbering systems: Scott #580 and Yvert #600. Curiously, the peltate leaf attachment that is so characteristic of this species is not shown. Nepenthes rajah was featured in the first episode of Kingdom of Plants 3D, a natural history documentary series presented by David Attenborough.^[53]

Classification

Regiae Clade
N. maxima			N. pilosa			N. clipeata
N. oblanceolata *			N. burbidgeae			N. truncata
N. veitchii			N. rajah			N. fusca
N. ephippiata			N. boschiana			N. stenophylla **
N. klossii			N. mollis			N. lowii
* Now considered a junior synonym of N. maxima.  ** Danser's description was based on the type specimen of N. fallax.
Distribution of the Regiae, based on Danser (1928).  Note: it is now known that N. maxima is absent from Borneo.

Nepenthes rajah is not generally considered to be closely related to any other species, due to its unusual pitcher and leaf morphology. However, several attempts have been made to deduce natural groupings within the Nepenthes genus, which have grouped N. rajah with other species thought to share certain traits with it.

The Nepenthes were first split up in 1873, when Hooker published his monograph on the genus, titled "Nepenthaceae". Hooker distinguished N. pervillei from all other taxa based on its seeds, which lack the appendages typical of most Nepenthes. He placed it in the monotypic subgenus Anourosperma. All other species were subsumed in the second subgenus, Eunepenthes.

A second attempt to establish a natural subdivision within the genus was made in 1895 by Günther Beck von Mannagetta und Lerchenau in "Die Gattung Nepenthes".^[54] Beck kept the two subgenera created by Hooker, but divided Eunepenthes into three subgroups: Retiferae, Apruinosae and Pruinosae. Nepenthes rajah formed part of the Apruinosae (Latin: pl. of apruinosa: not frosted).

Nepenthes taxonomy was once again revised in 1908 by John Muirhead Macfarlane in his own monograph, "Nepenthaceae".^[55] Oddly, Macfarlane did not name the groups he distinguished. His revision is not generally considered to be a natural division of the genus.

In 1928, B. H. Danser published his seminal monograph, "The Nepenthaceae of the Netherlands Indies", in which he divided Nepenthes into six clades, based on observations of herbarium material.^[56] The clades were: the Vulgatae, Montanae, Nobiles, Regiae, Insignes and Urceolatae. Danser placed N. rajah in the Regiae (Latin: pl. of rēgia: royal). The Regiae clade as proposed by Danser is shown in the adjacent table.

Most of the species in this clade are large plants with petiolate leaves, an indumentum of coarse reddish-brown hairs, raceme-like inflorescence, and funnel-shaped (infundibulate) upper pitchers. All bear a characteristic appendage on the lower surface of the lid near the apex. With the exception of N. lowii, the Regiae all have a mostly flattened or expanded peristome. The majority of species comprising Regiae are endemic to Borneo. Based on current understanding of the genus, Regiae appears to reflect the relationships of its members quite well, although the same cannot be said for the other clades.^[57] Despite this, Danser's classification was undoubtedly a great improvement on previous attempts.

The taxonomical work of Danser (1928) was revised by Hermann Harms in 1936. Harms divided Nepenthes into three subgenera: Anurosperma Hooker.f. (1873), Eunepenthes Hooker.f. (1873) and Mesonepenthes Harms (1936) (Latin: meso: middle; "middle" Nepenthes). The Nepenthes species found in the subgenera Anurosperma and Mesonepenthes differ from those in the Vulgatae, where Danser had placed them. Harms included N. rajah in the subgenus Eunepenthes together with the great majority of other Nepenthes; Anurosperma was a monotypic subgenus, while Mesonepenthes contained only three species. He also created an additional clade, the Distillatoriae (after N. distillatoria).

In his 1976 book, Nepenthes of Mount Kinabalu, Shigeo Kurata presented detailed photographs of lid nectar glands and the digestive glands of the trap interior. He divided the latter into the "lower", "upper" and "middle" parts.

Distribution of phenolic compounds and leucoanthocyanins in N. × alisaputrana, N. burbidgeae and N. rajah
Taxon	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	Specimen
N. × alisaputrana	+	++	3+	3+	+	++	3+	+	J2442
in vitro	+	++	3+	3+	+	++	+	+
N. burbidgeae	3+	++	3+	3+	-	+	-	-	J2484
N. rajah	-	-	+	±	++	++	3+	+	J2443
Key: 1: Phenolic acid, 2: Ellagic acid, 3: Quercetin, 4: Kaempferol, 5: Luteolin, 6: 'Unknown Flavonoid 1', 7: 'Unknown Flavonoid 3', 8: Cyanidin ±: very weak spot, +: weak spot, ++: strong spot, 3+: very strong spot, -: absent, J = Jumaat Source: "OnLine Journal of Biological Sciences 2 (9): 623–625.".

Biochemical analysis

More recently, biochemical analysis has been used as a means to determine cladistical relationships between Nepenthes species. In 1975, David E. Fairbrothers et al.^[58] first suggested a link between chemical properties and certain morphological groupings, based on the theory that morphologically similar plants produce chemical constituents with similar therapeutic effects.^[59]

In 2002, phytochemical screening and analytical chromatography were used to study the presence of phenolic compounds and leucoanthocyanins in several naturally-occurring hybrids and their putative parental species (including N. rajah) from Sabah and Sarawak.^[59] The research was based on leaf material from nine dry herbarium specimens. Eight spots containing phenolic acids, flavonols, flavones, leucoanthocyanins and 'unknown flavonoid' 1 and 3 were identified from chromatographic profiles. The distributions of these in the hybrid N. × alisaputrana and its putative parental species N. rajah and N. burbidgeae are shown in the adjacent table. A specimen of N. × alisaputrana grown from tissue culture (in vitro) was also tested.

