Poor Folk

For people living in poverty, see poverty.

Poor Folk

First English language edition
Author Fyodor Dostoyevsky
Original title Russian: Бедные люди, Bednye lyudi'
Translator Lena Milman
Country Russia
Language Russian
Genre Epistolary novel
Publication date
 1846
Published in English
 1894
Media type Print (Hardback & Paperback)
OCLC 2041466
891.73/3
LC Class PG3328

Poor Folk (Russian: Бедные люди, Bednye lyudi), sometimes translated as Poor People,[note] is the first novel by Fyodor Dostoyevsky, written over the span of nine months between 1844 and 1845. Dostoyevsky was in financial difficulty because of his extravagant living and his developing gambling addiction; although he had produced some translations of foreign novels, they had little success, and he decided to write a novel of his own to try to raise funds.

Inspired by the works of Gogol, Pushkin, and Karamzin, as well as English and French authors, Poor Folk is written in the form of letters between the two main characters, Makar Devushkin and Varvara Dobroselova, who are poor second cousins. The novel showcases the life of poor people, their relationship with rich people, and poverty in general, all common themes of literary naturalism. A deep but odd friendship develops between them until Dobroselova loses her interest in literature, and later in communicating with Devushkin after a rich widower Mr. Bykov proposes to her. Devushkin, a prototype of the clerk found in many works of naturalistic literature at that time, retains his sentimental characteristics; Dobroselova abandons art, while Devushkin cannot live without literature.

Contemporary critics lauded Poor Folk for its humanitarian themes. While Vissarion Belinsky dubbed the novel Russia's first "social novel" and Alexander Herzen called it a major socialist work, other critics detected parody and satire. The novel uses a complicated polyphony of voices from different perspectives and narrators. Initially offered by Dostoyevsky to the liberal-leaning magazine Fatherland Notes, the novel was published in the almanac, St. Petersburg Collection, on January 15, 1846. It became a huge success nationwide. Parts of it were translated into German by Wilhelm Wolfsohn and published in an 1846/1847 magazine.[1] The first English translation was provided by Lena Milman in 1894, with an introduction by George Moore, cover art design by Aubrey Beardsley[2] and publication by London's Mathews and Lane.[3]

Plot

The two main characters
Varvara Dobroselova
Makar Devushkin

Varvara Dobroselova and Makar Devushkin are second cousins twice-removed and live across from each other on the same street in terrible apartments. Devushkin's, for example, is merely a portioned-off section of the kitchen, and he lives with several other tenants, such as the Gorshkovs, whose son who groans in agonizing hunger almost the entire story and eventually dies. Devushkin and Dobroselova exchange letters attesting to their terrible living conditions and the former frequently squanders his money on gifts for her.

The reader progressively learns their history. Dobroselova originally lived in the country, but moved to St. Petersburg (which she hates) when her father lost his job. Her father becomes very violent and her mother severely depressed. Her father dies and they move in with Anna Fyodorovna, a landlady who was previously cruel to them but at least pretends to feel sympathy for their situation. Dobroselova is tutored by a poor student named Pokrovsky, whose drunken father occasionally visits. She eventually falls in love with Pokrovsky. She struggles to save a measly amount of money to purchase the complete works of Pushkin at the market for his birthday present, then allows his father to give the books to him instead, claiming that just knowing he received the books will be enough for her happiness. Pokrovsky falls ill soon after, and his dying wish is to see the sun and the world outside. Dobroselova obliges by opening the blinds to reveal grey clouds and dirty rain. In response Pokrovsky only shakes his head and then passes away. Dobroselova's mother dies shortly afterwards, and Dobroselova is left in the care of Anna for a time, but the abuse becomes too much and she goes to live with Fedora across the street.

Devushkin works as a lowly copyist, frequently belittled and picked on by his colleagues. His clothing is worn and dirty, and his living conditions are perhaps worse than Dobroselova's. He considers himself a rat in society. He and Dobroselova exchange letters (and occasional visits that are never detailed), and eventually they also begin to exchange books. Devushkin becomes offended when she sends him a copy of "The Overcoat", because he finds the main character is living a life similar to his own.