Phenolic and ellagic acids were undetected in N. rajah, while concentrations of kaempferol were found to be very weak. Chromatographic patterns of the N. × alisaputrana samples studied showed complementation of its putative parental species.^[59]

Myricetin was found to be absent from all studied taxa. This agrees with the findings of previous authors (R. M. Som in 1988; M. Jay and P. Lebreton in 1972)^[60][61] and suggests that the absence of a widely distributed compound like myricetin among the Nepenthes examined might provide "additional diagnostic information for these six species".^[62]

Several proteins and nucleotides of N. rajah have been either partially or completely sequenced. These are as follows:

• translocated tRNA-Lys (trnK) pseudogene (DQ007139)^[63]
• trnK gene & maturase K (matK) gene (AF315879)^[64]
• trnK gene & maturase K (matK) gene (AF315880)^[64]
• maturase K (AAK56010)^[64]
• maturase K (AAK56011)^[64]

Related species

In 1998, a striking new species of Nepenthes was discovered in the Philippines by Andreas Wistuba. Temporarily dubbed N. sp. Palawan 1, it bears a close resemblance to N. rajah in terms of pitcher and leaf morphology. In 2007, the species was described by Wistuba and Joachim Nerz as N. mantalingajanensis.^[65]

Ecology

Kinabalu

Mount Kinabalu, Borneo

Nepenthes rajah has a very localised distribution, being restricted to Mount Kinabalu and neighbouring Mount Tambuyukon, both located in Kinabalu National Park, Sabah, Malaysian Borneo.^[3] Mount Kinabalu is a massive granitic dome structure that is geologically young and formed from the intrusion and uplift of a granitic batholith. At 4095.2 m, it is by far the tallest mountain on the island of Borneo and one of the highest peaks in Southeast Asia.^[66] The lower slopes of the mountain are mainly composed of sandstone and shale, transformed from marine sand and mud about 35 million years ago. Intrusive ultramafic (serpentine) rock was uplifted with the core of the batholith and forms a collar around the mountain. It is on these ultramafic soils that the flora of Mount Kinabalu exhibits the greatest levels of endemicity and many of the area's rarest species can be found here.

Ultramafic outcrops (yellow) in Kinabalu National Park (green)

Substrate

Nepenthes rajah seems to grow exclusively on serpentine soils containing high concentrations of nickel and chromium, which are toxic to many plant species.^[15] Its tolerance of these, therefore, means that it can grow in an ecological niche where it faces less competition for space and nutrients.^[67] The root systems of N. × alisaputrana^[68] and N. villosa^[69] are also known to be resistant to the heavy metals present in serpentine substrates. These soils are also rich in magnesium and are slightly alkaline as a result. They often form a relatively thin layer over a base of ultramafic rock and are thus known as ultramafic soils. Ultramafic soils are thought to cover approximately 16% of Kinabalu National Park. These soils have high levels of endemicity in many taxonomic groups, not least the Nepenthes. Four species in the genus, including N. rajah, can only be found within the boundaries of the park.

Temperature and humidity readings taken along the "Nepenthes rajah Nature Trail" (~2000 m a.s.l.) at around 10 am during an overcast sky

Nepenthes rajah usually grows in open, grassy clearings on old land slips and flat ridge tops, particularly in areas of seeping ground water, where the soil is loose and permanently moist. Although these sites can receive very high rainfall, excess water drains away quickly, preventing the soil from becoming waterlogged. N. rajah can often be found growing in grassy undergrowth, especially among sedges.

Climate

Nepenthes rajah has an altitudinal distribution of 1500–2650 m a.s.l.^[9][26] and is thus considered an (ultra) highland or Upper Montane plant.^[70] In the upper limit of its range, night-time temperatures may approach freezing and day-time maxima rarely exceed 25 ℃.^[71] Due to the night-time temperature drop, relative air humidity increases significantly, rising from 65–75% to over 95%. Vegetation at this height is very stunted and slow-growing due to the extreme environmental conditions that prevail. Plants are often subjected to fierce winds and driving rain, as well as exposure to intense direct sunlight. The relatively open vegetation of the upper montane forest also experiences greater fluctuations in temperature and humidity compared with lower altitudes. These changes are largely governed by the extent of cloud cover. In the absence of clouds, temperatures rise rapidly, humidity drops, and light levels may be very high. When cloud cover returns, temperatures and light levels fall, while humidity levels increase.^[72] Average annual precipitation in this region is around 3000 mm.

Conservation status

Endangered species

Distribution within Kinabalu National Park

Nepenthes rajah is classified as Endangered (EN – B1+2e) on the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species.^[1] It is also listed on Schedule I, Part II of the Wildlife Conservation Enactment (WCE) 1997^[73] and CITES Appendix I,^[74] which prohibits international trade in plants collected from the wild. However, due to its popularity among collectors, many plants have been removed from the wild illegally,^[75] even though the species' distribution lies entirely within the bounds of Kinabalu Park. This led to some populations being severely depleted by over-collection in the 1970s and eventually resulted in the species' inclusion in CITES Appendix I in 1981.^[76] Together with N. khasiana, it is one of only two species in the genus to feature on this list; all other Nepenthes species are covered by Appendix II.

This being the case, however, the short-term future of N. rajah seems to be relatively secure and it would perhaps be more accurately classified as Vulnerable (VU) or, taking into account protected populations in National Parks, Lower Risk conservation dependent (LR (cd)).^[77] This agrees with the conservation status of N. rajah according to the World Conservation Monitoring Centre (WCMC), under which it is also considered Vulnerable. Furthermore, the species was originally treated as Vulnerable (V) by the IUCN prior to the introduction of the 1994 threat categories.

Although N. rajah has a restricted distribution and is often quoted as a plant in peril,^[78] it is not rare in the areas where it does grow and most populations are now off-limits to visitors and lie in remote parts of Kinabalu National Park. Furthermore, N. rajah has a distinctive leaf shape making it difficult to illegally ship abroad even if the pitchers are removed, as an informed customs official should be able to identify it.

The recent advent of artificial tissue culture, or more specifically in vitro, technology in Europe and the United States has meant that plants can be produced in large numbers and sold at relatively low prices (~US$20–$30 in the case of N. rajah). In vitro propagation refers to production of whole plants from cell cultures derived from explants (generally seeds). This technology has, to a large extent, removed the incentive for collectors to travel to Sabah to collect the plant illegally, and demand for wild-collected plants has fallen considerably in recent years.^[79]

Rob Cantley, a prominent conservationist and artificial propagator of Nepenthes plants, assesses the current status of plants in the wild as follows:^[80]

This species grows in at least 2 distinct sub-populations, both of which are well protected by Sabah National Parks Authority. One of the populations grows in an area public access to which is strictly prohibited without permit. However, there has been a decline in population of mature individuals in the better known and less patrolled site. This is largely due to damage to habitat and plants by careless visitors rather than organised collection of plants. Nepenthes rajah has become common in cultivation in recent years as a result of the availability of inexpensive clones from tissue culture. I believe that these days commercial collection of this species from the wild is negligible.

This being the case, however, it appears that the genetic variability of cultivated N. rajah plants is very small, as all commercially available tissue-cultured plants are thought to belong to just four clones originating from the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew in London, England.

However, illegal collection is not the only threat facing plants in the wild. The El Niño climatic phenomenon of 1997/98 had a catastrophic effect on the Nepenthes species on Mount Kinabalu.^[81] The dry period that followed severely depleted some natural populations. Forest fires broke out in 9 locations in Kinabalu Park, covering a total area of 25 square kilometres and generating large amounts of smog. During the El Niño period, many plants were temporarily transferred to the park nursery to save at least some individuals. These were later replanted in the "Nepenthes Garden" in Mesilau (see below). In spite of this, N. rajah was one of the less affected species and relatively few plants perished as a result. Since then, Ansow Gunsalam has established a nursery close to the Mesilau Lodge at the base of Kinabalu Park to protect the endangered species of that area, including N. rajah.

Plant on display at the Kinabalu "Mountain Garden"

Restricted distribution

The newly opened Mesilau Nature Resort, which lies near the golf course behind the village of Kundasang, is now the only place where regular visitors can hope to see this species in its natural habitat.^[82] Here, several dozen N. rajah plants grow near the top of a steep landslide. Both young and mature plants are present, some with sizable pitchers that may occasionally exceed 40 cm in height^[5] (see image). Daily guided tours are organised to the "Nepenthes Garden" where these plants are located. The "Nepenthes rajah Nature Trail" is subject to a fee and operates daily from 9:00 am to 4:00 pm. Almost all other natural populations of this species occur in remote parts of Kinabalu National Park, which are off-limits to tourists.^[82] Visitors to the park can also see N. rajah on display in the nursery adjoining the "Mountain Garden" at Kinabalu Park Headquarters.^[83]

Other known localities of wild N. rajah populations include the Marai Parai plateau, Mesilau East River near Mesilau Cave, the Upper Kolopis River, and the eastern slope of Mount Tambuyukon.^[84] On Pig Hill, N. rajah grows at 1950–2320 m^[85] and is sympatric with N. burbidgeae, N. tentaculata, and the natural hybrid N. × alisaputrana.^[86]

Natural hybrids

N. rajah × N. tentaculata

N. rajah × N. stenophylla

Nepenthes rajah is known to hybridise with several other species with which it is sympatric. It seems to flower at any time of year and for this reason it hybridises relatively easily. Charles Clarke also notes that "N. rajah, more than any other species, appears to have been successful in having its pollen transported over considerable distances. Consequently, a number of putative N. rajah hybrids exist without the parent plant growing nearby". However, it appears that the limit as to how far pollen can be transported is approximately 10 km.^[87] Hybrids between N. rajah and all other Nepenthes species on Mount Kinabalu have been recorded.^[3][88] Due to the slow-growing nature of N. rajah, few hybrids involving it have been artificially produced yet.^[89]

At present, the following natural hybrids are known:^[26]

• N. burbidgeae × N. rajah [=N. × alisaputrana J.H.Adam & Wilcock (1992)]
• N. edwardsiana × N. rajah
• N. fusca × N. rajah
• N. lowii × N. rajah^[90]
• N. macrovulgaris × N. rajah
• N. rajah × N. stenophylla
• N. rajah × N. tentaculata
• N. rajah × N. villosa [=N. × kinabaluensis Sh.Kurata (1976) nom.nud.]

The "Mountain Garden" of Kinabalu National Park contains a number of well-grown Nepenthes, including the rare hybrid N. rajah × N. stenophylla. This plant has leaves resembling those of N. stenophylla, but the lid and wings are typical of N. rajah. The peristome is strongly influenced by N. stenophylla and bristles are present at the border of the lid, a unique characteristic of this hybrid.^[91] It occurs at an altitude of 1500–2600 m.

A single example of N. lowii × N. rajah grows along the Mesilau nature trail.^[88][90]

Two hybrids of N. rajah have been formally described and given specific names: N. × alisaputrana and N. × kinabaluensis. Both are listed on CITES Appendix II and the latter is also considered Endangered (EN (D)) under current IUCN criteria.^[92]

Nepenthes × alisaputrana

Nepenthes × alisaputrana

Nepenthes × alisaputrana (originally published as "Nepenthes × alisaputraiana")^[93] is named in honour of Datuk Lamri Ali, Director of Sabah Parks. It is only known from a few remote localities within Kinabalu National Park where is grows in stunted, open vegetation over serpentine soils at around 2000 m above sea level, often amongst populations of N. burbidgeae. This plant is notable for combining the best characters of both parent species, not least the size of its pitchers, which rival those of N. rajah in volume (≤35 cm high, ≤20 cm wide).^[94] The other hybrids involving N. rajah do not exhibit such impressive proportions. The pitchers of N. × alisaputrana can be distinguished from those of N. burbidgeae by a broader peristome, larger lid and simply by their sheer size. The hybrid differs from its other parent, N. rajah, by its lid structure, indumentum of short, brown hairs, narrower and more cylindrical peristome, and pitcher colour, which is usually yellow-green with red or brown flecking. For this reason, Phillipps and Lamb (1996) gave it the common name Leopard pitcher-plant, though this is rarely used. The peristome is green to dark red and striped with purple bands. Leaves are often slightly peltate. The plant climbs well and aerial pitchers are frequently produced. N. × alisaputrana more closely resembles N. rajah than N. burbidgeae, but it is difficult to confuse this plant with either. However, this mistake has previously been made on at least one occasion; a pitcher illustrated in Insect Eating Plants & How To Grow Them (Slack, 1986) as being N. rajah was in fact N. burbidgeae × N. rajah.^[95][96]