Dobroselova considers moving to another part of the city where she can work as a governess. Just as he is out of money and risks being evicted, Devushkin has a stroke of luck: his boss takes pity on him and gives him 100 rubles to buy new clothes. Devushkin pays off his debts and sends some to Dobroselova. She sends him 25 rubles back because she does not need it. The future looks bright for both of them because he can now start to save money and it may be possible for them to move in together.

The writer Ratazyayev, who jokes about using Devushkin as a character in one of his stories offends him, but genuinely seems to like him. Eventually Devushkin's pride is assuaged and their friendship is restored. The Gorshkovs come into money because the father's case is won in court. With the generous settlement they seem to be destined to be perfectly happy, but the father dies, leaving his family in a shambles despite the money. Soon after this, Dobroselova announces that a rich man, Mr. Bykov who had dealings with Anna Fyodorovna and Pokrovsky's father, has proposed to her. She decides to leave with him, and the last few letters attest to her slowly becoming accustomed to her new money.

She asks Devushkin to find linen for her and begins to talk about various luxuries, but leaves him alone in the end despite his improving fortunes. In the last correspondence in the story, on September 29, Devushkin begs Dobroselova to write to him. Dobroselova responds saying that "all is over" and to not forget her. The last letter is from Devushkin saying that he loves her and that he will die when he leaves her.

Main characters

Creation

Dostoyevsky as an engineer

Dostoyevsky showed interest in literature since his childhood. His mother's subscription to the Library of Reading enabled the family entry into the leading contemporary Russian and non-Russian literature. Gothic tales, such as by Ann Radcliffe, was the first genre Dostoyevsky was introduced to. Other formative influences were the works by the poets Alexander Pushkin and Vasily Zhukovsky, heroic epics usually by Homer and chivalric novels by Cervantes and Walter Scott.[10]

Dostoyevsky initially attended the best private school in Moscow, the Chermak boarding school. Founded by a Czech immigrant, who moved to Russia after the Napoleonic Wars, it put strong emphasis on literature. As the school required 800 rubles per year, his father had to do additional work and ask his aristocratic relatives, the Kumanins, for money.[11] Although Dostoyevsky settled in well, he had to leave after his mother's death on 27 September 1837 led to financial problems for his family. He was sent to the Military Engineering-Technical University, he had problems adjusting to life there, but nevertheless managed to graduate on 12 August 1843 as a military engineer. After his graduation, he lived a quite liberal lifestyle, attending many plays and the ballets of composers Ole Bull and Franz Liszt, and renting an expensive apartment, the Prianishnikov House, for 1,200 rubles, even though he was only earning 5,000 rubles per year.[12] These events and his introduction to casinos were responsible for his deteriorating financial situation. He worked as a translator, but the translations he completed in 1843, such as Balzac's Eugénie Grandet and Sand's La dernière Aldini,[13][14] were not very successful. His gambling and betting on billiard games were a huge drain on his funds because of his frequent losses. As a consequence, Dostoyevsky was often forced to ask his relatives for money, but he felt uncomfortable doing so and decided to write a novel to raise money. "It's simply a case" Dostoyevsky wrote to his brother Mikhail, "of my novel covering all. If I fail in this, I'll hang myself."[15]

Dostoyevsky began working on Poor Folk in early 1844. He first mentioned the upcoming work in a letter to Mikhail on 30 September 1844: "I am finishing up a novel of the size of Eugénie Grandet. It's a rather original work."[16] Dostoyevsky later wrote to his brother on 23 March 1845, "I finished the novel in November, then rewrote it in December, and again in February–March. I am seriously satisfied with my novel. It is a serious and elegant work ..."[17] Sometime around April 1845, his friend Dmitry Grigorovich, with whom he had shared an apartment since the autumn of 1844, proposed giving the manuscript to poet Nikolay Nekrasov, who was planning to issue an anthology in 1846. Dostoyevsky took the manuscript to Nekrasov and returned home. Shortly afterwards the doorbell of his house rang, and he opened the door to the excited Nekrasov and Grigorovich, both of whom congratulated him on his debut novel, of which they had only read 10 pages. They finished the full 112-page work during the night at Dostoyevsky's apartment. The next morning, the three men went to the critic Vissarion Belinsky; Nekrasov proclaimed Dostoyevsky "the New Gogol" though Belinsky replied sceptically "You find Gogol's springing up like mushrooms". Dostoyevsky himself did not believe his book would receive a positive review from Belinsky, but when Nekrasov visited Belinsky in the evening, the latter wanted to meet Dostoyevsky to congratulate him on his debut.[18] Dostoyevsky proposed to issue Poor Folk in the Fatherland Notes, but it was instead published in the almanac St. Petersburg Collection on January 15, 1846.[19]