Nepenthes × kinabaluensis

Nepenthes × kinabaluensis

Nepenthes × kinabaluensis is another impressive plant. The pitchers get large also, but do not compare to those of N. rajah or N. × alisaputrana. It is a well-known natural hybrid of what many consider to be the two most spectacular Nepenthes species of Borneo: N. rajah and N. villosa. Nepenthes × kinabaluensis is only found on Mount Kinabalu (hence the name) and nearby Mount Tambuyukon, where the two parent species are occur sympatrically.^[97] More specifically, plants are known from a footpath near Paka Cave and several places along an unestablished route on a south-east ridge, which lies on the west side of the Upper Kolopis River.^[98] The only accessible location from which this hybrid is known is the Kinabalu summit trail, between Layang-Layang and the helipad, where it grows at about 2900 m in a clearing dominated by Dacrydium gibbsiae and Leptospermum recurvum trees. Nepenthes × kinabaluensis has an altitudinal distribution of 2420 to 3030 m.^[99] It grows in open areas in cloud forest. This hybrid can be distinguished from N. rajah by the presence of raised ribs that line the inner edge of the peristome and end with elongated teeth. These are more prominent than those found in N. rajah and are clue as to the hybrid's parentage (N. villosa has highly developed peristome ribs). The peristome is coarse and expanded at the margin (but not scalloped like that of N. rajah), the lid orbiculate or reniformed and almost flat. In general, pitchers are larger than those of N. villosa and the tendril joins the apex about 1–2 cm below the leaf tip, a feature which is characteristic of N. rajah.^[100] In older plants, the tendril can be almost woody. Nepenthes × kinabaluensis has an indumentum of villous hairs covering the pitchers and leaf margins, which is approximately intermediate between the parents. Lower pitchers have two fringed wings, whereas the upper pitchers usually lack these. The colour of the pitcher varies from yellow to scarlet. Nepenthes × kinabaluensis seems to produce upper pitchers more readily than either of its parents. In all respects N. × kinabaluensis is intermediate between the two parent species and it is easy to distinguish from all other Nepenthes of Borneo. However, it has been confused once before, when the hybrid was labelled as N. rajah in Letts Guide to Carnivorous Plants of the World (Cheers, 1992).^[101]

Nepenthes × kinabaluensis was first collected near Kambarangoh by Lilian Gibbs in 1910 and later mentioned by Macfarlane as "Nepenthes sp." in 1914.^[102] Although Macfarlane did not formally name the plant, he noted that "[a]ll available morphological details suggest that this is a hybrid between N. villosa and N. rajah".^[103] The name N. × kinabaluensis was first published in Shigeo Kurata's 1976 book, Nepenthes of Mount Kinabalu, but was a nomen nudum at the time as it lacked an adequate description and information on the type specimen. The name was subsequently published validly by Kurata in 1984.^[104]

Hybrid or species?

Lower pitchers of N. × kinabaluensis

Nepenthes × alisaputrana and N. × kinabaluensis are often fertile and thus may breed among themselves. Clive A. Stace writes that we may speak of "stabilised hybrids when they have developed a distributional, morphological or genetic set of characters which is no longer strictly related to that of its parents, ... if the hybrid has become an independent, recognisable, self-producing unit, it is de facto a separate species".^[105] Nepenthes hurrelliana and N. murudensis are two examples of species that have a putative hybrid origin. Nepenthes × alisaputrana and N. × kinabaluensis are sufficiently stabilised that a species status has been discussed.^[16] Indeed, N. kinabaluensis was described as a species by Adam & Wilcock in 1996.

Due to their dioecious nature, a hybrid involving a pair of Nepenthes species can represent one of two possible crosses, depending on which species was the female and which was the male. When the cross is known, the female (or pod) parent is usually referred to first, followed by the male (or pollen) parent. This is an important distinction, as the hybrid will usually display different morphological features according to the type of cross; the pod parent is thought to be dominant in most cases and hybrid offspring usually resemble it more than the pollen parent. Most wild plants of N. × kinabaluensis, for example, show a greater affinity to N. rajah than N. villosa and are thus thought to represent the cross N. rajah × N. villosa. However, specimens have been found that seem to be more similar to N. villosa, suggesting that they might be the reverse cross (see ). The same is true for other hybrids involving N. rajah.

Cultivation

Nepenthes rajah has always been considered to be one of the more difficult Nepenthes species to cultivate. However, in recent years, it has become apparent that the plant may not be deserving of its reputation.

Cultivated N. rajah plant with large lower pitcher

Environmental factors

Nepenthes rajah is a montane species or "highlander", growing at altitudes ranging from 1500 to 2650 m. As such, it requires warm days, with temperatures ranging (ideally) from approximately 25 to 30 ℃,^[106] and cool nights, with temperatures of about 10 to 15 ℃.^[106] Here, it is important to note that the temperatures themselves are not vital (when kept within reasonable limits), but rather the temperature drop itself; N. rajah needs considerably cooler nights, with a drop of 10 ℃ or more being preferable. Failure to observe this requirement will almost certainly doom the plant in the long term or, at best, limit it to being a small, unimpressive specimen.

In addition, like all Nepenthes, this plant needs a fairly humid environment to grow well. Values in the region of 75% R.H.^[106] are generally considered optimal, with increased humidity at night (~90% R.H.). However, N. rajah does tolerate fluctuations in humidity, especially when young, provided that the air does not become too dry (below 50% R.H.). Humidity can be easily controlled using an ultrasonic humidifier in conjunction with a humidistat.

Cultivated N. rajah plant

In its natural habitat, N. rajah grows in open areas, where it is exposed to direct sunlight – it therefore needs to be provided with a significant amount of light in cultivation as well. To meet this need, many growers have used metal halide lamps in the 500–1000 watt range, with considerable success. The plant should be situated a fair distance from the light source, 1 to 2 m is recommended.^[106] Depending on location, growers can utilise natural sunlight as a source of illumination. However, this is only recommended for those living in equatorial regions, where light intensity is sufficient to satisfy the needs of the plant. A photoperiod of 12 hours is comparable to that experienced in nature, since Borneo lies on the equator.^[106]

Potting and watering

Pure long-fibre Sphagnum moss is an excellent potting medium, though combinations involving any of the following – peat, perlite, vermiculite, sand, lava rock, pumice, Osmunda fibre, orchid bark and horticultural charcoal – may be used with equal success. The potting medium should be well-drained and not too compacted. Moss is useful for moisture retention near the roots. The mix should be thoroughly soaked in water prior to potting the plant.

It has been noted that N. rajah produces a very extensive root system (for a Nepenthes) and, for this reason, it is recommended that a wide pot be used to allow for proper development of the root system.^[106] This also eliminates the need for frequent re-potting, which can lead to transplant shock and the eventual death of the plant.^[106]

Purified water should be used for watering purposes, although 'hard water' is tolerated. This is done to minimise the build-up of minerals and chemicals in the soil. Water purity greater than 100 p.p.m. of total dissolved solids is often quoted as ideal.^[107] A reverse osmosis unit can be used to filter the water or, alternatively, bottled distilled water can be purchased. Watering should be done regularly. However, plants should not be allowed to sit in water, as this may lead to root rot.

Cultivated N. rajah pitcher

Feeding and fertilising

Nepenthes rajah is a carnivorous plant and, as such, supplements nutrients gained from the soil with captured prey (especially insects) to alleviate deficiencies in important elements such as nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium. Just as in nature, a cultivated plant's 'diet' may include insects and other prey items, although this is not necessary for successful cultivation. Crickets are recommended for their size and low cost. These can be purchased online or at specialist pet stores. They can simply be dropped into the pitchers by hand or placed inside using metal tongs or similar, whether dead or alive.

From trials carried out by a commercial Nepenthes nursery,^[108] it appears that micronutrient solutions have "a beneficial effect on plants of improved leaf colouration, with no deleterious effects" as far as can be seen. However, more research is required to verify these results. Actual fertilisers (containing NPK) were, on the other hand, found to "cause damage to plants, promote pathogens and have no observable benefits". Hence, the use of chemical fertilisers is usually not advised.

Nepenthes rajah is a slow growing Nepenthes. Under optimal conditions, N. rajah can reach flowering size within 10 years of seed germination.

Common misconceptions

N. rajah growing near a small waterfall

Nepenthes rajah has been a well known and highly sought after species for over a century and, as a result, there are many stories woven around this plant. One such example is the famous legend that N. rajah grows exclusively in the spray zones of waterfalls, on ultramafic soils. Although the latter is true, N. rajah is certainly not found solely in the spray zones of waterfalls and this statement seems to have little basis in fact.^[3] It is likely this misconception was popularised by Shigeo Kurata's 1976 book Nepenthes of Mount Kinabalu, in which he states that "N. rajah is rather fond of wet places like swamps or the surroundings of a waterfall".^[9]

This being the case, certain N. rajah plants do in fact grow in the vicinity of waterfalls (as noted by H. Steiner, 2002) "providing quite a humid microclimate",^[16] which may indeed be the source of this particular misconception.

Another myth surrounding this species is that it occasionally catches small monkeys and other large animals in its pitchers. Such tales have persisted for a very long time, but can probably be explained as rodents being mistaken for other species.^[109] It is interesting to note that one common name for Nepenthes plants is 'Monkey Cups'. The name refers to the fact that monkeys have been observed drinking rainwater from these plants.