Themes and style

Makar Devushkin

Poor Folk explores poverty and the relationship between the poor and the rich, common themes of literary naturalism. Largely influenced by Nikolai Gogol's "The Overcoat", Alexander Pushkin's "The Stationmaster" and Letters of Abelard and Heloise by Peter Abelard and Héloïse d’Argenteuil,[20] it is an epistolary novel composed of letters written by Varvara and her close friend Makar Devushkin. The name of the book and the main female character were adapted from Karamzin's Poor Liza.[21] Additional elements include the backgrounds of the two protagonists and the tragic ending, both typical characteristics of a middle-class novel.[22]

Belinsky and others saw "The Overcoat" as the inspiration for the novel. Later critics stated that the sentimental-humanitarian Poor Folk contained a great deal of parody and satire of Gogol books; however, there are some dissenters. Karin Jeanette Harmon guesses in "Double Parody Equals Anti-Parody" that Dostoyevsky mixes the parody of the sentimental epistolary novel with the parody of the naturalistic sketch of the clerk.[5] Robert Payne rejects the idea of any satiric content;[5] he notes that satire began in The Double. A similar view was held by Belinsky, who also stated that "Dostoyevsky's talent is ... not descriptive, but to the highest degree creative." Victor Terras thought that Dostoyevsky did not use satire except in a few cases, but instead employed a "humor derived from the eternal conflict between the simple soul of a good man and the complex apparatus of the soulless, institutionalized society run by 'clever' people."[23] Joseph Frank, who suggested that the whole work is a "serious parody", recalled that Poor Folk burlesques the "high-society adventure novel, the Gogolian humorous local color-tale" and "the debunking physiological sketch".[24] Victor Terras dubbed it a "travesty of the sentimental epistolary love story."[25] The Contemporary stated "In this work comedy is somehow explored and includes an appreciable tone, colour and even the language of Gogol and Kvitka".[26][27] "Through his tale", wrote The Northern Bee, "Dostoyevsky wanted to utilize Gogol's humour with naive simplicity of the undisturbed Osnovyanenko."[28][27]

According to critic Rebecca Epstein Matveyev, Pushkin's "The Stationmaster" serves as a "thematic subtext, as a basis for Devushkin's literary experiments, and as a resource for his epistolary relationship."[5] Both, "The Stationmaster" and "The Overcoat", are mentioned in the letters between Dobroselova and Devushkin. Dostoyevsky may have chosen the epistolary genre to include his personal critical observations, similar to real-life letters between writer and addressee. According to Yakubovich, Dostoyevsky uses Poor Folk as his diary.[20] However, as an external narrator is missing the only source for the character's motivation and personality is available in the letters and Dobroselova's diary. The numerous different voices, that is Devushkin's quotations from stories, his commentaries about these books and his own works, is an example of polyphony. These effects confuse the reader and hide the narrator.[5]

Reception

Poor Folk received nationwide critical acclaim. Dostoyevsky observed that "the whole of Russia is talking about my Poor Folk".[29] As soon as he read the manuscript for Poor Folk, Belinsky named it Russia's first "social novel".[30] Alexander Herzen praised the book in his essay "About the Progress of Revolutionary Ideas in Russia", noting the book's "socialistic tendencies and animations."[31] The work was classified by critic Pavel Annenkov as a work of the so-called "natural school". The newspaper The Northern Bee recorded:[32]

News about a new genius, Mr. Dostoevsky, is circulating across St. Petersburg. We do not know whether it is his real name or a pen-name. The reading audience is praising his new novel, Poor People. I have read this novel and said: 'Poor Russian readers!' However, Mr. Dostoevsky is a man of some talent and, if he finds his way in literature, he will be able to write something decent."
— The Northern Bee, 1 February 1848, no. 27

Nikolay Dobrolyubov in the 1861 essay "Dowtrodden People", that Dostoyevsky studies poor reality and expresses humanistic ideas. He also praised him for illustrating human nature and taking out "souls in the centre of the depth which are caged after protesting for indentity against the exterior, violent pressure, and presents it to our verdict."[31]