Timeline

Timeline of Nepenthes rajah and its natural hybrids

Citations

1. Clarke, Cantley, Nerz, Rischer & Wistuba 2000.
2. Appendices I, II and III. CITES.
3. Clarke 1997, p. 123.
4. Hooker 1859.
5. Hamilton, G. 2011. "The Sabah Society Mesilau Trip, March 26–27, 2011." (PDF). The Sabah Society.
6. McPherson, S.R. 2009. Pitcher Plants of the Old World. 2 volumes. Redfern Natural History Productions, Poole.
7. "Focus: Rajah Brooke's Pitcher Plant" (PDF). (111 KiB)
8. Phillipps 1988, p. 55.
9. Kurata 1976, p. 61.
10. Masters 1881.
11. Reginald 1883.
12. Hemsley 1905.
13. Danser 1928, 38.
14. Phillipps & Lamb 1996, p. 129.
15. Gibson 1983.
16. Steiner 2002, p. 94.
17. Clarke 1997, pp. 120, 122.
18. Clarke 1997, pp. 10, 120.
19. Clarke 2001b, p. 7.
20. Clarke 2001b, p. 26.
21. Clarke & Kruger 2005.
22. Bauer, U., C.J. Clemente, T. Renner & W. Federle 2012. Form follows function: morphological diversification and alternative trapping strategies in carnivorous Nepenthes pitcher plants. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 25(1): 90–102. doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2011.02406.x
23. (German) Schmid-Hollinger, R. N.d. Kannendeckel (lid). bio-schmidhol.ch.
24. Clarke 1997, p. 122.
25. Adam, J.H. & C.C. Wilcock 1999. "Palynological study of Bornean Nepenthes (Nepenthaceae)." (PDF). Pertanika Journal of Tropical Agricultural Science 22(1): 1–7.
26. Clarke 1997, p. 120.
27. Wells, K., M.B. Lakim, S. Schulz & M. Ayasse 2011. Pitchers of Nepenthes rajah collect faecal droppings from both diurnal and nocturnal small mammals and emit fruity odour. Journal of Tropical Ecology 27(4): 347–353. doi:10.1017/S0266467411000162
28. Clarke 1997, p. 33.
29. Moran 1991.
30. "I once found a perfect mouse skeleton in a pitcher of N. rafflesiana" — Ch'ien Lee
31. [Anonymous] 2006.
32. Chin, L., J.A. Moran & C. Clarke 2010. Trap geometry in three giant montane pitcher plant species from Borneo is a function of tree shrew body size. New Phytologist 186 (2): 461–470. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03166.x
33. Walker, M. 2010. Giant meat-eating plants prefer to eat tree shrew poo. BBC Earth News, March 10, 2010.
34. Clarke, C., J.A. Moran & L. Chin 2010. Mutualism between tree shrews and pitcher plants: perspectives and avenues for future research. Plant Signaling & Behavior 5(10): 1187–1189. doi:10.4161/psb.5.10.12807
35. Clarke, C. & J.A. Moran 2011. Incorporating ecological context: a revised protocol for the preservation of Nepenthes pitcher plant specimens (Nepenthaceae). Blumea 56(3): 225–228. doi:10.3767/000651911X605781
36. Davies, E. 2012. David Attenborough's life lessons. BBC Nature Features, November 15, 2012.
37. Moran, J.A., C. Clarke, M. Greenwood & L. Chin 2012. Tuning of color contrast signals to visual sensitivity maxima of tree shrews by three Bornean highland Nepenthes species. Plant Signaling & Behavior 7(10): 1267–1270. doi:10.4161/psb.21661
38. Greenwood, M., C. Clarke, C.C. Lee, A. Gunsalam & R.H. Clarke 2011. A unique resource mutualism between the giant Bornean pitcher plant, Nepenthes rajah, and members of a small mammal community. PLoS ONE 6(6): e21114. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0021114
39. Beaver 1979, pp. 1–10.
40. Clarke 1997, pp. 42–43.
41. Tsukamoto 1989, p. 216.
42. Tsukamoto 1989, p. 220.
43. Edwards 1931, pp. 25–28.
44. Burbidge 1880.
45. Masters, M.T. 1872. The cultivated species of Nepenthes. The Gardeners' Chronicle and Agricultural Gazette 1872(16): 540–542.
46. St. John 1862, pp. 324, 334.
47. Phillipps & Lamb 1996, p. 20.
48. [Anonymous] 1881.
49. Phillipps & Lamb 1996, p. 22.
50. Phillipps & Lamb 1996, p. 21.
51. Phillipps & Lamb 1996, p. 18.
52. Ellis 2000.
53. Kingdom of Plants: Episode 1 - Life in the Wet Zone. Sky Atlantic HD.
54. Beck, G. 1895.
55. Macfarlane 1908, pp. 1–91.
56. Clarke 2001a, pp. 81–82.
57. Clarke 2001a, p. 82.
58. Fairbrothers, Mabry, Scogin & Turner 1975.
59. Adam, Omar & Wilcock 2002, p. 623.
60. Som 1988.
61. Jay & Lebreton 1972, pp. 607–613.
62. Adam, Omar & Wilcock 2002, p. 624.
63. Meimberg et al. 2006
64. Meimberg et al. 2001
65. Nerz & Wistuba 2007.
66. Sabah Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Environment Homepage
67. Adlassnig, Peroutka, Lambers & Lichtscheidl 2005.
68. Clarke 2001b.
69. Kaul 1982.
70. Vegetation Zones on Mount Kinabalu
71. Clarke 1997, p. 2.
72. Clarke 1997, p. 29.
73. Wildlife Conservation Enactment 1997
74. "APPENDICES I AND II as adopted by the Conference of the Parties" (PDF). (120 KiB)
75. Creek, M. 1990. "The conservation of carnivorous plants." (PDF). Carnivorous Plant Newsletter 19(3–4): 109–112.
76. Clarke 2001b, p. 29.
77. Clarke 1997, pp. 170–172.
78. Simpson 1991.
79. Clarke 1997, p. 172.
80. Nineteenth meeting of the Animals Committee. Geneva (Switzerland), 18–21 August 2003.
81. Clarke 2001a, p. 236.
82. Clarke 2001b, p. 38.
83. Malouf 1995, p. 68.
84. Kurata 1976, p. 64–65.
85. Adam, J.H., C.C. Wilcock & M.D. Swaine 1992. "The ecology and distribution of Bornean Nepenthes." (PDF). Journal of Tropical Forest Science 5(1): 13–25.
86. Thong, J. 2006. "Travels around North Borneo – Part 2." (PDF). Victorian Carnivorous Plant Society Journal 82: 6–12.
87. Clarke 1997, p. 143.
88. A rare find: N. rajah nat. hybrid. Flora Nepenthaceae.
89. [Anonymous] 2012. "BE-3518 Nepenthes rajah x mira." (PDF). Nepenthes Growers Newsletter 1(2): 2.
90. Thong, J. 2006. "Travels around North Borneo – Part 1." (PDF). Victorian Carnivorous Plant Society Journal 81: 12–17.
91. Steiner 2002, p. 124.
92. Arx, Schlauer & Groves 2001, p. 44.
93. Adam & Wilcock 1992.
94. Clarke 2001b, p. 10.
95. Clarke 1997, p. 157.
96. Slack 1986.
97. Clarke 1997, pp. 165–167.
98. Kurata 1976, p. 65.
99. Steiner 2002, p. 112.
100. Clarke 2001b, p. 19.
101. Cheers 1992.
102. Kurata 1976, p. 64.
103. Macfarlane 1914, p. 127.
104. Kurata, S. 1984. Journal of Insectivorous Plant Society 35: 65.
105. Stace 1980.
106. On the Cultivation of Nepenthes rajah
107. D'Amato 1998, p. 7.
108. Nepenthes Cultivation and Growing Guides
109. D'Amato 1998, XV.

References

• [Anonymous] 1881. Messrs. Veitch's Nepenthes-house. The Gardeners' Chronicle, new series, 16(410): 598–599.
• [Anonymous] 1883. Mr. A. E. Ratcliff's Nepenthes. The Gardeners' Chronicle 20(497): 18–19.
• [Anonymous] 1884. Nepenthes Rajah. The Gardeners' Chronicle, new series, 21(524): 52.
• [Anonymous] 1884. Nepenthes Rajah. The Gardeners' Chronicle, new series, 21(526): 116.
• [Anonymous] 1887. Nepenthes at Messrs. Veitch's, Chelsea. The Gardeners' Chronicle, series 3, 2(41): 438.
• [Anonymous] 2006. Pflanze verdaut Maus. Spiegel Online 29 September 2006.
• "T. B." 1881. Home correspondence. Nepenthes Rajah. The Gardeners' Chronicle, new series, 16(409): 571.
• Adam, J. H. & C. C. Wilcock 1992. A new natural hybrid of Nepenthes from Mt. Kinabalu (Sabah). Reinwardtia 11: 35–40.
• Adam, J. H. 1997. "Prey spectra of Bornean Nepenthes species (Nepenthaceae) in relation to their habitat." (PDF). Pertanika Journal of Tropical Agricultural Science 20(2–3): 121–134.
• Adam, J. H. & C. C. Wilcock 1998 ['1996']. Pitcher plants of Mt. Kinabalu in Sabah. The Sarawak Museum Journal 50(71): 145–171.
• Adam, J. H., R. Omar & C. C. Wilcock 2002. "Phytochemical Screening of Flavonoids in Three Hybrids of Nepenthes (Nepenthaceae) and their Putative Parental Species from Sarawak and Sabah".. OnLine Journal of Biological Sciences 2 (9): 623–625. ISSN 1608-4127 (Warning: Check ISSN) doi:10.3923/jbs.2002.623.625
• Adlassnig, W., M. Peroutka, H. Lambers & I. K. Lichtscheidl 2005. The roots of carnivorous plants. Root Physiology: from Gene to Function 4: 127–140. ISBN 978-1-4020-4098-6 (print) ISBN 978-1-4020-4099-3 (online) doi:10.1007/1-4020-4099-7_6
• Arx, B., J. Schlauer & M. Groves 2001. CITES Carnivorous Plant Checklist. The Trustees of the Royal Botanic Gardens Kew. 99 pp. ISBN 1-84246-035-8
• Beaman, J.H. & C. Anderson 2004. The Plants of Mount Kinabalu: 5. Dicotyledon Families Magnoliaceae to Winteraceae. Natural History Publications (Borneo), Kota Kinabalu.
• Beaver, R. A. 1979. Fauna and food webs of pitcher plants in West Malaysia. The Malayan Nature Journal 33 (1): 1–10.
• Beck, G. 1895. Die Gattung Nepenthes. Wiener Illustrierte Gartenzeitung.
• Burbidge, F. W. 1880. The Gardens of the Sun. Murray, London. 364 pp.
• Burbidge, F.W. 1882. Notes on the new Nepenthes. The Gardeners' Chronicle, new series, 17(420): 56.
• Chan, S. 2005. Pitcher plant paradise. The Star, August 27, 2005.
• Cheers, G. 1992. Letts Guide to Carnivorous Plants of the World. Letts of London House, Parkgate Road, London SW11 4NQ. x + 174 pp. ISBN 1-85238-124-8
• Clarke, C. M. 1997. Nepenthes of Borneo. Natural History Publications (Borneo), Kota Kinabalu. xi + 207 pp. ISBN 983-812-057-X
• Clarke, C. M. 2001a. Nepenthes of Sumatra and Peninsular Malaysia. Natural History Publications (Borneo), Kota Kinabalu. ix + 325 pp. ISBN 983-812-050-2
• Clarke, C. M. 2001b. A Guide to the Pitcher Plants of Sabah. Natural History Publications (Borneo), Kota Kinabalu. iv + 40 pp. ISBN 983-812-015-4
• Clarke, C. 2013. What Can Tree Shrews Tell Us about the Effects of Climate Change on Pitcher Plants? [video] TESS seminars, 25 September 2013.
• Clarke, C. M. & R. Kruger 2005. Nepenthes rowanae (Nepenthaceae), a remarkable species from Cape York, Australia. Carnivorous Plant Newsletter 34 (2): 36–41.
• Clarke, C. M., R. Cantley, J. Nerz, H. Rischer & A. Witsuba 2000. Nepenthes rajah. IUCN 2006, 2006 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species.
• Corner, E.J.H. 1996. Pitcher-plants (Nepenthes). In: K.M. Wong & A. Phillipps (eds.) Kinabalu: Summit of Borneo. A Revised and Expanded Edition. The Sabah Society, Kota Kinabalu. pp. 115–121. ISBN 9679994740.
• D'Amato, P. 1998. The Savage Garden: Cultivating Carnivorous Plants. Ten Speed Press, Berkeley, California. xxii + 314 pp. ISBN 0-89815-915-6
• Danser, B. H. 1928. 38. Nepenthes Rajah. In: The Nepenthaceae of the Netherlands Indies. Bulletin de Jardin de Botanique, Buitenzorg, Série III, 9 (3–4): 249–438.
• Douglas, J. 1884. Home correspondence. Nepenthes Rajah. The Gardeners' Chronicle, new series, 21(527): 151.
• Edwards, F. W. 1931. Mosquitoes breeding in plant pitchers. Natural History Magazine 3: 25–28.
• Ellis, R. 2000. Carnivores on Stamps and Currency. Carnivorous Plant Newsletter 29 (3): 90–92.
• Fairbrothers, D. E., J. J. Mabry, R. L. Scogin & B. L. Turner 1975. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 62: 765–800.
• Fretwell, S. 2013. Back in Borneo for giant Nepenthes. Part 1: Mesilau Nature Reserve, Ranau. Victorian Carnivorous Plant Society Journal 107: 6–13.
• Gibson, T. C. 1983. "On the Cultivation of the Giant Malaysian Pitcherplant (Nepenthes rajah)." (PDF). (880 KiB) Carnivorous Plant Newsletter 12 (4): 82–84.
• Gibson, T. C. 1988. "A Further Note on Nepenthes rajah Cultivation." (PDF). (112 KiB) Carnivorous Plant Newsletter 17 (3): 84.
• Hemsley, W. B. 1905. Nepenthes Rajah. Curtis's Botanical Magazine, CXXXI (4th series, I) t. 8017.
• Hooker, J. D. 1859. XXXV. On the origin and development of the pitchers of Nepenthes, with an account of some new Bornean plants of that genus. The Transactions of the Linnean Society of London 22(4): 415–424. doi:10.1111/j.1096-3642.1856.tb00113.x
• Jay, M. & P. Lebreton 1972. Chemotaxonomic research on vascular plants. The flavonoids of Sarraceniaceae, Nepenthaceae, Droseraceae and Cephlotaceae, a critical study of the order Sarraceniales. Naturaliste Canadien 99: 607–613.
• Johnson, N. 2013. The history of the genus Nepenthes at Kew. Planta Carnivora 35(1): 6–19.