Apollon Grigoriev wrote in The Finnish Herald: "Dostoevsky starts to play in our literature the same role Hoffmann played in German literature ... He became so deeply immersed in the life of civil servants that the dull and uninteresting everyday life became for him a nightmare close to madness."[33] Count Vladimir Sollogub also liked the novel, stating that "it was written with force and simplicity by a great talent."[34] Valerian Maykov noted after a number of publications by Dostoyevsky: "Gogol was usually the leading social poet, while Dostoyevsky usually the leading psychological poet. The former is known as the representative of the contemporary society or contemporary circle, for the latter the society itself becomes interesting through its influence on other people."[35]

Translations

The following is a list of English versions (publication date in parentheses):[36]

See also

Notes

1.^ Depending on the translation, the work is also known as Poor People as the Russian word for "poor" (bedny) has different meanings, such as misfortune, poverty, trouble or calamity, and the nearest translation for lyudi in this case is "people", not "folk".[7]

References

  1. ↑ Meier-Gräfe 1988, p. 492.
  2. ↑ Kaye 1999, p. 13.
  3. ↑ Bloshteyn 2007, p. 235.
  4. ↑ Apollonio 2009, p. 14.
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Matveyev, Rebecca Epstein (Winter 1995). "Textuality and Intertextuality in Dostoevsky's Poor Folk". The Slavic and East European Journal. American Association of Teachers of Slavic and East European Languages. 39 (4): 535–51. doi:10.2307/309105. JSTOR 309105.  – via JSTOR (subscription required)
  6. ↑ Hoisington 1995, p. 125.
  7. 1 2 Fanger 1998, p. 153.
  8. ↑ Frank 2009, p. 77.
  9. ↑ Müller 1982, p. 11.
  10. ↑ Kjetsaa 1989, p. 10.
  11. ↑ Lantz 2004, p. 55.
  12. ↑ Sekirin 1997, pp. 51–52.
  13. ↑ Sekirin 1997, p. 51.
  14. ↑ Carr 1962, p. 20.
  15. ↑ Fyodor Dostoyevsky. "Letters of Fyodor Michailovitch Dostoyevsky to his family and friends". Translated by Ethel Golburn Mayne. Retrieved 3 October 2012.
  16. ↑ Lantz 2004, p. 333.
  17. ↑ Sekirin 1997, p. 59.
  18. ↑ Dostoyevsky 1877, pp. 307–17.
  19. ↑ Mochulsky 1973, pp. 24,46.
  20. 1 2 Apollonio 2009, p. 13.
  21. ↑ Frank 2009, p. 73.
  22. ↑ Vinogradov, p. 162.
  23. ↑ Barnhart 2005, pp. 226–27.
  24. ↑ Frank 1979, pp. 137–58.
  25. ↑ Terras 1998, p. 30.
  26. ↑ Пушкин, Александр Сергеевич; (Князь), Петр Андреевич Вяземский; Жуковский, Василий Андреевич; Плетнев, Петр Александрович; Некрасов, Николай Алексеевич; Панаев, Иван Иванович; Боград, Владимир Эммануилович (1846). "New Stories". The Contemporary (in Russian). XLI: 273. Retrieved 5 October 2012.
  27. 1 2 Vinogradov, p. 161.
  28. ↑ The Northern Bee, in Russian, 1846, vol.25
  29. ↑ Fyodor Dostoyevsky (8 October 1846). A Writer's Diary (in Russian). 15th Letters 1834–1881. Nauka. pp. 51–53. ISBN 5-02-028255-3.
  30. ↑ Sekirin 1997, p. 73.
  31. 1 2 Georgy Mikhailovich Fridlender. "Бедные Люди (Poor People)". Complete Letters in 15 Volumes (in Russian). Retrieved 21 October 2012.
  32. ↑ Sekirin 1997, p. 57.
  33. ↑ Sekirin 1997, p. 60.
  34. ↑ Sekirin 1997, p. 74.
  35. ↑ "V". Annals of the Fatherland (PDF) (in Russian). 53. Andrei Kraevsky. 1847. pp. 2–4. Retrieved 4 October 2012.
  36. ↑ "List of translations". Worldcat. Retrieved 1 December 2012.
Bibliography
Wikisource has original text related to this article:
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 11/26/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.