• Kaul, R. B. 1982. Floral and Fruit Morphology of Nepenthes lowii and N. villosa, Montane Carnivores of Borneo. American Journal of Botany 69 (5): 793–803.
• Kurata, S. 1976. Nepenthes of Mount Kinabalu. Sabah National Parks Publications No. 2, Sabah National Parks Trustees, Kota Kinabalu. 80 pp.
• Kurata, S. 1984. Journal of the Insectivorous Plant Society (Japan) 35: 65.
• Malouf, P. 1995. "A visit to Kinabalu Park." (PDF). (1.20 MiB) Carnivorous Plant Newsletter 24(3): 64–69.
• Macfarlane, J. M. 1908. Nepenthaceae. A. Engler, Das Pflanzenreich IV, 111, Heft. 36: 1–91.
• Macfarlane, J.M. 1911. New species of Nepenthes. Contributions from the Botanical Laboratory of the University of Pennsylvania 3(3): 207–210. (plates I–II)
• Macfarlane, J.M. 1914. Nepenthes sp.. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, XLII.
• Masters, M.T. 1881. New garden plants. Nepenthes Rajah, Hook. f.. The Gardeners' Chronicle, new series, 16(407): 492–493.
• McPherson, S.R. & A. Robinson 2012. Field Guide to the Pitcher Plants of Borneo. Redfern Natural History Productions, Poole.
• Meimberg, H., A. Wistuba, P. Dittrich & G. Heubl 2001. Molecular phylogeny of Nepenthaceae based on cladistic analysis of plastid trnK intron sequence data. Plant Biology 3(2): 164–175. doi:10.1055/s-2001-12897
• (German) Meimberg, H. 2002. "Molekular-systematische Untersuchungen an den Familien Nepenthaceae und Ancistrocladaceae sowie verwandter Taxa aus der Unterklasse Caryophyllidae s. l.." (PDF). Ph.D. thesis, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich.
• Meimberg, H. & G. Heubl 2006. Introduction of a nuclear marker for phylogenetic analysis of Nepenthaceae. Plant Biology 8(6): 831–840. doi:10.1055/s-2006-924676
• Meimberg, H., S. Thalhammer, A. Brachmann & G. Heubl 2006. Comparative analysis of a translocated copy of the trnK intron in carnivorous family Nepenthaceae. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 39(2): 478–490. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2005.11.023
• Mey, F.S. 2014. Joined lecture on carnivorous plants of Borneo with Stewart McPherson. Strange Fruits: A Garden's Chronicle, February 21, 2014.
• Moran, J. A. 1991. The role and mechanism of Nepenthes rafflesiana pitchers as insect traps in Brunei. Ph.D. thesis, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland.
• Nelson, E. C. The waxing of glorious rajah. Kew magazine [May 1991] 8 (2): 81–89.
• Nerz, J. & A. Wistuba 2007. Nepenthes mantalingajanensis (Nepenthaceae), eine bemerkenswerte neue Spezies aus Palawan (Philippinen). Das Taublatt 55(3): 17–25.
• (Japanese) Oikawa, T. 1992. Nepenthes Rajah Hook.f.. In: Muyū kusa – Nepenthes (無憂草 – Nepenthes). [The Grief Vanishing.] Parco Co., Japan. pp. 8–9.
• Phillipps, A. 1988. "A Second Record of Rats as Prey in Nepenthes rajah." (PDF). (203 KiB) Carnivorous Plant Newsletter 17 (2): 55.
• Phillipps, A. & A. Lamb 1996. Pitcher Plants of Borneo. Natural History Publications (Borneo), Kota Kinabalu. x + 171 pp. ISBN 983-812-009-X
• Reginald 1883. Nepenthes Rajah J. D. Hooker. Gartenflora, XXXII, p. 213.
• Saint-John, S. 1862. Life in the Forests of the Far East; or, Travels in northern Borneo. 2 volumes. London: Smith, Elder & Co. (reprinted by Oxford University Press, 1974)
• Simpson, R. 1991. Plants in peril, 15: Nepenthes rajah. Kew magazine [May 1991] 8 (2): 89–94.
• Slack, A. 1979. Nepenthes rajah. In: Carnivorous Plants. Ebury Press, London. p. 85.
• Slack, A. 1986. Insect-Eating Plants and How to Grow Them. Alphabooks, Dorset, UK. 172 pp. ISBN 0-906670-42-X (hardback) ISBN 0-906670-35-7 (paperback)
• Som, R. M. 1988. Systematic studies on Nepenthes species and hybrids in the Malay Peninsula. Ph.D. thesis, Fakulti Sains Hayat, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, UKM Bangi, Selangor Darul Ehsan.
• Stace, C.A. 1980. Plant Taxonomy and Biosystematics. Arnold, London. ISBN 0-521-42785-1
• Steiner, H. 2002. Borneo: Its Mountains and Lowlands with their Pitcher Plants. Toihaan Publishing Company, Kota Kinabalu. viii + 136 pp. ISBN 983-40421-1-6
• Thorogood, C. 2010. The Malaysian Nepenthes: Evolutionary and Taxonomic Perspectives. Nova Science Publishers, New York.
• Tsukamoto, M. 1989. "Two New Mosquito Species from a Pitcher Plant of Mt. Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia: Culex rajah and Toxorhynchites rajah (Diptera: Culicidae)" (PDF).. Japanese Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 17 (3): 215–228.
• Yeo, J. 1996. A trip to Kinabalu Park. Bulletin of the Australian Carnivorous Plant Society, Inc. 15(4): 4–5.

Further reading

• Camilleri, T. 1998. Carnivorous Plants. Kangaroo Press, Roseville, New South Wales, Australia. 104 pp.
• Jebb, M. H. P. & M. R. Cheek 1997. A skeletal revision of Nepenthes (Nepenthaceae). Blumea 42 (1): 1–106.
• Slack, A. 1979. Carnivorous Plants. Alphabooks, Dorset, UK. 240 pp.

External links

General

• Focus: Rajah Brooke's Pitcher Plant
• Die Karnivoren-Datenbank: Nepenthes rajah (German)

Images

• Photographs of N. rajah in its natural habitat
• Images of N. rajah in natural habitat and tissue culture
• Borneo Exotics: Nepenthes rajah

Cultivation

• N. rajah Cultivation Notes
• Further Cultivation Notes
• Colorado Carnivorous Plant Society: Nepenthes rajah
• Growth of plant in cultivation over several years
• Large plants in cultivation

Other

• The International Plant Names Index: Nepenthes rajah
• Nepenthes rajah entry from Danser's Monograph
• IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: Nepenthes rajah
• Video about Nepenthes rajah from The Private Life of Plants